Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S P Babbar vs.romi Maggo & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + DECIDED ON : FEBRUARY15 2018 CRL.L.P. 113/2018 S P BABBAR ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Ashish Kumar Das, Advocate. versus ROMI MAGGO & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.No.2847/2018 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A.No.2848/2018 (Delay) 1 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 99 days in filing the leave petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. CRL.L.P. 113/2018 1. Present leave petition has been preferred by the petitioner to challenge the legality and correctness of an order dated 26.08.2017 of learned ACMM (SW); Dwarka Courts in Complaint Case No.73/1/14. Crl.L.P.113/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have examined the file. On perusal of the file, it reveals that a complaint case was filed by the petitioner...
Raj Rani Garg vs.lt Governor,nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:15. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 11147/2015 RAJ RANI GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Akhil Sachar, Advocate versus LT GOVERNOR,NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain and Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advts. for LAC/L&B. Mr.Dhanesh Relan and Ms.Akshita Manocha, Advts. for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a declaration that the acquisition proceedings initiated with respect to land of the petitioner measuring 1 bigha out of Khasra no.50/(0-06) and (0-14) min situated in the revenue estate of village Pehladpur Bangar, National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, ...
Mukesh Khurana vs.rameshwar Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % MUKESH KHURANA RFA No.121/2018 Reserved on :09. h February, 2018 Pronounced on :15. h February, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Irfan Ahmed, Advocate. versus RAMESHWAR SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J CM No.4815/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.4816/2018 (Delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.121/2018 & CM No.4814/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant no.2 in the RFA No.121/2018 Page 1 of 8 suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 20.9.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondent no.1/plaintiff in terms of the following relief clause...
Neeraj Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~28 * + W.P.(C) 1407/2018 & CM No.5840/2018 NEERAJ KUMAR Through: Mr.Raj Singh Phogat, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Ms.Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Ms.Sakshi Agarwal & Mr.Ruchir Ranjan Rai, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS ORDER1502.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 03.03.2015, % 1. passed by the Commandant, 3rd Battalion, ITBP, removing him from service w.e.f. 03.03.2015, on account of his being a Deserter and treating the period of his absence from 28.09.2014 to 02.03.2015 i.e. for 156 days as dies non for all purposes.2. The petitioner is also aggrieved by an Office Memorandum dated 11.10.2017, issued by the DIG, Regional Headquarter, Bareilly, ITBP informing him that he had been removed from service vide order No.3945 dated 03.03.2015 and as per the provisions of Rule 28 of ITB Police Rules 1994, he ought to file an appeal, ...
Naresh Kumar vs.nitin Luthra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NARESH KUMAR RFA No.169/2018 15th February, 2018 Through: Mr. S.B. Sharma, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus NITIN LUTHRA CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA ..... Respondent To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.5706/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.5707-08/2018 (for delays) 2. For the reasons stated in the applications, the delays of 12 days in filing the appeal and 4 days in re-filing the appeal are condoned, subject to just exceptions. C.Ms. stand disposed of. RFA No.169/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.5705/2018 (for stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit RFA No.169/2018 page 1 of 9 impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 6.9.2017 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff by dismiss...
Sita Ram vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~1A & 1B * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + CRL.A. 170/2002 BRIJ MOHAN & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Mukesh Kalia and Mr.Haanumant STATE SITA RAM STATE Sakhuja, Advocates. Versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with ..... Respondent Insp. Birender Singh, P.S. Shahdara, Delhi. CRL.A. 333/2002 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Versus Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with ..... Respondent Insp. Birender Singh, P.S. Shahdara, Delhi. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1502.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 18th February 2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.87/2001 arising out of FIR No.212/1990, at Police Station Shahdara, whereby the appellant Sita Ram (Accused No.2: CRL.A. 170/2002 & CRL.A. 333/2002 Page 1 of 14 A-2) was convicted for the offence under Section 3IPC and Section 3IPC and the other ap...
s.c. Chugh vs.n.t.p.c. And Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order: February 15, 2018 W.P.(C) 2582/2014 S.C. CHUGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pradeep Gupta, Mr.Parihav Gupta, Ms.Mansi Gupta and Mr.Moazzam Ali, Advocates versus N.T.P.C. AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajesh Gupta, Advocate for R-1 Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Mr.Abhishek Rana and Mr.Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates for R-2 to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL)... Petitioner, upon his absorption in respondent-NTPC had retired in the year 1997 and had received the terminal benefits. It is so evident from letter of 17th December, 1997. It is matter of record that petitioner had approached Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi to declare him as a Central Government employee but was unsuccessful and the Division Bench of this Court vide order of 2nd August, 2010 (Annexure P-10) in W.P.(C) No.1785/2004 has confirmed that petitioner was permanently absorbed in NTPC with effect from 1st April, 1978. Ho...
Poonam Verma & Anr vs.shanta Satija
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-15-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h February, 2018 CM(M) 871/2015 POONAM VERMA & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishwendra Verma, Mr. K.C. Verma and Ms. Shivali, Advocates versus SHANTA SATIJA Through: Respondent in person ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The proceedings to which the present petition relates arise out of civil suit (CS No.178/2014) which was instituted by the respondent (plaintiff) against the petitioners (defendants) seeking relief in the nature of declaration and permanent injunction.2. It is undisputed that the plaintiff was the owner of property bearing no.292, Village Shalimar Bagh falling in the revenue estate of Village Haiderpur, Delhi-110 088 on the date a document in the nature of sale deed was executed and registered on 08.03.2013 by her whereby the said property was shown to be sold for a total consideration of Rs.13,00,000/- in favour of the defendants. The plaintiffs case before the t...
Interglobe Aviation Limited & Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA162018 and CM APPL. 1424/2018 Reserved on:24. 01.2018 Date of decision:13. 02.2018 IN THE MATTER OF: INTERGLOBE AVIATION LIMITED & ANR. * + ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocates with Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Mr. Arjun Krishnan, Mr. Ashish Tiwari, Mr. Ankur Singh and Mr. Sumit Srivastava, Advocates UNION OF INDIA AND ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Ms. Rabiya Singh Thakur and Ms. Shalini Nair, Advs. for R-1/UOI and R-4/DGCA. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Vijaya Lakshmi Menon, Mr. Anish Kapur and Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Advocates for R-2/DIAL. Mr. Digvijay Rai with Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates for R-3/AAI. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocate for R-5/Spicejet. Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul and Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Ms. Meghna Mishra and Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia, Advocates for R-6/GoAir. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. J...
Hsil Limited vs.max Ceramic Industries and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~4,5&6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1082/2016 & IAs No.9787/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), 14190/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC), 15316/2016 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC), 15317/2016 (under Order VII Rule 10 CPC), 15318/2016 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC), 917/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC), 13696/2017 (under Section 151 CPC), 14013/2017 (under Order VI, Rule 17 CPC) & 14088/2017 (under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC) + HSIL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Ms. Esha Dutta & Mr. Sahil Garg, Advs. IMPERIAL CERAMIC AND ANR Versus ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Meera Kaura Patel & Ms. Lata Singh, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 1087/2016 & IAs No.9818/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), 15291/2016 (under Order VII Rule 10 CPC), 15292/2016 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC) , 914/2017, 13692/2017 (under Section 151 CPC), 14014/2017 (under Order XI Rule 1(5) & 14015/2017 (under Order VI Rule 17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through:...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »