Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Babu Ram vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~12 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 3570/2015 BABU RAM Through: Mr.Vivekanand Mishra, Advocate with Mr.Vipul Aggarwal, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocate for Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned the Award dated 29.10.2014 passed in ID No.45/2014 (Old ID No.738/2013) by which the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as Industrial Adjudicator) answered the reference dated 28.10.2013 against him.2. The brief facts leading to filing of the present writ petition are that the Secretary (Labour), Govt. Of NCT, Delhi vide order No.No.F-24 (516)Lab./SD/2013/21166 dated 28.10.2013 referred the industrial disputes between the parties for adjudication to the Labour Court on the following terms: - Whe...
Jacintha Brown vs.syed Sajid Ali
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h February 2018 + RFA3522015 JACINTHA BROWN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Punit K. Bhalla & Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocates (M-9810080772) along with Appellant in person. versus SYED SAJID ALI Through: Respondent 9717175051). ..... Respondent (M- person in CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J (Oral) 1. The Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) had filed a suit for damages on account of defamation, mental torture, harassment, etc. against the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter, Defendant) praying for a decree to the tune of Rs.15 lakhs. The origin of the case was a complaint by the Defendant against the Plaintiff, that he had used improper language with her and she had thus alleged sexual harassment.2. Summons were issued in the suit on 28th January, 2012. Defendant entered appearance on 2nd May, 2012 through counsel. However, subsequently the Defendant stopped appearing in the matter and on 29th Augus...
Ashwani Kumar Sharma vs.the Chief Information Commissioner and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : February 13, 2018 W.P.(C) 1327/2018 & CM No.5532/2018 ASHWANI KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajat Arora and Mr.Niraj Kumar, Advocates versus THE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Ms.Adrija Thakur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Recommendations of Internal Complaints Committee of first respondent rendered on 23rd September, 2016 are assailed in this petition on the ground that the complaint of sexual harassment lodged against petitioner who was then Deputy Registrar to the Information Commissioner is a counterblast to petitioners prior complaint against the complainant. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that against the impugned recommendations (Annexure P-16), petitioner had filed a representation on 17th November, 2016 which stands declined vide impugned order (Annexure P-17) on 1st December, 2016.2. Upon...
Kundan Ram Alias Kundan Singh vs.land Acquisition Collector / a.d.m. A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:13. h February, 2018 + W.P.(C) 7299/2016 KUNDAN RAM @ KUNDAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Pankaj Vivek with Ms.Manpreet and Mr.Atul Tripathi, Advocates. versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR / A.D.M. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Siddharth Panda, Advocate for respondent/LAC. Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel with Mr.Hem Kumar, Advocate for respondent/DDA. Mr.Virender Pratap Singh Charak and Ms.Shubhra for respondent no.4/UOI. Parashar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land i.e. residential plot no.5 area measuring 100 square yards out of Khasra No.62(5-11...
Hsil Limited vs.imperial Ceramic and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~4,5&6 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1082/2016 & IAs No.9787/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), 14190/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC), 15316/2016 (under Order I Rule 10 CPC), 15317/2016 (under Order VII Rule 10 CPC), 15318/2016 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC), 917/2017 (under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC), 13696/2017 (under Section 151 CPC), 14013/2017 (under Order VI, Rule 17 CPC) & 14088/2017 (under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC) + HSIL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manav Gupta, Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Ms. Esha Dutta & Mr. Sahil Garg, Advs. IMPERIAL CERAMIC AND ANR Versus ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Meera Kaura Patel & Ms. Lata Singh, Advs. AND CS(COMM) 1087/2016 & IAs No.9818/2016 (under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC), 15291/2016 (under Order VII Rule 10 CPC), 15292/2016 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC) , 914/2017, 13692/2017 (under Section 151 CPC), 14014/2017 (under Order XI Rule 1(5) & 14015/2017 (under Order VI Rule 17 CPC) HSIL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through:...
Institute of Cellular Therapies Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs.union of India & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~18 & 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:13. February 2018 + W.P.(C) 8426/2014 & CM Nos.19466/2014, 18841/2015, 5506- 5507/2018 INSTITUTE OF CELLULAR THERAPIES PVT. LTD. & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Syed Burhanur Rahman, Mr. Ishwar Mohanty and Mr. Prateek Singh Choudhary, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rishikant Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 2 Ms. Rajeshwari H, Adv. for R-3 & 4 AND + W.P.(C) 4004/2017 & CM No.17608/2017 INSTITUTE OF CELLULAR THERAPIES PVT. LTD. & ........ Petitioner ANR Through Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Syed Burhanur Rahman, Mr. Ishwar Mohanty and Mr. Prateek Singh Choudhary, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Mr. Rishikant Singh, Adv. for R-1 & 2 W.P. (C) 8426/2014 & conn. Page 1 of 3 Ms. Rajeshwari H, Adv. for R-3 & 4 CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ...
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.subodh Chand Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :5. h February 2018 Date of decision :13. h February, 2018 + RFA1772017 & CM No.6067/2017 (stay) THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur (M:9810081811) Joshi Himanshu and (M:8126008110), Advocates. Mr. versus SUBODH CHAND GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vichitra Kumar (M:9350288356) Kumar and (M:9250727154), Advocates. Dinesh Mr. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeal arises out of judgment dated 19th September, 2016 by which the suit of the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) was decreed for a sum of Rs.7 Lakhs along with the interest @ 9% per annum from the date of accident i.e. on 4th March 2011 till realisation.2. Plaintiff is in the business of running LPG carriers. An insurance policy was obtained by the Plaintiff for the LPG fuel container vehicle bearing No.HR-38-P-0231 from the Appellant/Defendant (hereinafter, Insurance Company)....
Rudal Yadav vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :16. h JANUARY, 2018 DECIDED ON :13. h FEBRUARY, 2018 ..... Appellant ..... Respondent CRL.A. 725/2008 Through: Mr. A.K. Mishra, Advocate. RUDAL YADAV THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG versus + S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.552/2008 titled Ramesh Sharma & Ors. vs. State (Govt. of NCT (S.P.GARG) JUDGE of Delhi) . FEBRUARY13 2018 / tr...
Sanjeev Kumar vs.mansha Education Society, Through: Its President and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 13, 2018 + W.P.(C) 1342/2018 & C.Ms. 5559-60/2018 1. SANJEEV KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Charanjeet Singh & Ms. Manu Parashar, Advocates Versus MANSHA EDUCATION SOCIETY, THROUGH: ITS PRESIDENT AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal & Mr. Ashutosh Dixit, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 Ms. Ruchira Gupta & Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR... Petitioner is a Post Graduate Teacher (Physics) with respondent- ORDER (ORAL) School, who has been suspended vide impugned order of 23rd December, 2017 (Annexure P-1), against which he had sent a Representation of 30th December, 2017 (Annexure P-5 colly) to respondent-School and to respondent- Directorate of Education.2. According to petitioners counsel, there is no response to above said Representation of 30th December, 2017 (Annexure P-5 colly).3. Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Advocate, appearing for respond...
Sarabjit Ahooja vs.parul Rastogi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2018
$~23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"13th February, 2018 CM(M) 34/2018 SARABJIT AHOOJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S. Chakraborty, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus PARUL RASTOGI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Saurabh Jhamb, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Caveat No.12/2018 Since the caveator has appeared through Mr. Saurabh Jhamb, Advocate, the caveat stands discharged. CM(M) 34/2018 and CM APPL.799/2018 (for interim orders), CM APPL.3194/2018 (for directions) 1. The civil suit (CS No.1227/2016) from which these proceedings arise was instituted by the respondent against three defendants that include the petitioner herein, in the year 2013 seeking reliefs of possession, injunction permanent and mandatory, recovery of rent, mesne profits and damages. The issues were framed in the suit on 24.02.2014 whereafter it had entered trial. Two witnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) were examined on 09.01.2015 when their...