Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Paralympic Committee of India vs.naresh Kumar Sharma and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:18. 04.2018 LPA2082018, C.M. APPL.14838/2018 & 14840/2018 PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE OF INDIA .. Appellant Through: Sh. Kanwal Chaudhary and Sh. Naveen Kumar Chaudhary, Advocates with Sh. J.P. Nautiyal, Chairperson of the appellant. versus NARESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Sh. Chandan Sharma, Sh. Sumeet Anand and Sh. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocates, for Respondent No.1. Sh. Nikhil Goel and Sh. Gurpreet Hora, Advocates, for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeal has been filed by the Paralympic Committee of India (hereafter "the Committee") impugning the order of a learned single judge dated 09.04.2018 passed in a writ petition preferred by the petitioner. By the impugned order, the single judge allowed Naresh Kumar Sharma ("the petitioner") to participate in the R7 event at 2018 Korean World Championship and gav...
Dr. Mallarika Sinha Roy & Ors. Vs.jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 18, 2018 W.P.(C) 3825/2018 & CMs 15164-65-66/2018 DR. MALLARIKA SINHA ROY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ranvir Singh and Mr. Rahul Chaprana, Advocates versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioners were appointed as Wardens in the year 2012, 2013 and 2015 for a period of two years and their appointment was renewed from time to time. Vide impugned Office Orders of 19th December 2016; 16th March, 2017; 5th April, 2017; 24th August, 2017 and 19th September, 2017, petitioners were informed that their term of Wardenship had ended and so, wardens honorarium has been discontinued. Against impugned orders, petitioners had made Representations (Annexure P-8 and 9 colly.).2. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there is no response to the said Representations.3. In the facts and circumstances of th...
Radha Raman Thakur vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
I-26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 18, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3812/2018 & C.M. 15127-28/2018 1. RADHA RAMAN THAKUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Feroze Ahmed, Mr. R.S. Sharma & Mr. Ranjan Sharma, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat & Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) By way of this writ petition, reinstatement on the post of Principal, Lakshmi Devi Shroff Adarsh Sanskrit Mahavidyalya, Kalirakha B. Deoghar, Jharkhand is sought by petitioner by seeking quashing of Termination Order of 7th December, 2014 (Annexure P-15) and Order of 6th October, 2017 (Annexure P-23), vide which termination of petitioners service was approved by Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan.2. The challenge to the impugned orders of 7th December, 2014 (Annexure P-15) and 6th October, 2017 (Annexure P-23), vide which petitioner was dis...
Imv India Pvt Ltd vs.stridewel Internationalthrough Its Sole Proprieto ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~30 to 48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 192/2018 to 209/2018 & ARB.P.211/2018 Date of decision:18. h April, 2018 1. IMV INDIA PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kishan Rawat, Ms.Jayati Parasher and Mr.Rjan Narain, Advs. versus STRIDEWEL INTERNATIONALTHROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR MR.MAHESH CHAUDHRI & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Deepak Khadaria, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) These petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Invoice(s) issued by the petitioner for supply of veterinary application material and equipment made by it to the respondents. The Arbitration Agreement relied upon by the petitioner is contained on the back of the Invoice(s) in the form of Clause 5 thereof, which is reproduced...
Suraj Prakash Jain and Ors. Vs.union of India Through Land Acquisition ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~12 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:18. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3168/2018 SURAJ PRAKASH JAIN AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Rout and Mr. Aman Mehrotra, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR .... Respondent Through: Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC. Ms. Shobhana Takiar amd Mr. Udayan Khandelwal, Advocates for DMRC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.1/Land Acquisition Collector to forward the original reference petition of the petitioners dated 31.10.2014 along with a subsequent reference petition dated 10.08.2015 to the concerned Reference Court without any delay in accordance with Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as t...
Vikas Kumar vs.purshotam Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % VIKAS KUMAR RFA No.322/2018 18th April, 2018 Mr. G.D.Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant Through: versus PURSHOTAM VERMA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.15023/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions CM stands disposed of. RFA No.322/2018 & CM No.15022/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit, impugning the order of the Trial Court dated 24.8.2017, by which the trial court has decreed the Order XXXVII CPC suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff, on account of non-filing of the application for RFA No.322/2018 Page 1 of 6 leave to defend. It is not disputed on behalf of the appellant/defendant that no application for leave to defend was filed.2. The case of the appellant/defendant is that summons for judgment which were issued to t...
Prakash Dagar vs.ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) + W.P.(C) 3815/2018 & C.Ms. 15133-34/2018 Date of Order: April 18, 2018 PRAKASH DAGAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate Versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripath, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD (DOE) (ii) + W.P.(C) 3816/2018 & C.Ms.15136-37/2018 SADAKAT ALI Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS. Through: Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD (DOE) ........ RESPONDENTS (iii) + W.P.(C) 3836/2018 & C.Ms. 15200-01/2018 DAYA VATI Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jawahar Raja, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD (DOE) & Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advocate W.P.(C) 3815/2018 & connected petitions Page 1 of 4 (iv) + W.P.(C) 3837/2018 & C.Ms. 15202-03/2018 SHASHI RAWAT ........ Petit...
M/S Gupta International & Ors vs.ashok Kumar Singhal & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) No.1666/2016 + % M/s GUPTA INTERNATIONAL & ORS. 18th April, 2018 ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aquib Ali and Mr. Manik Ahluwalia, Advocate ASHOK KUMAR SINGHAL & ANR. versus ..... Defendants Through: Mr. P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate for D-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a suit for possession, mesne profits, cancellation of documents etc filed by three plaintiffs. Plaintiff no.1 is a partnership firm M/s Gupta International. Plaintiff nos. 2 and 3, and who are husband and wife, are partners of the plaintiff no.1 partnership concern. Defendant no.1 is the erstwhile partner of plaintiff no.1/partnership firm, defendant No.2 (also an erstwhile partner) is the transferee of the suit property being Shop No.4 (7ft.x CS(COMM) No.1666/2016 Page 1 of 30 30ft.) and Shop No.5 (9ft. x 30 ft.) with roof rights built on Plot nos....
Smt Anarkali & Anr vs.shri Vijay Pal Yadav & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"18th April, 2018 + MAC.APP. 861/2013 SMT ANARKALI & ANR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajnish K. Jha, Adv. versus SHRI VIJAY PAL YADAV & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Deepak Kumar, bachelor son, aged 24 years, of the first appellant, died due to the injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that occurred on 07.02.2011 on account of rash driving of the bus bearing registration No.DL-1PB-8766 (the bus), the first respondent being at the wheels, it being registered in the name of the second respondent and concededly insured against third party risk, for the period in question with the third respondent (insurer). The accident claim case (MACT922011) was instituted on 21.04.2011. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 26.04.2013, it accepted the case of the claimants, holding the bus driver responsible for th...
M/S. Aneja Construction (I) Ltd. Through Authorised Representative vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 03.2018 Pronounced on:18. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 1084/2017, C.M. APPL.4957/2017 (I) M/S. ANEJA CONSTRUCTION AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE LTD. THROUGH ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Priya Hingorani and Sh. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. G.K. Mishra and Ms. Priyanka Bakshi, Advocates, for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioner complains of arbitrariness and seeks directions for quashing of a notice inviting Tender (NIT) dated 23.02.2017 [hereafter referred to as the impugned tender]. and a direction to quash the decision of the second respondent (hereafter referred to as the NTPC) to cancel and withdraw the previous tender (dated 02.01.2016) (hereafter the first NIT).2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner is engaged in construction activity and claims ...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »