Delhi Court April 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kaushalya Devi (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives vs.commissione ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.600/2004 % Reserved on:13. h December, 2017 Date of Decision:20. h April, 2018 KAUSHALYA DEVI REPRESENTATIVES (DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Prakash Kumar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH SANJIV KHANNA, J.This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) by Kaushalya Devi, since deceased and now represented by her legal representative, relates to assessment year 1994-95 and arises from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short) dated 5th May, 2004 in ITA No.6259/Del of 1997 and ITA No.826/Del of 1998.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 18th October, 2005, on the following substantial question of law:-"ITA6002004 Page 1 of 31 Whether ITAT was, on a ...
Frhi Hotels & Resorts s.a r.l. Vs.dr. Mukram Ulla Khan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 830/2017 & I.A.No.14500/2017 FRHI HOTELS & RESORTS S.A R.L. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Zeeshan Khan, Advocate. versus Date of Decision:20. h April, 2018 ..... Defendant None Through DR. MUKRAM ULLA KHAN % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) I.A.14500/2017 Since none appears for the defendant, despite service, the ex parte ad interim injunction order dated 07th December, 2017 is confirmed till the disposal of the present suit. CS(COMM) 830/2017 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, passing off, rendition of accounts and damages against the defendant.2. Since the defendant has neither filed his written statement nor entered appearance, he is proceeded ex parte. CS (COMM) 830/2017 Page 1 of 6 3. At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff gives up prayers 45 (c), (d), (e) and (f) of the prayer clause to the suit. He prays that in view of the...
M/S. Aps Forex Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs.shakti International Fashion Link ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h April, 2018 CRL.L.P. 258/2018 M/S. APS FOREX SERVICES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma Sharma, Parul versus and Ms. Advocates SHAKTI INTERNATIONAL FASHION LINKERS & ORS Represented by: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 7279/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exception. Crl.M.A. 7278/2018 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 62 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 258/2018 1.... Petitioner (APS Forex Services Pvt. Ltd.) filed complaint case No.6137under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short 'NI Act') alleging that in discharge of liability arising out of issuance of foreign exchange/USD card under LERM scheme vide request letters dated 10th Januray, 2014, 20th February, 2014 and 22nd February, 2014, respondent No.1 (Shakti Internat...
National Insurance Co Ltd vs.arvind Kumar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~5 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:20. 04.2018 FAO5302016 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates. versus ARVIND KUMAR & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J (Oral) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Nain, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Kundan Kumar, Advocate for R-2. FAO5302016 & CM Nos. 42350/2016, 42352/2016 & 42353/2016 The appeal impugns the order of compensation dated 17.08.2016 1. passed by the Commissioner, Employees Compensation, on the ground that the amount has been awarded to respondent No.1 a person who has not proven his employment by the R-2 the owner of insured motor vehicle. The learned counsel for the appellant relies upon the deposition of respondent no.1- the injured, who has himself stated that he was employed by his father, an employee of respondent No.2. Furthermore, respondent No.2 has stated that respondent No.1 (his injured son) was never hi...
Vandana Jain vs.rita Mathur and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % VANDANA JAIN RFA No.38/2018 20th April, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. P.D. Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advocate. Versus RITA MATHUR AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, Advocate with Ms. Rohini, Advocate and Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.38/2018 and C.M. Nos.1498/2018 (stay), 1499/2018 (for additional evidence) & 15214/2018 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 10.10.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for specific performance filed by the RFA No.38/2018 Page 1 of 33 appellant/plaintiff with respect to the Agreement to Sell dated 3.8.2011 with respect to the property bearing no.4057 to 4060 at Roshanpura, Nai ...
Vishal Yadav vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : APRIL20 2018 + W.P.(CRL) 3170/2017 & Crl.M.A.18753/2017 VISHAL YADAV ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Puneet Mittal, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.Gyanendra Singh, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) Through : Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, ASC. Mr.P.K.Dey with Ms.Shilpi Dey, Advocates, for R-2. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner-Vishal Yadav to seek parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record. The petition is contested by the respondent No.2.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.3. Undisputedly, the petitioner along with Vikas Yadav and Sukhdev Yadav was convicted by a judgment dated 28.05.2008; he was W.P.(Crl.) 3170/2017 Page 1 of 5 sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. The appeal preferred by th...
t.c. Jindgar vs.rural Electrification Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h April, 2018 + W.P.(C) 4790/2002 T.C. JINDGAR ....... Petitioner Through Mr.Sanjay Mann, Adv. versus RURAL ELECTRIFICATION CORPORATION... RESPONDENTThrough Mr.Deepak Khurana and Mr.Tejasv Anand, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT(ORAL) C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The petitioner T.C. Jindgar, while working as Deputy Chief (Engineering) in the office of the respondent-Corporation, was visited with a charge-sheet dated 28th February, 1999, proposing to hold an inquiry, against him, under Rule 25 of the REC (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1979 (hereinafter referred to the 1979 Rules) on the ground that he had failed to exhibit absolute integrity and honesty in connection with the business assigned to him and had, thereby violated Rule 5(1) and 5(9) of the 1979 Rules. W.P.(C) 4790/2002 Page 1 of 31 2. In view of the limited nature of the controversy raised by the petitioner in the present case, it ...
Delhi Development Authority vs.delhi Lighting Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.326/2018 + % DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY20h April, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Versus Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate. DELHI LIGHTING INDUSTRIES Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.15294/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.15297/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 140 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.326/2018 Page 1 of 6 RFA No.326/2018 and C.M. Nos.15295/2018 (stay) & 15296/2018 (for condonation of delay of 525 days) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) impugning the judgment of the Trial Court dated 1.2.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the ...
Arun Bhardwaj vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. h April, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 743/2018 ARUN BHARDWAJ ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Ajay Burman, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kunal Malhotra and Mr. Atul Sahi, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI Ashok Ahlawat, PS Vikaspuri. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vivek Sharma and Mr. Anshul Garg, Advocates for complainants. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.600/2016 under Sections 420/406/120B IPC registered at PS Vikas Puri, Delhi on the complaint of Kuldeep Singh.2. Allegations in the above noted FIR on the complaint of Kuldeep Singh are that he registered himself with Franchise India Pvt. Ltd. (in short FIPL) to find out a business/investment opportunity where he was introduced to alleged M/s. Sera Cue Labs Pvt. Ltd. (in sh...
Baidyanath Shukla College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-20-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 04.2018 + W.P.(C) 2256/2018 & C.M. No.9319/2018 BAIDYANATH SHUKLA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION. Through Mr.Sanjay Sherawat, Adv. ..Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Arunima Dwivedi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER2004.2018 Vide the present petition, the petitioner impugns the order dated 27th February, 2018, passed by respondent no.1 as also the order dated 5th April, 2017, passed by respondent no.2.2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties at length, this Court had on 6th April, 2018, passed the following order:-"the Vide petition, impugns present the the order dated 27th petitioner February, 2018, passed by respondent no.1 as also the order dated 5th April, 2017, passed by respondent no.2, whereby the petitioners application for grant of recognition, has been WP(C) No.2256/2018 Page 1 of 6 rejected on the ground that when the visiti...