Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandra Devi vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 72/2018 Judgment delivered on:16. 02.2018 CHANDRA DEVI versus STATE OF NCT OF DELH ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr Amit Rathore and Mr Saurabh Kumar, Advocates. Ms. Anita Abraham, APP for the State. SI Pardeep Singh, PS Mahendra Park. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : : For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER1602.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.397/2017 under Sections 3IPC.2. The allegations are that the co-accused inflicted a knife injury on the victim at the instigation of the petitioner, the mother of the co-accused. BAIL APPLN. 72/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. The petitioner was granted interim protection on 11.01.2018, subject to joining investigation. Status report dated 13.02.2018 indicates that the petitioner did join investigation and appeared before the Investigating Officer on 12....
Mohan Prakash @ Monu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:16.02.2018 + CRL.A. 508/2011 MOHAN PRAKASH @ MONU ..... Appellant STATE Through Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Pankaj Tomar from P.S.Sarai Rohilla. + CRL.A. 1229/2011 SHANKAR @ BABU ..... Appellant STATE Through Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Pankaj Tomar from P.S.Sarai Rohilla. + CRL.A. 485/2013 TAPESH SHARMA ..... Appellant Through Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Crl A. 508/2011, Crl.A. 1229/2011 & Crl.A.485/2013 Page 1 of 9 Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Pankaj Tomar from P.S.Sarai Rohilla. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellants have impugned the judgment and order of sentence dated 14.02.2011 and 21.02.2011 respectively wherein the appellants stand convicted under Sections 393/3of the IPC as als...
Telecommunication Consultants India Ltd vs.ideb Projects (P) Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2018
$~3 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) 321/2017 & CM Nos.46205/2017, 46207/2017 Date of Decision:16. h February, 2018 TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh with Mr. Nikhilesh Krishnan, Mr. Milind Sharma, Ms. Somya Priyadarshini, Mr. Gaurav and Ms. Sushila, Advs. versus IDEB PROJECTS (P) LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V. Seshagiri, Mr. Adhish Rajvanshi and Mr. Dakshyani Saxena, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal, filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act, 1996), assails the order dated 30th August, 2017 by the ld. Single Judge dismissing I.A. No.16401/2015 in OMP No.436/2015.2. By way of this application, filed under Section 34(3), the appellant had sought condonation of delay of a period of 38 days in filing the objections under Section 34...
National Investor Forum Regd vs.golden Forests India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1399/2010 Date of decision:15. 02.2018 NATIONAL INVESTOR FORUM REGD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak K. Singh, Adv. for applicant in CM2838586/2017 Mr. Amol Kokane, Adv. for applicant in CM12506/2017, 18045/2017 versus GOLDEN FORESTS INDIA LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Adv. for Committee GFIL. Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv. with Mr. Piyush Chaudhary, Adv. for EPFO. Mr. Abhishek Baid, Adv. for SEBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % CM125062017 (For setting aside order dated 08.07.2016) 1. The applicants are aggrieved by an order of the Committee appointed to oversee the finances and affairs of the Golden Forest Group Companies by the Supreme Court. The mandate inter alia of WP(C) 1399/2010 Page 1 of 7 the Committee was to identify the properties of the group companies, put them to sale and realize the consideration. The...
Bal Kishan and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:15. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 861/2015 BAL KISHAN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Pranjal Saran, Mr.Rajesh Gupta and Mr.M.C.Verma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, ASC (GNCTD) with Ms.Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr.Siddharth Panda, Advocate for respondent/LAC-L&B Department. Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, ASC for GNCTD with Mr.Parth Vashishtha, Advocate for respondent nos.6 & 7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings in respect of the land comprised in Khasra No.23//13/2(1-10) and 23//18/2(3-5) total measuring 4 bighas 15 biswa situated in the revenue estate of village Mubarakpur Dabas, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subje...
Ravinder Kumar Jain vs.the Director of Education, Govt. Of Nct of Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 15, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5946/2016 1. RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Shravan Dev, Advocate with petitioner in person Versus THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Advocate for respondent No.1-DoE Mr. Amit Dayal, Advocate for respondents No.3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner, who was working as Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Social Science, had submitted an application for re-employment on 26th August, 2011, as he was to superannuate on 30th November, 2011.... Petitioners application for re-employment was approved by Management Committee of respondent-School in its meeting held on 17th September, 2011 and petitioners case for re-employment for two years was forwarded to respondent- Directorate of Education on 24th December, 2011 and objections raised by respondent Directorate of Education W.P.(...
M/S Garware Wall Ropes Ltd. Vs.commissioner of Salex Tax & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~24. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) No.1268/2000 Date of decision:15. h February, 2018 M/S GARWARE WALL ROPES LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Yogesh Kumar Jagia & Mr. Amit Sood, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF SALEX TAX & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC & Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Advocate alongwith Mr. Rajesh Rawal, AVATO. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The petitioner, M/s Garware Wall Ropes Limited, is a company, which was registered under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. During the relevant period in question, i.e., Assessment Year 1995-96, the petitioner was engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of all kinds of ropes, cardage strings and twines.2. The petitioner impugns the notice dated 9th November, 1999 issued by the Sales Tax Officer for the Assessment Year 1995-96 under Section 24 of the Delhi Sales...
Ashok Kumar @ Manoranjan Mehto vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~3 to 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 235/2002 JAIVEER SINGH @ JAGIRA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State + CRL.A. 261/2002 ASHOK KUMAR @ MANORANJAN MEHTO ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State CRL.A. 270/2002 ..... Respondent + BAL VIKAS @BALMIKI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, DHCLSC with Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate. STATE versus Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA Crl A Nos. 235, 261 and 270 of 2002 Page 1 of 16 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1502.2018 1. These appeals are directed against judgment dated 26th November, 2001 passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Sessions Case No.arising out of the FIR No.1regis...
M/S Abhipra Capital Ltd. Vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Investi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA6762005 % Reserved on:17. h January, 2018 Date of Decision:15th February, 2018 M/S ABHIPRA CAPITAL LTD. ..... Appellant Through Taneja and Mr. Rohit Kumar Gupta, Advocates. Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Mr. Ashwani versus DEPUTY (INVESTIGATION) COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Through ..... Respondent Ms. Lakshmi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.The present appeal by M/s Abhipra Capital Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) relates to assessment year 1996-97 and arises from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short ) dated 28th January, 2005 in ITA No.5352/Del/1998.2. The appeal was admitted for hearing vide order dated 7th March, 2006, on the following substantial question of law:-"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the ITAT was correct in law in holding that members fee of Rs.5 Lacs paid by the appellant to ...
Pnb Finance and Industries Limited vs.late Shri Shital Prasad Jain & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h February, 2018 + RFA4272014 & CM APPL.9709-10/2017, 16368/2017 & 16570-71/2017 PNB FINANCE AND INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manish Srivastava and Mr. Rohan Malik, Advocates. versus LATE SHRI SHITAL PRASAD JAIN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A. K. Singla, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vipul Pankaj Sanghi and Ms. Ananya Kar Sanghi, Advocates. for R-1B. Mr. D. K. Rustagi, Mr. Mayank Rustagi and Mr. Kapil Gulati, Advocate for R-3 to 5. Mr. Samrat Nigam, Advocate for R-5. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1.2. Both the parties have no objection if the matter is heard by this Bench. Appellant/Plaintiff- PNB Finance & Industries Limited (hereinafter, Plaintiff) instituted a suit for recovery of Rs.19,55,890/- against five defendants. The date of filing of suit is 10th December 1976. The Defendant No.1 was the person who had actually...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »