Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dijo Mathew and Ors. Vs.insurance Regulatory and Development Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. 4.2018 31080/2016 DIJO MATHEW AND ORS + W.P.(C) 3165/2016 & CM Nos. 13551/2016, 18461/2016, INSURANCE REGULATORY AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF INDIA versus Through : Mr Azeem Samuel, Mr Akhil Kulshrestha, Advs. ..... Respondent ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. Dipak K. Nag, Adv. for Respt. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP for CBI with Mr. Philomon Kani, Ms. Kriti Handa, Ms. Hansika Sahu and Ms. Damini K., Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 12.02.2016, issued by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (in short IRDA).2. To be noted, there are four petitioners who are arrayed as parties to the instant writ petition. I am informed that petitioner Nos.1 to 3 are employees of petitioner No.4, which is a proprietorship concern of Mr. Sanjeev Soni. Therefore, in effect, it is petitioner No.4, who, via its authorized rep...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.the Delhi Public School Society
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 03.2018 Pronounced on:03. 04.2018 ITA10862005 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) ..... Appellant versus THE DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY ..... Respondent And connected matters: + + + + W.P.(C) 5340/2008 + + ITA5012008 ITA5212008 ITA6052008 ITA6092008 ITA14322010 Present : Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra, Adv. for appellant in ITA Nos.1086/2005, 501/2008, 521/2008, 5340/2008, 609/2008 & 1432/2010. Mr.Puneet Rai, Adv. for appellant in ITA No.605/2008. Mr.M.S.Syali, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Satyen Sethi, Mr.Arta Trana Panda, Mr.Mayank Nagi, Ms.Gargi Sethee and Mr.Mohit Jhamb, Advs. for respondent in ITA Nos.1086/2005, 501/2008, 521/2008, 605/2008, 609/2008 & 1432/2010 and for the petitioner in ITA No.5340/2008. Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI in ITA No.5340/2008. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Page 1 of 2 The assessees writ petition (Writ Petition (Civil) No.5340/2008) is allowed ...
Sew Infrasturcture Limited vs.steel Authority of India Limited (Sail)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 136/2018 & IA No.4264/2018 SEW INFRASTURCTURE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Arun Kumar Varma, Senior S.K. Advocate with Mr Sameer Chandwani, Mr Chandwani and Mr Ashish Joshi, Advocates. versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED (SAIL) Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0304.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter SEWIL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act), inter alia, impugning the arbitral award dated 22.11.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three members, namely, Dr Vishwapati Trivedi, Sh M.M. Sharma and Sh K.K. Singal (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was rendered by the majority with Sh K.K. Singal passing a separate order dated 30.11.2017 in the matter. O.M.P. (COMM) 136/2018 Page 1 of 16 2. The impugned award was rendere...
Chander Mohan Maggon vs.tejinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 631/2018 Judgment delivered on:02. 04.2018 CHANDER MOHAN MAGGON versus TEJINDER SINGH ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr Sarthak Maggon, Advocate. Mr Ankur Jain CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0204.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 631/2018 & Crl.M.A.2277/2018(stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 21.07.2017 passed by the Revisional Court dismissing the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner impugning the condition imposed by the Trial Court of furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.3 lakhs with one surety of the like amount.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said condition is onerous as the petitioner does not have the wherewithal to furnish a surety of the said amount. CRL.M.C. 631/2018 Page 1 of 4 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Revisional Court, while rejectin...
Sh. Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs.m/s Institute of Hotel Management, Cater ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~57 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:02. 04.2018 W.P. (C) 3070/2018 SH. ASHWANI KUMAR AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Zaryab J.Rizvi, Advocate with Ms.Firdouse R.Wani and Ms.Ishita Nagpaul, Advocates. versus M/S INSTITUTE OF HOTEL MANAGEMENT, CATERING AND NUTRITION, PUSA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Deepika Marwaha, Advocate with Ms.Worthing Kasar and Ms.Raunika Johar, Advocates for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CM No.12215-12217/2018 (exemptions) Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed of. W.P. (C) 3070/2018 1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction in the nature of mandamus or any other writ for setting aside the Award dated 26.03.2015 passed by the learned W.P. (C) 3070/2018 Page 1 of 7 Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XVII, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (here...
Shahwaiz Ahmed and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 02, 2018 W.P.(C) 2367/2016 & CMs 10151/16, 135SHAHWAIZ AHMED AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rana Ranjit Singh and Mr. Vivek Kumar Singh, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Ghose, ASC with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide order of 2nd February, 2016 (Annexure P-3 colly.), petitioners service stands terminated on account of the reasons spelt out therein. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that aforesaid order has been passed by the Registrar of Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad, who is not competent to issue impugned order as respondent-Parishad stood dissolved on 16th July, 2015 in terms of Section 32 of the Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad Act, 1998 (hereinafter referred to as the DBCP Act of 1998).2. To seek regularization of petitioners contractual service, reliance is placed upon order of 19th Octobe...
Ms. Abhiruchi Passi and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:02. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 3069/2018 & CM No.12213-14/2018 MS. ABHIRUCHI PASSI AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Piyush Gaur & Ms.Akshara Chauhan, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Apoorv Kurup with Ms.Isha Mital, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Anil Soni, Standing Counsel with Mr.Abhinav Tyagi, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners who claim to have obtained M.Tech. qualification through Distance Education from a deemed to be university namely Institute of Advanced Studies in Education, Rajasthan, have impugned a public notice issued by respondent No.3 in December 2017 permitting the students who have undergone Diploma/P.G. Diploma/Degree/M.E./M.Tech. in Engineering during the years 2001 to 2005 from four deemed to be universities including WP (C) No.3069/2018 Page 1 of 7 the institute...
Solanki Girish vs.uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~44. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6771/2017 1. SOLANKI GIRISH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishal Chaudhary, Advocate UOI versus Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC with Mr. Devender Singh, AC/CISF. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % The petitioner, working on the post of a Constable in the ORDER0204.2018 respondent/CISF, is aggrieved by the order dated 25.08.2015, passed by the Assistant Commandant, imposing a punishment of fine equivalent to one days salary on him on account of his failure to chain his rifle, as noted during an inspection conducted on 11.08.2015. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the order dated 26.09.2015 passed by the Senior Commandant, dismissing his appeal against the order dated 25.08.2015 passed by the Disciplinary Authority and the order dated 22.02.2016 passed by the Revisionary Authority, upholding the punishment imposed on him by the Disciplinary Authority.2. The brief facts...
j.r.william Singh vs.the Institute of Chartered Accountants
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~R-204 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of order : April 02, 2018 W.P.(C) 8681/2005, CM Nos.6511/2005 & 10267/2006 J.R.WILLIAM SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Tamali Wad and Mr.Prince Anthony, Advocates versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS Through: Mr.Rakesh Aggarwal, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Vide office order of 14th February, 2005 (Annexure A-22) petitioner, an Electrician with respondent-Institute was transferred from Noida Office to DCO-Kanpur as an Electrician. In this petition not only quashing of office order (Annexure A-22) but also of order dated 28th April, 2004 (Annexure A-14) is sought. Vide office order of 28th April, 2004 (Annexure A-14), petitioner has been posted at a new location i.e. HRD (NOIDA) from existing location i.e. diary and dispatch at Head Office. According to petitioner, office order of 28th April, 2004 (Annexure A-14) is a demotion order as he claims that vide office o...
Federation of Nehru Place Association (Regd) vs.south Delhi Municipal ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-02-2018
$~51 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI5 Date of Judgment:2. d April, 2018 LPA6232016 & CM.APPL2932017 FEDERATION OF NEHRU PLACE ASSOCIATION (REGD) ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ravi Sikri, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Mr. Deepank Yadav and Ms. Samridhi Kapur, Advocates versus SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel and Mr. Sri Harsha Peechara, Standing Counsel with Ms. Vidhi Jain and Mr. Shashi Gupta Advocate for SDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal filed by the petitioner/appellant aggrieved by the order dated 12.09.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court. The appellant, federation of Nehru Place Association(Regd), is stated to be consisting of all trade associations of Nehru Place formed with an object to safeguard business interests of property owners, property occupiers (her...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »