Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Krishna Sawhney vs.vinod Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on:04. 04.2018 RC.REV. 494/2016 & CM No.37792/2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Satyam Thareja, Advocate GOPAL KRISHNA SAWHNEY versus VINOD KUMAR ..... Respondent $~ * % + Through Ms.Sonali Malhotra & Mr.Amit Sanduja, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. This revision petition is filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as DRC Act) to impugn the order of eviction dated 20.5.2016 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as the ARC).2. The respondent/landlord filed an eviction petition against the tenant/petitioner under section 14(1)(e) read with section 25B of the DRC Act seeking eviction of the premises 3Shahzada Bagh, Old Rohtak Road, Delhi comprising of three rooms, kitchen, toilet, bathroom with small courtyard on the ground floor. It was pleaded in the Eviction Petition that the premises was let out to the petitioner/tenant by t...
Shaswati Sinha vs.directorate of Education and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3192/2018 & CM No.12649/2018 Through: Mr.Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus SHASWATI SINHA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR. Through: Mr.Subrahmanyam BKV, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner claims to have been duly elected as Secretary-cum-Manager of the respondent-school in December, 2016 but she was removed from the said position on 20th March, 2017 and in this regard, petitioner had made a complaint to respondent-Directorate of Education who vide order of 23rd October, 2017 (Annexure-C) has declared that the removal of petitioner as Secretary-cum-Manager of the respondent-school is not as per rules and the school management was directed to follow the rules and approved scheme of management. Grievance of petitioner is that the Managing Committee of respondent-school is insisting upon Mr.Joy Mukherjee to officiate...
Neeraj Batra vs.m/s Psa Nitrogen Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~CP-22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + CO.PET. 526/2012 NEERAJ BATRA Date of decision:04. 04.2018 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.T.K.Tiwari, Adv. versus M/S PSA NITROGEN LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vikas Agarwal, Ms.Shaili Pande and Mr.Amir, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been supplying steel products on regular basis to the respondent company as per their orders. It has been pleaded that after giving due credit of all payments made by the respondent company to the petitioner after March 2011 an outstanding amount of Rs.25,05,676/- was due and payable by the respondent company. On 1.6.2012 the petitioner issued a legal notice to the respondent demanding the payment of the outstanding dues. A response was received from the respondent on 10.7.2012 statin...
Jet Asia Airways Ltd vs.air India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h April, 2018. CS(COMM) 641/2017 JET ASIA AIRWAYS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary and Mr. Kunal Sachdeva, Advs. AIR INDIA LIMITED Versus ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain and Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14576/2017 (of defendant for leave to defend) 1. The plaintiff, on 21st September, 2017, instituted this suit under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for recovery of USD12092,550 equivalent to Rs.78,60,15,750/- along with pendente lite and future interest @ 24% per annum, pleading (i) that the plaintiff is an international airlines company based in Thailand and provides full-service scheduled and chartered services as well as long and short terms Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance and Insurance (ACMI) which are also known as Wet Lease; (ii) that the defendant is a Public Sector Airlines; (iii) that in the month of June 2014, ...
Ndmc Through: Education Officer vs.arya Dharam Seva Sangh (Substituted ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h April, 2018 CM(M) No.37/2013 & CMs No.548/2013 & 549/2013 (both for stay). NDMC THROUGH: EDUCATION OFFICER ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek B. Saharya, Mr. Mananjay Kumar Mishra and Ms. Neha Makhija, Advs. Versus ARYA DHARAM SEVA SANGH (SUBSTITUTED BY ABHISHEK BUILDCON (P) LTD.) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanat Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 2nd March, 2012 of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal, Delhi of dismissal of RCA No.1-A/11 preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 20th November, 2010 in E-(old numbers E-RC992/03, RC/ARC8802006 and E-22/08) of the Court of Additional Rent Controller, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi allowing the petition filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for eviction of the petitioner...
Mahua Gupta & Ors. Vs.directorate of Education & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 9146/2017 & CM No.37428/2017 MAHUA GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shohit Chaudhry, Ms.Gunjan Bansal & Mr.Kushagra Nigam, Advs. versus DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel & Mr.Aniruddha Deshmukh, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr.Jayant Sud, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Honey Khanna, Advs. for R-3 Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2 & 4. Mr.Rajan Chawla & Mr.S.B. Singh, Advs. for R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) CM No.11929/2018 1. Pursuant to the last order dated 23.03.2018, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 4 submits that he has instructions to state that the respondents are not insisting that any student should purchase the entire set of books from any of WP (C) No.9146/2017 Page 1 of 4 their book shops or the website and submits that the students would be free to purchase any individual book/books, which they so desire...
Major Dr. Ravinder Kumar (Retd.) vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3250/2018 & CM127882018 MAJOR DR. RAVINDER KUMAR (RETD.) Through: Mr. A.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD AND ANR. Through: Mr. Anchit Sharma, Advocate .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner seeks a mandamus to first respondent to appoint him as General Duty Medical Officer (for short GDMO) against a vacancy declared on 31st October, 2016, which, according to petitioner, is still vacant. To seek the relief, as sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-11) was made by petitioner on 17th March, 2018 to first respondent. According to learned counsel for petitioner, there is no response to the said Representation (Annexure P-11).2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that the said Representation (Annexure P-11) would be positively decided within a period of four weeks from today.3. Learned counsel for petitione...
Gursharan Kaur vs.harbans Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"4th April, 2018 CM (M) 349/2016 GURSHARAN KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. T.S. Ahuja & Mr. Varun Ahuja, Advs. versus HARBANS SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Tarun Kr. Malhotra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is concededly the landlord vis--vis the respondent, the tenant, in respect of premises described as shop situated in property No.663/12, Mehta Market, Pandit Park, Patparganj Road, Delhi- 110051 as specifically shown in colour red in the site plan filed with the petition for eviction submitted on 04.02.2012 which was registered by the Rent Controller as eviction case No.10/2012. The case for eviction was instituted on the ground provided under Section 14 (1) (b) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the allegations that the respondent (the tenant) had sublet the demised premises to two persons Amrik Singh and Satnam Singh who were in its use and enjoyment to his exclusion. It...
Narinder Khanna vs.norther Railway Catering Unit and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~23 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7468/2017 & CM APPL. 30789/2017 % Date of decision :4. h April, 2018 NARINDER KHANNA ........ Petitioner Through :... Petitioner in person. versus NORTHER RAILWAY CATERING UNIT AND ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Adv. for R Mr. Jagjit Singh, Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Narayan Dev Parashar, Adv. for R-2/Railways. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 Counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.1 has been handed over in court which is taken on record.2. This writ petition relates to supply of hygienic eatable goods and water to passengers at railway stations and on the trains, both essentials which cannot be denied.3. The very issues raised by the petitioner were pending in this court since 2012 in W.P.(C)No.5902/2012 as well. Extensive responses stand filed by the Indian Railways in W.P.(C)No.5902/2012. Even the Food Safet...
Paramjit Anand vs.mohan Lal Anand (Since Deceased) Through Lrs & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) Nos.575/2001 & conn. matters 4th April, 2018 + % 1. PARAMJIT ANAND CS(OS) No.575/2001 Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate. MOHAN LAL ANAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ORS. ..... Defendants versus Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr. Karanpreet Singh, Advocate. CS(OS) No.1588/2007 2. MOHAN LAL ANAND (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LRS & ..... Plaintiffs ANR. Through: Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr. Karanpreet Singh, Advocate. versus PARAMJEET ANAND & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Manjit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate. Test Cas. No.23/2007 3. NARESH ANAND Through: ........ Petitioner Mr. Rajat Wadhwa, Advocate with Mr. Karanpreet Singh, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent CS(OS) No.5& conn. matters Page 1 of 60 CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. Three matters are being decided in terms of the present judgment. The three mat...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »