Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fauzia Siddiqui vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~44 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h February, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate. + W.P.(C) 12180/2016 FAUZIA SIDDIQUI versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner i.e. Plot No.H-19, Abdul Fazal Enclave, Part-II, Shaheen Bagh, Okhla, New Delhi comprised in Khasra Nos. 409, admeasuring 160 Sq. Yards in the revenue State of Village Jasola, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Land) is deemed to have been lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Res...
Suresh Kumar vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 182/2002 SURESH KUMAR Reserved on: February 05, 2018 Decided on: February 19, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae and Mr. Rajeev Gaur Naseem, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP. ..... Respondent JUSTICE I. S. MEHTA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 28th February 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in Sessions Case No.13 of 1999 in FIR No.433/1998 registered at Police Station (P.S.) Moti Nagar convicting the Appellant for the offence of the murder of his wife, Mamta (deceased), punishable under Section 302 IPC and the order on sentence of the same date sentencing him to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment (RI) for one year. Case of the prosecution 2. The prosecution case began with Head Constable (HC) ...
Public Information Officer Tihar Jail vs.om Prakash Gandhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 621/2017& CM No.2830/2017 PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER TIHAR JAIL Through: Mr Satyakam, Addl. ........ Petitioner Standing Counsel, GNCTD. versus OM PRAKASH GANDHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr O. P. Gandhi, Respondent no.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1902.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner impugns an order dated 29.09.2016 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by the Central Information Commission (hereafter the CIC) in an appeal preferred by respondent no.1 under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereafter the Act).2. By the impugned order, the CIC has directed the jail authorities (Tihar Jail) to pay compensation to respondent no.1 at the rate of 2,500/- per day for the period of four days that he had been detained in custody despite being granted bail by the concerned Court. The jail authorities have also been directed to pay a cost of 1000/- to respondent no.1 for a...
Ashish Singh & Anr vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9032/2017 & CM.APPL369402017 ASHISH SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :19th February, 2018 Through Mr. Vishal Maan with Mr. Vishesh versus Wadhwa, Advocates. CORAM: GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. P.K. Saxena, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceeding with respect to land of petitioners comprised in Khasra nos.52//19 (2-8) and 74//1(1-12) admeasuring 4 bighas, situated in the revenue estate of village Karala, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stands lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement...
Naval Kishore @ Naval vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 12/2013 Reserved on: January 16, 2018 Decided on: February 19, 2018 NAVAL KISHORE @ NAVAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raj Pal Singh, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru and Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APPs Inspector Sunil Kumar, PS Anand Parbat. AND CRL. A. 184/2013 & CRL.MA. 6795/2017 DEVENDER @ PAPPU & ANR Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. ..... Appellants STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru and Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APPs Inspector Sunil Kumar, PS Anand Parbat. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are against the impugned judgment dated 9th October 2012 Crl.A. 12/2013 & Crl.A. 184/2013 Page 1 of 28 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.11/2011 arising out of FIR No.03/2011 registered at PS Anand Parbat convicting the Appellants for the offence under Section 3...
Satvir and Ors. Vs.the Land Acquisition Collector
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8135/2016 SATVIR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Bhagwat Parshad Gupta and Mr.Priyanshu Aggarwal, Advocates. versus THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Mr. Ms.Snehlata Mall, Advocate. Satish Kumar, Advocate with CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra Nos.(1-04), 34 (0-08),(1-04), total admeasuring 02 Bigha 16 Biswas in the revenue State of Village Behlopur, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Subject land) is deemed to have been lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Ac...
Mahesh Chander Ahuja vs.tilak Raj Ahuja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h January 2018 Date of decision :19th February, 2018 RFA8732016 & CM APPL. 41372/2016 MAHESH CHANDER AHUJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr.Rajesh Bhatia, Advocate. versus TILAK RAJ AHUJA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Atul Bandhu, Mr. Karan Ahuja, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Advocates. Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 A suit for partition was filed by Mr. Tilak Raj Ahuja Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) against his brother Mr. Mahesh Chander Ahuja Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant). Both are sons of Late. Sh. Harbans Lal Ahuja (hereinafter, father) who was the owner of property No.J-13/9, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi (hereinafter, suit property). The mother of the parties is Smt. Chanan Devi Ahuja (hereinafter, mother).2. It is the case of the Plaintiff that his father had passed away on 19th November, 1978 and his mother had passed away on 20th June, 1999. Upo...
Sonu@matka vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 25th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. 1151/2016 VIKAS STATE + CRL.A. 104/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent NEERAJ@KARAN STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 82/2017 SONU@MATKA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT Crl.A. Nos. 1151/2016, 104/2017 & 82/2017 Page 1 of 79 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellants, before us, were convicted, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), vide judgment dated 16th July 2016, for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 3and 396 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I...
Sunita Sharma vs.santosh Shukla
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h February 2018 + RFA5452015 SUNITA SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anand Singh, Advocate. versus (M:9868347568) SANTOSH SHUKLA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate. (M:9811161525) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM No.15296/2015 (filing of additional documents) 1. By way of this application, Appellant seeks to bring on record the copy of the record slip in respect of the cheque book from which the cheques were issued to the Plaintiff as also the copy of the legal notice dated 7th December, 2009 on record.2. A perusal of the documents reveals that the same are relevant for the adjudication of the appeal and this application was filed at the initial stage of the appeal itself. The said documents are taken on record.3. Application is allowed and disposed of in the above terms. CM No.20167/2017 (condonation of delay) 4. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in d...
Hari Om vs.m/s. Balaji Mech-Tech Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 1535/2018 HARI OM ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Niraj Kumar Mishra, Advocate. versus Through: Nemo. M/S. BALAJI MECH-TECH PRIVATE LIMITED...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 6301/2018 Exemptions granted subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 6302/2018 There is a delay of 213 days in re-filing the present writ petition. The delay of 213 days in re-filing the writ petition is condoned for justifiable reasons explained in the application. The application is disposed of. W.P. (C) 1535/2018 1. Challenge in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to the award dated 10.03.2017 passed by the Pilot Court/Presiding Officer, Labour Court-XVII, Karkardooma Court, Delhi (in short Industrial Adjudicator) in a case vide LIR No.6862/2016 (old ID7608) in which the reference order dated 05.05.2008 issued by the Government of W.P (C) 1535/...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »