Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Moorti Devi vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 6119/2013 MOORTI DEVI Through: Mr. I.S. Dahiya, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Deepika, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of letter dated 22.04.2013 vide which she was informed that the Recommendation Committee in its meeting held on 28.03.2013, had rejected her case for grant of an alternate plot on the ground that the application submitted by her was time barred and had not been submitted within the stipulated period of three months from the date of receipt of compensation.2. Mr. Dahiya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners mother Smt. Sudha was the recorded owner of land measuring 12 bigha 13 biswas, comprising in Khasra WP (C) No.6119/2013 Page 1 of 5 No.81/1(4-10), 93/2(1-09), 99(4-16), 103/2(0-12) & 109/2(1- 06)...
Shri Ram General Ins Co Ltd vs.umesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 19, 2018 + MAC.APP. 691/2015 & CM179372015 + MAC.APP. 692/2015 & CM179472015 + MAC.APP. 693/2015 & CM431702015 + MAC.APP. 694/2015 & CM179642015 + MAC.APP. 695/2015 & CM179672015 SHRI RAM GENERAL INS CO LTD Versus RAVI & ORS MUKESH & ORS CHAMPA & ORS UMESH & ORS SANJAY @ SANJAY KUMAR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondents Through: Ms. Guremeet Kaur Chawla, Advocate for Ms. Babita Tyagi, Advocate for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 70/2017 CHAMPA & ORS .....Appellants Through: Ms. Guremeet Kaur Chawla, Advocate for Ms. Babita Tyagi, Advocate Versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APPs. 691-95/2015 & 70/2017 Page 1 of 7 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned six appeals are directed against consolidated Award of 30th May, 2015 vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-02 (Central),...
Shree Vinayak Iron Works vs.flowmore Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2018
$~CP-49 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. 04.2018 CO.PET. 592/2015 SHREE VINAYAK IRON WORKS ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Debdut Mukherjee and Ms.Aprajit Mukherjee, Advs. versus FLOWMORE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhinav Mukerji and Ms.Purnima Krishna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) This petition is filed under Section 434 (1) (a) and Section 433 (e) of 1. the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent Company.2. It is the case of the petitioner that in compliance of certain orders placed by the respondent, the petitioner delivered goods at the site of Ganga Pollution Control Unit, UP Jal Nigam, Mahawapati Naini at Allahbad. Six invoices were raised from 21.06.2012 to 04.08.2012 for Rs.58,44,954.96/-. It is the contention of the petitioner that a balance of Rs.14,46,113.22/- remains unpaid. As the amount remained unpaid, a statutory notice was sent on 22.05.2...
Sh Harjeet Singh Bhogal & Others vs.state & Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2018
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 47/2016 SH HARJEET SINGH BHOGAL & OTHERS Through: Mr. Vinay Gupta, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus STATE & OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Mishra, Advocate for R-2 to 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA % TEST.CAS. 47/2016 and I.A. No.2719/2017 (for grant of leave and permission to petitioners for filing own valuation) 1. By this testamentary case the petitioners pray for grant of letters ORDER1904.2018 of administration with the Will annexed of late Shri Swaran Singh Bhogal. The Will is dated 15.10.2007 and is a Will which has been duly registered before the Sub-Registrar. Three petitioners are the sons of late Shri Swaran Singh Bhogal. Respondent nos. 2 to 7 are the daughters of the deceased testator late Shri Swaran Singh Bhogal. Respondent nos. 2 to 7 have filed their written statements saying that they do not object to the grant of reliefs in the present testamentary case.2. The Will dated 15.1...
Shri Ram General Ins Co Ltd vs.mukesh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 19, 2018 + MAC.APP. 691/2015 & CM179372015 + MAC.APP. 692/2015 & CM179472015 + MAC.APP. 693/2015 & CM431702015 + MAC.APP. 694/2015 & CM179642015 + MAC.APP. 695/2015 & CM179672015 SHRI RAM GENERAL INS CO LTD Versus RAVI & ORS MUKESH & ORS CHAMPA & ORS UMESH & ORS SANJAY @ SANJAY KUMAR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate .....Respondents Through: Ms. Guremeet Kaur Chawla, Advocate for Ms. Babita Tyagi, Advocate for respondents-Claimants + MAC.APP. 70/2017 CHAMPA & ORS .....Appellants Through: Ms. Guremeet Kaur Chawla, Advocate for Ms. Babita Tyagi, Advocate Versus SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APPs. 691-95/2015 & 70/2017 Page 1 of 7 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above-captioned six appeals are directed against consolidated Award of 30th May, 2015 vide which the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-02 (Central),...
Sushila Devi @ Meera & Ors vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-19-2018
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. 04.2018 FAO2632012 SUSHILA DEVI @ MEERA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Ms. Kavita Tyagi and Ms. Navneet Versus Goyal, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal impugns an order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, dated 21.02.2012, which dismissed the appellants claim for the compensation for the death of Mr.Jagdish-husband, son and father of appellant nos. 1, 2 and 3 and 4 to 8, respectively. Mr. Jagdish is stated to have been travelling in the Sirsa Express Train on 21.09.2010 which was going to Sadar Bazar from Nangloi. From his body, a travel pass bearing MST No.71888762 was found. It was valid till 16.10.2010.2. The appellants case is that due to heavy rush in the train, Mr. Jagdish fell down from it near pole No.16/8, Down line near Gate No.12 C Kirari at about 9.00 am. The fall from the train ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-18 vs.m/s. n.s. Software (Firm)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:05. 02.2018 Pronounced on:18. 04.2018 ITA7912017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-18..... Appellant Through : Sh. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Revenue. versus M/S. N.S. SOFTWARE (FIRM) ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Sudesh Garg, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % I. FACTS1 This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2009-10 against order dated 28.02.2017 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT hereafter). The question of law framed for this appeal is as follows:" Did the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fall into error in quashing the assessment on the ground that it was not based upon a notice under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961?." ITA7912017 Page 1 of 23 2. The relevant facts of the case are that on 15.03.2004, the assessee Firm was established th...
Shri Ram General Insurance co.ltd vs.aasiya Vano & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: April 18, 2018 MAC.APP. 941/2014 & CMs 17330/14, 213SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD Through: Mr. Kamal Deep, Advocate ..... Appellant versus AASIYA VANO & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 28th July, 2014 grants compensation of `22,10,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum to respondents-Claimants on account of death of one Nimal Ali @ Niyaz Ali, who had sustained fatal injuries in a vehicular accident on 9th July, 2012 at Dwarka Palam Road, near Dwarka Flyover, New Delhi. The factual background, as noticed in impugned Award, is as under: - It is the case of the petitioners that on 9.07.2012 at about 03.45 hours, the deceased met with an accident due to the rash and negligent driving of the respondent No.1 who was driving vehicle No.HR-74-7177 who hit the deceased with forceful impact and FIR No.1under S...
Shailendra Bhatnagar vs.the Registrar General, High Court of Delhi & A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~22 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1756/2018 % Date of decision :18. h April, 2018 SHAILENDRA BHATNAGAR Through :... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ANR ...... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Satyakam, ASC, GNCTD for R-2 with Mr. Abhilash Malhotra, M.M. (CD), Nodal Officer, Computer Website Committee. Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for NIC along with Mr. R.K. Kaul, Scientist F, NIC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petitioner submits that he has made applications to the authorities highlighting various issues such as the official website of Delhi District Courts having a major issue of not uploading the W.P.(C)No.1756/2018 Page 1 of 4 necessary ongoing court information i.e. cause list; daily orders; case status, judgments, and information about judges...
U P State Road Transport Corporation vs.shakuntla Devi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:18. h April, 2018 $~18 * % + MAC.APP. 119/2018 U P STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. versus SHAKUNTLA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhupesh K. Chandra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the award of the Claims Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.9,04,000/- has been awarded to respondents No.1 to 7.2. The accident dated 20th August, 2010 resulted in the death of Naval Singh. The deceased was aged 50 years at the time of the accident and was survived by his widow, two sons, three daughters and father who claimed compensation. The deceased was working as a baildar (labourer). It was claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.9,000/- per month. However, in the absence of any proof of income, the Claims Tribunal took the minimum wages of Rs.5,278/-, deducted 1/5th towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier ...