Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jainis Dubey vs.bank of Baroda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3218/2018 & CM Nos.12748-49/2018 JAINIS DUBEY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Abhishek Chakraborty, Advocate versus BANK OF BARODA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate for Mr.B.S.Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of memorandum of 15th January, 2018 and notice of 17th March, 2018 requiring petitioner to appear for preliminary hearing on 6th April, 2018 is sought in this petition on the ground that participation in departmental proceedings would gravely prejudice petitioner who is facing criminal trial in which charge sheet has been already filed.... Petitioner vide representation of 13th February, 2018 (Annexure P-6) had sought putting on hold the disciplinary proceedings till the outcome of the criminal trial on the ground that petitioner will suffer grave prejudice and his defence would be compromised, if petitioner is called upon to di...
Indo Nabin Projects Ltd. Vs.powergrid Corporation of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (COMM) 140/2018 & IA Nos. 4344-4345/2018 INDO NABIN PROJECTS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. with MrAnand Advocate Kumar Jha, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent Through POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0404.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning an arbitral award dated 13.10.2017 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by an Arbitral Tribunal constituted of three Arbitrators Justice Sh. S.R. Singh (Retired), Presiding Arbitrator Justice Sh. C.S. Rajan (Retired) and Sh. J.Kumar, Advocate (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was delivered in the context of the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to two Contract Agreements entered into between the parties on 27.10.2010, inter alia, entailing executio...
Tandon Chikan vs.new Delhi Municipal Council and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision-04.04.2018. + W.P.(C) 29/2013 TANDON CHIKAN ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Manish Mr.Pranay Raj Singh, Advs. versus Sharma with NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR ..... Respondent Through Mr.Vivek B.Sahaya, ASC for NDMC with Mr.Mananjay Kumar Mishra,Adv. Mr.Manish Manglin, AAO, NDMC Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Sr.Astt. Mr.Layak Ram, Jr.Astt. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner, who is a licensee of shop no.20, Palika Bazar, Connaught Place, New Delhi carrying out the trade of Lucknow Chikan Handicrafts Work, has impugned the notice dated 09.11.2012 issued by respondents, whereby a sum of Rs.1,69,506/- had been claimed from the petitioner on account of arrears of license fee up to October 2012.2. Pursuant to the directions of this Court, vide its order dated 08.05.2017, the respondents have filed a statement of account along with the justification for claiming the af...
Binod Kumar Singh vs.rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3190/2018 & CM No.12625/2018 BINOD KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Shibashish Misra and Ms.Bhabna versus Das, Advocates RASHTRIYA SANSKRIT SANSTHAN AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gyan Prakash, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Vide impugned order of 29th June, 2017 (Annexure P-2), petitioner's Service Agreement of 11th November, 2013 has been terminated and petitioner was removed from the post of Registrar of respondent-Sansthan, which had been challenged by way of an appeal. Vide order of 4th January, 2018, petitioner's statutory appeal stands dismissed. After petitioner had worked on the post of Registrar of respondent-Sansthan for more than two years, departmental proceedings were initiated against him on account of some complaint received W.P.(C) 3190/2018 Page 1 of 3 regarding es...
Amar Jyoti Brahamchari vs.convent of Jesus & Mary School & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3231/2018 AMAR JYOTI BRAHAMCHARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.R.K.Saini and Mr.Avadh Kaushik, Advocates versus CONVENT OF JESUS & MARY SCHOOL & ANR Through: Mr.Gaurav Dhingra, Advocate for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner claims to have retired as Primary School Teacher on 31st August, 2015. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was a party in W.P.(C) No.1055/2013 titled Deepa Joshi & Ors. Vs. Convent of Jesus & Mary through its principal & Ors. in which direction was issued by this Court on 19th September, 2014 to the respondent-Directorate of Education to calculate the amounts payable to petitioner and similarly placed persons after implementation of 5th and 6th Pay Commission and upon granting benefit of ACP and MACP Schemes.2. Vide order of 28th August, 2015, respondent-Directorate of Education has made the calcula...
Jagjit Singh vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~13 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5902/2012 & CM APPL. 12151/2012 % Date of decision :4. h April, 2018 JAGJIT SINGH ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. K.C. Mittal, Mr. Amit Prakash and Mr. Yugansh Mittal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Shahi and Mr. Harsh Pandit, Advs. for UOI. Mr. Jagjit Singh, Ms. Preet Singh and Mr. Narayan Dev Parashar, Advs. for Railways. Mr. Mehmood Pracha, Mr. R.H.A. Sikander and Mr. Prateek Gupta, Advs. for FSSAI/R-4 & 5. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This petition was filed by the writ petitioner on 11th September, 2012 seeking the following prayers : W.P.(C)No.5902/2012 Page 1 of 9 2. a. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to immediately issue notifications in compliance of Section 30, 36, 37, 43, 44, 45, 68, 70 & 90 of FSS Act 2006 for...
Sanjeev Gupta vs.delhi Developmentauthority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SANJEEV GUPTA RFA No.301/2018 4th April, 2018 ..... Appellant Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. Through: versus DELHI DEVELOPMENTAUTHORITY & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocate for Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.12687/2018(Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.12689/2018 (delay in filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. CM stands disposed of. CM No.12688/2018 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned. RFA No.301/2018 Page 1 of 15 CM stands disposed of. RFA No.301/2018 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 20.5.2017 by which...
Alpha Services vs.ircon International Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:05. 04.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 238/2016 & IA No.5634/2016 ALPHA SERVICES ........ Petitioner Versus IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU :Ms Neelima Tripathi and Ms Gunjan Singh. :Ms Leena Tuteja, Mr Ishaan Chawla and Ms Diksha Bhatia. VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner (hereafter Alpha) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act) impugning the arbitral award dated 23.12.2015 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal). The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the contract entered into by the parties, whereby Alpha had agreed to supply 35 numbers of Electric Overhead Travellin...
Mr. Mukesh Kumar vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : April 04, 2018 W.P.(C) 3222/2018 MR. MUKESH KUMAR Through: Mr.Apoorva Kumar, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. Through: Mr.Manik Dogra, Advocate for R-1 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr.Rajiv Shukla, Ms.Shivani Kapoor and Mr.Lakshay Mangla, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR CM No.12756/2018 ORDER (ORAL) Allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) No.3222/2018 & CM No.12755/2018 1.... Petitioner claims to have applied for the post of Junior Technical Assistant in response to advertisement of 20th September, 2016 (Annexure P- 2). It is the case of petitioner that the final selection result for the said post was declared on 17th April, 2017. As per the final result (Annexure P-4) pertaining to petitioner, he has not been empanelled as he was not meeting the essential qualification criteria for the post in question. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the impugned selection has...
Firoz vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-04-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 706/2017 & CRL.M.(Bail) 374/2018 FIROZ ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Archna Sharma, Advocate with and Mr.Nishant, Mr.T.S.Varun Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Amit Chadha, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER0404.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25th April 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-05 (ASJ) (South-East), Saket Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.2353/2016 arising out of FIR No.86/2011 registered at Police Station Jaitpur, convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 15th May 2017 whereby he was sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.3,000/-. Transfer of case to JJB2 At the outset, it requires to be noticed that by an order dated 19th August 2011, the charge was originally framed against the Appellant CRL.A. 706/2017 Page 1 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›
- Last »