Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited vs.rvr Projects Private Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~OS-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:01. 02.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 43/2018 BRAHMAPUTRA CRACKER AND POLYMER LIMITED Through Mr.N.L.Ganpathi and Mr.Shaleen Srivastava, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus RVR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sridhar Potaraju, Mr.Prabhat and Ms.Ankita Sharma, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This order is passed in continuation with the order dated 31.1.2018. I have heard learned counsel for the respondent. The contents of the order dated 31.1.2018 are somewhat repeated herein for the sake of continuity of the order.2. This petition is filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking to set aside a part of the Award dated 15.11.2017 passed by the learned Arbitrator.3. The brief facts which come out from the petition are that the petitioner is a Central Public Sector Enterprise for the Government of India. It ha...
Vijay Kumar vs. Varun Khullar & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos. 45/2018 & 48/2018 1st February, 2018 RFA No.45/2018 & CM No.1799/2018 (stay) and CM No.+ % 1. 1800/2018 (Exemption) VIJAY KUMAR ..... Appellant Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate. Through: versus VARUN KHULLAR & ANR.2. RFA No.48/2018 & CM No.1926/2018 (stay), CM No.1927/2018 (Exemption) and CM No.1928/2018 (for delay of 27 days in re-filing) VIJAY KUMAR ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Mr. Prag Chawla, Advocate. Through: versus VARUN KHULLAR & ANR. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ........ RESPONDENTS To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. These two appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) are filed against the self-same impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated 23.9.2017. By the impugned RFA Nos.45/2018 & 48/2018 Page 1 of 17 judgment the suit for partition filed by the plaintiff/respondent no.1/Sh. Varun Khullar has been decreed and the counter-claim filed by the appellant...
Nyay for Social Justice vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 606/2018 & CM No.2659/2018 % Date of Decision:1. t February, 2018 NYAY FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE Through: Mr. V.K. Pandey, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for UOI. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Niti Jain, Mr. Ranan, Mr. Kanishk Abhishek, for GNCTD /R-2 to 7. Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition filed in public interest points out harassment being caused to the senior citizens by their sons and daughters-in-law.2. In this case, the legislature has enacted Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The writ petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent nos.1 to 6 to constitute a committee/board to examine the complaints by the senior citizens against such sons and daughters-in-law and to ensure that no threat W.P.(C) No.606/2018...
Om Prakash and Ors vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:1. t February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 591/2015 OM PRAKASH & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: None. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. None has been appearing for the petitioner despite the matter has been passed over once and called for the second time.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to land of the petitioners comprised in Khasra No.43, measuring 3 Bigha 12 Biswas, situated in the revenue estate of Village Mahipalpur, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'Subject Land') stand lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation...
Jitender Bhasin vs.commissioner of Customs & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2018
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CUSAA-47/2017 Date of decision:1. t February, 2018 JITENDER BHASIN ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pradeep Gupta, Mr. Parinav Gupta, Ms. Mansi Gupta and Mr. Moazzam Ali, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Sr. Standing Cousnel for Customs with Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Appellant, Jitender Bhasin, has filed the present appeal under Section 130A of the Customs Act, 1962 (Act, for short) impugning orders dated 20th October, 2014 and 2nd February, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal for short) in appeal No.57641/2013.2. The aforesaid appeal has a rather peculiar history, and has resulted in anomalous and confusing orders of the Tribunal as noted below.3. By order dated 11th December, 2017, we had framed the following substantial question of...