Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shailja Bahuguna vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: April 18, 2018 W.P.(C) 3806/2018 & CMs 15099-100/2018 SHAILJA BAHUGUNA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. T.Singhdev and Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for respondents No.1 & 3-UOI & SSC Mr. Apoorv Kurup and Mr.Girijopoti Koushal, Advocates for respondent No.5-UGC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Question of equivalence of Degrees is essentially the subject matter of this petition. For the post of Research Assistant, petitioner had applied and as per Select List (Annexure P-14), petitioner is at No.1 and as per the Communication of 16th /19th February, 2018 (Annexure P-15), post of Research Assistant was offered to petitioner subject to submission of Equivalence Certificate.2. Learned counsel for petitioner draws attention of this Court to Communication of 19th July, 2016 of respondent-University Grants Commission (hereinafter referr...
M/S Dadhimati Constructions vs.the Muse Sarovar Portico & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 182/2017 % Date of decision :18. h April, 2018 M/S DADHIMATI CONSTRUCTIONS Through : Mr. Abhay Anand and ..... Appellant Mr. B.K. Jha, Advs. versus THE MUSE SAROVAR PORTICO & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR Through : Ms. Bharti Baderaa, Adv. JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The instant appeal assails the order dated 13th February, 2017 whereby the ld. Single Judge has allowed four applications being I.A.Nos.22629-32/2015 filed by the respondents herein (defendants in the suit) under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of the CPC seeking leave to defend the suit. By the impugned order, the ld. Single Judge has granted unconditional leave to the respondents to defend the suit in which these applications were filed.2. The appellant (plaintiff in this suit) had instituted CS(OS)No.869/2015 under Order XXXVII of the CPC in respect of a collaborative agreement dated 1...
Chaman Singh and Ors vs.land Acquisition Collector (East) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:18. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11985/2016 CHAMAN SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Anuroop P.S., Advocate. versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (EAST) & ORS Through: Mr.R.K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent/LAC/L&B Department. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of order dated 27.07.2015 passed by the Court of Land Acquisition Collector (in short LAC)/Additional District Magistrate (in short ADM) (East), L.M. Bundh, Shashtri Nagar, Geeta Colony, Delhi by which their petition under Section 28- A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) stands dismissed on the ground that the applicant had filed an application under Section 18 of the Act for reference which stands rejected. W.P.(C) 11985/2016 Page ...
The State Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.ram Prakash @ Prakash
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and order: April 18, 2018. CRL.L.P. 96/2018 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State RAM PRAKASH @ PRAKASH versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dilip Singh, Mr. Amresh Yadav, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI % P.S. TEJI, J.(Oral) ORDER1 The present leave petition has been filed by the State under Section 378(1) of the Cr.P.C. seeking leave to appeal against the judgment dated 27.09.2017 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge -02, North, Rohini Court, Delhi in Sessions Case No.58363/2016 (Old No.27/2014) titled as State vs. Ram Prakash, arising out of FIR No.617/2013 registered under Section 302 IPC at Police Station S.P. Badli, Delhi.2. The case of the prosecution is that on the intervening night of 22nd / 23rd November 2013 at about 10.00 PM accused/responden...
Dr. Sangamitra Acharya & Anr. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P. (CRL.) 1804/2017 & CM No.9963/2017 Reserved on:17. h February, 2018 Decided on:18. h April, 2018 DR. SANGAMITRA ACHARYA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Trideep Pais with Mr. Shivam Sharma, Ms. Seema Mishra, Ms. Deeksha Gujral, Advocates. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Amicus Curiae. Mr. Rahul Mehra, standing counsel with Ms. Kamna Vohra, additional standing counsel and Mr. Prashant Singh, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Debojyoti Bhattacharya & Ms. Momata C. Bhattacharya, Advocates for R- 2, 3, 4. Mr. Mukul Talwar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar, Mr. Mrinal Kanwar & Mr. Ankit Dixit, Advocates for CIMBS. Mr. Kamlesh Mishra with Mr. Ahmad Parvez and Md. Aslam, Mr. Aditya Mishra, Advocates for ALMAS Ambulance. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR W.P. (Crl) 1804 of 2017 Page 1 of 73 JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. Important que...
Mohammad Aftab Alam vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Pronouncement:18. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 3840/2018 & CM APP Nos.15216-17/2018 MOHAMMAD AFTAB ALAM ........ Petitioner Through : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi and versus Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Adv. for R-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J (ORAL) CM APP No.15217/2018 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3840/2018 & CM APP No.15216/2018 2. Issue notice to the respondents. Mr. Rajesh Gogna accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2.1 Mr.Gogna says that in view of the order that I propose to pass today, he does not wish to file a counter affidavit in the matter.3. Briefly the petitioners case is that he was appointed as Director on the Board of Company by the name of Amenity Trading Private Limited (in short ATPL). The petitioner avers that he resigned from ATPL on 1.10.2011. For this purpose, reliance is ...
Daya Vati vs.ring Midway Senior Secondary School & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (i) + W.P.(C) 3815/2018 & C.Ms. 15133-34/2018 Date of Order: April 18, 2018 PRAKASH DAGAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate Versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripath, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD (DOE) (ii) + W.P.(C) 3816/2018 & C.Ms.15136-37/2018 SADAKAT ALI Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS. Through: Ms. Jyoti Taneja, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD (DOE) ........ RESPONDENTS (iii) + W.P.(C) 3836/2018 & C.Ms. 15200-01/2018 DAYA VATI Through: Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus RING MIDWAY SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jawahar Raja, Addl. Standing Counsel for GNCTD (DOE) & Mr. Chinmay Kanojia, Advocate W.P.(C) 3815/2018 & connected petitions Page 1 of 4 (iv) + W.P.(C) 3837/2018 & C.Ms. 15202-03/2018 SHASHI RAWAT ........ Petit...
Sandeep Tiwari vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h March, 2018 Decided on:18. h April, 2018 CRL.A. 852/2017 SANDEEP TIWARI THE STATE Represented by: Ms. Neelam Singh, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, Sandeep Tiwari challenges the impugned judgment dated 2nd June, 2017 convicting him for the offence punishable under Sections 304 Part-II IPC in FIR No.676/2016 registered at PS Aman Vihar, Delhi and the order on sentence dated 5th June, 2017 directing him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of four years.2. Assailing the conviction, learned counsel for the appellant contends that the main witnesses have not supported the prosecution case and turned hostile. Danda, the alleged weapon of offence, has not been identified either by Geeta (PW-2) or Raju (PW-3). Thus in a case of no evidence against the appellant, he has been erroneously convicted by the lea...
Anil Kumar Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: April 10, 2018 Date of decision: April 18, 2018 CRL.A. 562/2017 MANISH SHARMA @ PAPPAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Chandra, Advocate with Mr. Manoj Lohia and Mr. Deepak Mahajan, Advocates. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State. AND + CRL.A. 696/2017 & Crl.M.(Bail) 2196/2017 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sumer Kumar Sethi and Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocates. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Crl.A. Nos. 562/2017 & 696/2017 Page 1 of 38 % Introduction JUDGMENT1 These two appeals are directed against the common judgment dated 4th February 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara, Karkardooma Court, Delhi in Sessions Case No.30/2011 arising out of FIR No.288/2010 registered at Police Station (PS) Vivek Vihar, convicting both the Appellants, Anil...
Batliboi Limited vs.kiran Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-18-2018
$~ 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"18th April, 2018 RC. REV. 111/2016 and CM APPL.5721/2016, CM APPL.12186/2017 BATLIBOI LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Akshay Ringe, Ms. Megha Mukerjee, Mr. Sachin Jain, & Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Advocates versus KIRAN SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Swami, Advocate with Ms. Smarika Azad, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The respondent is the landlord qua the petitioner in respect of property described as N-197-A, Greater Kailash Part-I, New Delhi, it having been let out in the year 1976 by his mother. He had filed a case (E. No.26/2015) for eviction on 08.04.2015 on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14 (1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. Having regard to the nature of ground invoked, the procedure under Section 25-B of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was applied. In response to the special summons served on the petitioner (tenant), it...