Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rita Marwah vs.lt. Governor and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~40 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:15. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6438/2016 RITA MARWAH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anupam Singh and Mr. Akshay RInge, LT. GOVERNOR & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Akshita Manocha, Ms.Komal Sorout and Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra No.759, 764, 765, 767 total measuring 12 Bighas situated in the revenue estate of Village Malikpur Kohi @ Rang Puri, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Subject Land), stands lapsed in view of the provisions of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Re-settlem...
Shekhar Anand & Ors. Vs.suman Khurana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.129/2018 Reserved on:9. h February, 2018 Pronounced on:15. h February, 2018 SHEKHAR ANAND & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sabsachi Mishra and Ms. Vishawakapma, Bikash Advocates. versus SUMAN KHURANA ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.5206/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.129/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.5205/2018 (for stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal is filed by the appellants/defendants under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 23.11.2017 by which trial court has dismissed the leave to RFA No.129/2018 Page 1 of 5 defend application filed by the appellants/defendants and has decreed the suit filed under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs.16,00,000/- given as a friendly loan.3. The facts of the case ...
Inderjeet vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:12. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:15.02.2018 + CRL.A. 1197/2012 INDERJEET STATE & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. D.S.Kauntae, Adv. versus Through Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing counsel for BSES with Mr. Amav Vidyarthi and Ms. Anju Thomas, Advs for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal has impugned the judgment and order on sentence dated 17.09.2012 and 26.09.2012 respectively wherein the appellant Inderjeet stood convicted under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. He had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of one year and to pay a fine of CRL A. 1197/2012 Page 1 of 11 37,99,314/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for a period of six months. The civil liability computed under Section 154 (5) of the Act had worked out to 25,32,876/- which was payable with simple interest @ 6% per annum. During the ...
Brij Mohan & Ors vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~1A & 1B * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + CRL.A. 170/2002 BRIJ MOHAN & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Mukesh Kalia and Mr.Haanumant STATE SITA RAM STATE Sakhuja, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with ..... Respondent Insp. Birender Singh, P.S. Shahdara, Delhi. CRL.A. 333/2002 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with ..... Respondent Insp. Birender Singh, P.S. Shahdara, Delhi. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1502.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 18th February 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.87/2001 arising out of FIR No.212/1990, at Police Station Shahdara, whereby the appellant Sita Ram (Accused No.2: CRL.A. 170/2002 & CRL.A. 333/2002 Page 1 of 14 A-2) was convicted for the offence under Section 3IPC and Section 3IPC and the other ap...
Pranav Gandharv Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order: February 15, 2018 W.P.(C) 1349/2017 & CM No.6143/2017 PRANAV GANDHARV CHAUDHARY & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Nupur Kumar, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 Mr.Amit Yadav and Mr.Ravinder Agarwal, Advocates for R-2 Mr.Santosh Kumar and Mr.Manav Gill, Advocates for R-4 Ms.Beenashaw N.Soni and Mr.Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocates for R-5 and R-6 Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Rajeev Tiwari, Advocate for R-7 to R-11 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner-Pooja had applied for the post of Assistant Professor (Physics) in pursuance to advertisement of 3rd February, 2015 issued by the respondent-college while she was working on ad-hoc basis in the said college and she was not selected. She has impugned the selection of Assistant Professors in Physics which was made on 3rd March, 2016. In the amended writ of 18th January, 2018...
Sh. Jagmohan Bahl vs.col.(retd) K S Gupta & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~1 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"15th February, 2018 CM (M) 1103/2013 & CM Nos. 16332/2013, 12982/2014 SH. JAGMOHAN BAHL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.D.K. Rustagi & Mr. Kapil versus Gulati, Advs. COL.(RETD) K S GUPTA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Virender Kumar Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was the defendant in civil suit (suit No.177/03) instituted by the respondents (plaintiffs) herein on 13.03.2003 seeking recovery of Rs. 14,27,000/- with interest against the backdrop of a loan statedly advanced by them (plaintiffs) in 1989. The suit was decreed by the Additional District Judge by judgment dated 12.10.2010.2. The petitioner (judgment debtor) had preferred an appeal (RFA942011) against the aforesaid judgment and decree in which this Court, on the application moved by the petitioner (judgment debtor), granted by order dated 24.02.2011, a conditional stay against execution, the direction to the ...
Bal Vikas @Balmiki vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 235/2002 JAIVEER SINGH @ JAGIRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State + CRL.A. 261/2002 ASHOK KUMAR @ MANORANJAN MEHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 270/2002 ..... Respondent + BAL VIKAS @BALMIKI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Crl A Nos. 235, 261 and 270 of 2002 Page 1 of 16 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1502.2018 1. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 26th November, 2001 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.arising out of the FIR No.1regis...
Vijay Mohan vs.lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:15. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3792/2015 VIJAY MOHAN Through: Mr.Akhil Sachar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus LT. GOVERNOR, NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for respondent/LAC-L&B Department. Mr.Dhanesh Relan, Ms.Akshita Manocha, Ms.Komal & Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, for respondent/DDA. Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a writ, order or direction for quashing the impugned Notification bearing No.F.11(19)/2001/L&B/LA/20112 dated 21.03.2003 as also Notification under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. W.P. (C) No.3792/2015 Page 1 of 4 3. Mr.Jain, counsel appearin...
s.b. Jain vs.indian Co-Chairperson(secretary of Govt. Of India and Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 15, 2018 + W.P. (C) 3262/2012 1. S.B. JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Advocate versus INDIAN CO-CHAIRPERSON(SECRETARY OF GOVT. OF INDIA AND ANR.) ....Respondents Through: Ms. Shashi M. Kapila, Mr. Pravesh Sharma, Mr. Siddarth Kapila and Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Impugned order of 30th August, 2011 (Annexure- P-1) puts an end to petitioners contract of service as Manager (Administration and Accounts) with respondents and relieves him of his duties. Against impugned order of 30th August, 2011 (Annexure- P-1), petitioner had filed an appeal which stands declined vide an undated order (purportedly received by petitioner in the last week of February, 2012). It is a matter of record that petitioner was appointed as Manager (Administration and Accounts) vide Office Order of 13th April, 2009 (Annexure P-2) which stipulates that petitioners contractual ser...
The Coca-Cola Company & Anr vs.mr.dwarkanath
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~OS-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:15. 02.2018 + CS(COMM) 1475/2016 and IA No.10016/2014 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms.Kangan Roda, Ms.Kripa Pandit and Ms.Shreya Sethi, Advs. versus MR.DWARKANATH Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, its partners, employees, etc. from manufacturing, selling, marketing, etc. using the offending trade mark KWALTY and/or offending bottle shape as represented in the plaint and/or any other mark which is deceptively or confusingly similar to the registered trade mark KINLEY (label) and DANUBE BOTTLE shape of plaintiff No.1 as a trade mark or part of a trade mark or any other mark to infringe the plaintiffs trade mark. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. It is contended in the plaint that plaintiff No.1 is the registered proprietor of...