Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
s.d. Rathi vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* + % S.D. RATHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.125/2018 Reserved on:9. h February, 2018 Pronounced on:15. h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajender Singh, Advocate. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J C.M. Appl. No.5035/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.125/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.5036/2018 (for stay) 2. This Regular First Appeal is filed by the plaintiff under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 31.10.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff seeking recovery of compensation of Rs.15,20,380/- as also allotment of an alternative site in lieu of acquired land/property. RFA No.125/2018 Page 1 of 15 3. The facts of the case are that appellant/plaintiff pleaded...
Khadija Rafique vs.mohd. Naseem & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % KHADIJA RAFIQUE RFA No.833/2017 15th February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Shwetank and Mr. Vibhor versus Verdhan, Advocates. MOHD. NASEEM & ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.35760/2017 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.35761/2017 (for delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 93 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.833/2017 and C.M. Appl. No.35759/2017 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant No.2 in the RFA No.833/2017 Page 1 of 5 suit. The suit was filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff for recovery of damages for illegal occupation and for causing damage to the suit property. The ...
Rajat Gupta vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RAJAT GUPTA BAIL APPLN. 2526/2017 ........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:15. 02.2018 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Anup J.Bhambhani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Arora and Mr. Nitendra Sharma, Advs. For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Addl. PP for the State. % ORDER1502.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory Bail in case FIR No.398 of 2017 under Sections 323/341/354/354A/506/5of the IPC Police Station Kirti Nagar, New Delhi.2. The petitioner is the brother-in-law of the complainant. The allegations against the petitioner are that he inappropriately touched her and misbehaved with her when the complainant had come to the BAIL APPLN. 2526/2017 Page 1 of 3 Crime against Women Cell in pursuance to a complaint lodged by her against her husband and in-laws.3. Learned counsel for t...
s.k.jain & Ors. Vs.punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order: February 15, 2018 W.P.(C) 5147/2011 S.K.JAIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Ashok Bhalla, Advocate versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Jagat Arora and Mr.Rajat Arora, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioners representation seeking addition of past service for calculation of pensionary benefits under Regulation 26 of PNB (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as Pension Regulations of 1995) stands declined vide order of 16th March, 2011 (Annexure P-16).2. It is matter of record that when the petitioners were inducted into service, the Pension Regulations of 1995 were not in force. So, it is recorded in the impugned order that petitioners were not eligible for addition of qualifying service.3. Learned counsel for petitioners places reliance upon Indian Banks Associations Circular of 1st February, 2018 which on the basis of legal op...
Sh. Ganga Ram vs.delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~27 * + W.P.(C) 1313/2018, CM Nos.5454/2018 & 5455/2018 SH. GANGA RAM Through: Mr.R.P.S.Bhatti, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECATION BOARD AND ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Mr.Nitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate for Mrs.Avnish Ahlawat, St.Counsel for GNCTD (Services) ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER1502.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.02.2018, % 1. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting O.A.No.615/2018, filed by him for seeking directions to the respondent/DSSSB to consider his candidature for appointment to the post of Warder (Post Code-37/13), by permitting him to once again undergo a Physical Endurance Test (PET), stated to be scheduled for some additional candidates who had provisionally qualified for the PET, from 12.02.2018 to 16.02.2018, at the Sports Complex, Chhatrasal Stadium, Model Town, Delhi. W.P.(C) 1313/2018 Page 1...
Jaiveer Singh @ Jagira vs.state of n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 235/2002 JAIVEER SINGH @ JAGIRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State + CRL.A. 261/2002 ASHOK KUMAR @ MANORANJAN MEHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 270/2002 ..... Respondent + BAL VIKAS @BALMIKI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Crl A Nos. 235, 261 and 270 of 2002 Page 1 of 16 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1502.2018 1. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 26th November, 2001 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.arising out of the FIR No.1regis...
Cellular Operators Association of India and Others vs.union of India a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.7837/2016 Reserved on :3. d January, 2018 Date of decision:15. h February, 2018 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Manya Bhardwaj, Mr. Abhinav Agrawal, Ms. Gunika Gupta and Mr. Ajeet Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC & Mr. Tushar Mathur, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Sameer Jain, Jr. Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-CBEC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Cellular Operators Association of India, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, and nine others, have filed the present writ petition for quashing of Notification No.22/2015-CE(NT) dated 29th October, 2015 as violating Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 265 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and for direction that the credit accumulated ...
Unique Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.nitya Elecrocontrols Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:15. h February, 2018 UNIQUE ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. Co. Appeal No.11/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajiv Shankar Dvivedi, Mr.Praveen Singh, Mr.Utkarsh Singh, Md. Ziauddin Ahmad & Mr. Avi Batra, Advocates Kumar Versus NITYA ELECROCONTROLS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rajesh Banati & Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocates CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. Present appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956, prays for setting aside order dated 4.8.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in Co. Pet. No.896/2016, whereby the winding up petition has been admitted and direction for publication of citation and appointment of provisional liquidator has been passed. Prayer is that the aforesaid company petition be dismissed. Co.App.11/2017 Page 1 of 7 2. Briefly, facts and allegations in the petition filed by the respondent herein...
Raj Kapoor Singh and Ors. Vs.registrar General High Court of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 11264/2015 & C.M. APPL.31779/2017 RAJ KAPOOR SINGH AND ORS. .... Petitioners Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sameer Sharma, Mr. Amandeep Joshi and Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Advocates. versus REGISTRAR GENERAL HIGH COURT OF DELHI AND ANR. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Zahid Hanief, for Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Advocate, for GNCTD/Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners are employed as Judicial Assistants through exclusive promotion quota provided for the purpose in the Schedule to the Delhi High Court Establishment (Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1972. Their grievance pertains to disparity; pay fixation in the pay band II of ` 9300-34,800 (Grade Pay ` 4600/-).2. The undisputed facts are that the petitioners joined the establishment of this Court and were promoted on vario...
Hukum Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:15. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7917/2015 HUKUM SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Pranjal Saran and Mr. M.C. Verma, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Roshan Lal Goel and Ms. Cherub Goel, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/ LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Standing Counsel for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated with respect to 11 bigha 14 biswas of the land of petitioners comprised in Khasra nos.33//13/2(1-14), 14(4- 16), 17(5-04), situated in the revenue estate of village Mubarak Pur Dabas, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is de...