Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ravindra Memorial Public School vs.director of Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 13, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11394/2016 & C.M. 44659/2016 1. RAVINDRA MEMORIAL PUBLIC SCHOOL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Garg & Ms. Shilpa Sharma, Advocates Versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma & Mr.C.K.Bhatt, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Kamlesh Kumar & Ms. Satakshi Varma, Advocates for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR (ORAL) JUDGMENT Impugned order of 2nd September, 2016 directs reinstatement of petitioner with back wages, as respondent had attained the age of superannuation on 31st August, 2016. The facts, as noted in the impugned order, need no reproduction. Suffice to note that second respondent had joined petitioner-School as Assistant Teacher on temporary basis in the year 1988 and had rendered uninterrupted service till June, 2013. Consequent upon a departmental inquiry, second respondent was dismissed from service vide order of 6th June, ...
Satish Chand vs.rakesh Kumar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"13th February, 2018 CM(M) 810/2010 and CM APPL.10961/2018 (stay) SATISH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Agarwal, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus RAKESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Febin M. Varghese, Advocate for R-15. Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Adv. for R-17 & R-18. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand assails the judgment dated 03.05.2010 of the court of Additional District Judge in appeal (RCA No.86/2009/07) that was instituted by the first respondent on 02.07.2007 whereby the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2004 passed by Civil Judge in civil suit (198/1985) of the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner herein was challenged. The civil suit (No.198/1985) had been instituted by Smt. Shanti Devi, wife of Late Shri Ram Nath Gupta seeking the relief of permanent injunction. It is stated that, on his application under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civ...
Institute of Cellular Therapies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors vs.union of India & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:13. February 2018 + W.P.(C) 8426/2014 & CM Nos.19466/2014, 18841/2015, 5506- 5507/2018 INSTITUTE OF CELLULAR THERAPIES PVT. LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Syed Burhanur Rahman, Mr. Ishwar Mohanty and Mr. Prateek Singh Choudhary, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rishikant Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Ms. Rajeshwari H, Adv. for R-3 & 4 AND + W.P.(C) 4004/2017 & CM No.17608/2017 INSTITUTE OF CELLULAR THERAPIES PVT. LTD. & ........ Petitioner ANR Through Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Syed Burhanur Rahman, Mr. Ishwar Mohanty and Mr. Prateek Singh Choudhary, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rishikant Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 2 W.P. (C) 8426/2014 & conn. Page 1 of 3 Ms. Rajeshwari H, Adv. for R-3 & 4 CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ...
M/S Combitic Global Caplet Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s Unitech Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.130/2018 & conn. + % RFA No.130/2018 M/s COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant 13th February, 2018 Through: Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate versus M/s UNITECH LTD. RFA No.131/2018 M/s COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate versus M/s UNITECH LTD. RFA No.132/2018 M/s COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate versus M/s UNITECH LTD. RFA No.133/2018 M/s COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate RFA No.130/2018 & conn. Matters page 1 of 15 versus M/s UNITECH LTD. RFA No.134/2018 M/s COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate versus M/S UNITECH LTD. RFA No.135/2018 M/s COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocate versus M/s UNITECH LTD. RFA No.136/2018 M/...
Noor Islam @ Noorul Islam, @ Nooris vs.the State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1673/2017 Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2018 NOOR ISLAM @ NOORUL ISLAM, @ NOORIS versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent : Mr. Aashish Kumar with Mr. Amit Madaan, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. SI Pardeep Singh, PS Mahendra Park. : % ORDER1302.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) BAIL APPLN. 1673/2017 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in case FIR No.114/2017, Police Station Mahendra Park. The said FIR was initially registered under Section 363 IPC on the complaint of the mother of the girl aged BAIL APPLN. 1673/2017 Page 1 of 3 17 years. Subsequently, SectionsIPC and section 6 of POSCO Act have been added.2. The statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 is that she had gone on her own with the petitioner to his house in Patna where they performed C...
State vs.prempal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~ * % Judgment reserved on:08. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:13.02.2018 ..... Appellant Through Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for State with SI Bhoop Singh from Anti- Corruption Branch. versus + CRL.A. 93/2012 STATE IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PREMPAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate for R-2 and R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 17.12.2009 wherein the Court of Special Judge (PC Act) had acquitted the three respondents. The aforenoted three respondents had been charged for the offence under Section 7 and Section 13(1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the P.C.Act). CRL A. 93/2012 Page 1 of 23 2 The version of the prosecution is that respondent no.1 Prem Pal on the asking of respondent nos.2 and 3 (Ved Prakash and Suresh Kumar Kaushik) had accepted the bribe money of Rs.900/...
Pramod Singh Parihar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~10. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3188/2017 PRAMOD SINGH PARIHAR Through: Mr. Randhir Singh Kalkal, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate with Surg.Cdr Narayan S., Medical Officer. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER1302.2018 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the rejection of his candidature to the post of a Sailor on the ground that he was found to be medically unfit.2. A brief glance at the facts of the case is considered necessary. In November, 2015, the respondents/Indian Navy issued an advertisement inviting applications from the public at large for enrolment to the post of a Sailor. The petitioner had responded to the said advertisement by submitting an application. After qualifying in the written examination, on 08.04.2016, the petitioner underwent a primary medical examination at the Recruitment...
Sattar Ahmed & Anr. Vs.saroj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :13. h February, 2018 + RFA9922016 SATTAR AHMED & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Ch. Ranjit Singh, Advocate (M- 9810222625). SAROJ versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal and Mr. (M- Prashant Singh, Advocates 9910636932, 9810170243). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) This is a first appeal against judgment/decree dated 27th September, 1. 2016 by which the suit for possession filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) has been decreed. Notice was issued in the appeal on 4th January, 2017 on which date, the Appellants/Defendants (hereinafter, Defendants) were directed to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month to the Plaintiff towards use and occupation charges of the suit premises. The Defendants submit that the payment has been made continuously to the Plaintiff. Brief Background 2. The Defendants came into possession of the property in August, 2007 RFA9922016 Page 1 of...
Naya Samaj Appejay Parents Association and Anr vs.government of Nct of ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1011/2018 & CM Nos.4293-94/2018 NAYA SAMAJ APPEJAY PARENTS ASSOCIATION AND ANR Through: Mr.Parveen Chaturvedi with ........ Petitioners versus Mr.Dilbag Singh, Advs. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Satyakam, ASC with Dr.A.K. Tyagi, DEO, Zone-23 for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER1302.2018 Vide the present petition, the petitioner No.1 which is admittedly an unregistered association has approached this Court with the following prayers:-"a) Pass a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to the Respondent no.1 & 4 to audit the accounts of the Respondent nos.2-3 in time bound manner; and; b) Pass a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to the Respondent no.1 & 4 to furnish the audit report before this Honble Court for appropriate orders for refund of excess fee arbitrarily collected by Respondent nos.2-3; WPC No.1011/2018 Page 1 of 4 c)...
Mohan Meakin Limited vs.international Breweries (P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h February, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 115/2017 & IA142902017 MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. and Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr.P.K.Mittal, Mr.Ashish, Advs. versus INTERNATIONAL BREWERIES (P) LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Suruchi Mittal, Mr.Abhishek Gautam, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 25th February, 2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in the arbitration proceedings titled Mohan Meakin Limited vs. International Breweries (P) Ltd.2. The disputes between the parties are in relation to the Contract Brewing Agreement dated 14th June, 2001. Some of the terms and conditions of the contract that are relevant for the purpose of the present petition are reprod...