Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sukanta Roy Chowdhury vs.agriculture Insurance Co. Of India Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : February 19, 2018 W.P.(C) 1519/2018 & CM No.6217/2018 SUKANTA ROY CHOWDHURY Through: Mr.Puneet Verma, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus AGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO. OF INDIA LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Madan Gera, Advocate for R-1 and R-3 Mr.Ripu Daman Singh Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr.Pradeep Jha, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of Advertisement of January, 2018 (Annexure P-8) vide which applications have been invited for the post of Appointed Actuary on contract basis is sought by petitioner on the ground that despite being fully eligible in-house candidate, he has not been considered for the said appointment. A mandamus is sought to respondents to consider petitioners name for the post of Appointed Actuary on permanent basis in reference to Advertisement of January, 2018.2. It is matter of record that respondent had earlier issued Advertisement of 10th June, 2017 for ...
Pankaj Gupta vs.land Acquisition Collector (North) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1979/2016 Date of Judgment :19th February, 2018 PANKAJ GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Anuroop P.S., Advocate. versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (NORTH) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceeding with respect to land of petitioner comprised in Khasra nos.(3-11) and (4-16), situated in the revenue estate of village Khera Kalan, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) stands lapsed in view of section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act) as neither physical ...
Shri Sirajuddin vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~33 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h February, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate. SHRI SIRAJUDDIN + W.P.(C) 8130/2016 versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra Nos. 409 admeasuring 875 Sq. Yards in the revenue State of Village Jasola, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) is deemed to have been lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act), as neither the physical possession has been taken nor comp...
Neeraj@karan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 25th, 2017 Judgment pronounced on: February 19th, 2018 + CRL.A. 1151/2016 VIKAS STATE + CRL.A. 104/2017 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M. L. Yadav, Adv. versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent NEERAJ@KARAN STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent + CRL.A. 82/2017 SONU@MATKA STATE ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, (DHCLSC) versus Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % JUDGMENT Crl.A. Nos. 1151/2016, 104/2017 & 82/2017 Page 1 of 79 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The appellants, before us, were convicted, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma (hereinafter referred to as the learned ASJ), vide judgment dated 16th July 2016, for offences punishable under Sections 302/34, 3and 396 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as I...
Gcmc Gaay Chhap Masala Company vs.m/s Radha Kishan Gobind Ram Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~56 * % + CORAM: Date of Judgment:19. h February, 2018 ..... Appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 31/2018 GCMC GAAY CHHAP MASALA COMPANY M/S RADHA KISHAN GOBIND RAM LTD Through versus Through Mr. S.K. Bansal, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri & Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocates. Mr. Sanjeev Singh with Mr. Vikas Aggarwal, Director. ..... Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL63292018 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 31/2018 3. Present appeal is directed against the order dated 12.01.2018, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in CS (Comm) 28/2018, by which an ex-parte ad interim injunction was granted in favour of the respondent herein (plaintiff in the suit). While passing the impugned order, a local Commissioner was also appointed for search and seizure of the impugned goods.4. The appe...
Green Facade Solutions Pvt Ltd vs.odeon Builders Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h February, 2018 CS(COMM) 916/2016, IA No.1544/2017 (u/O VII R-11 CPC) and IA No.1545/2017 (for condonation of 8 days delay in refilling). GREEN FACADE SOLUTIONS PVT LTD Through: Ms. Manmilan Sidhu, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus ODEON BUILDERS PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Mr. Mohit Kapoor and Mr. Shander Shekher, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of Rs.2,54,73,672/- with interest, pleading (i) that the plaintiff is engaged in the business of aluminium fabrication and is also the supplier and installer of aluminium facades for all types of residential as well as commercial projects; (ii) that the defendant received contract from several sources for construction of certain projects and appointed the plaintiff as its sub contractor with respect to works at (a) Agro Mall, Rohtak; (b) OPD, Rohtak; (c) ITI, Rohtak; (d) CSOI Club, Del...
National Building Construction Corporation vs.suraj Lal Tiwari & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 148/2016 & IA No.6376/2016 (u/O XII R-6 CPC) Date of decision 19th February, 2018. NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION Through: Mr. Sanjeev Mahajan, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus SURAJ LAL TIWARI & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey, Advs. for D-1&2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit (i) for recovery of possession of portion of property No.69, Golf Links, New Delhi; (ii) for recovery of Rs.16,45,000/- towards mesne profits for unauthorised use and occupation from 1st April, 2013 till the institution of the suit; (iii) for recovery of pendente lite and future mesne profits @ Rs.47,000/- per month from 1st March, 2016 till possession; (iv) for mandatory injunction directing the defendant No.3 New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to remove the unauthorised construction raised by the defendants No.1&2 on the property; and, (v) for mandatory injunction directing the d...
Punnu vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~R-83 & 84 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PUNNU CRL.A. 1429/2013 Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, DHCLSC and ..... Appellant Mr. Avinash, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with Insp. Rajendra Meena, Police Training School Dwarka. SAROJ CRL.A. 586/2006 Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with Insp. Rajendra Meena, Police Training School Dwarka. * + + CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1902.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. Crl. A.586/2006 by Appellant Saroj is directed against the judgment dated 17th February, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Crl.A. 1429/2013 & 586/2006 Page 1 of 27 New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No.11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC r...
r.a.s. College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~34 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1358/2018 & CM No.5640/2018 % Date of decision :19. h February, 2018 R.A.S. COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel, NCTE with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 The writ petitioner, an educational institution, was desirous of commencement of the B.Ed. Course in the year 2006 for which prior recognition is required from the National Council of Teachers Education (respondent No.1 hereafter NCTE) which exercises jurisdiction under the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 (hereafter the NCTE Act).2. The manner in which an application for grant of recognition is processed, had been stipulated by the respondent in the ...
M/S Ashoka Chemicals (India) vs.m/s Bhartiya Hindu Shudhi Sabha Trust ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on :-"19th February, 2018 CM(M) 193/2018 & CM Nos.6332-6334/2018 M/S ASHOKA CHEMICALS (INDIA) Through: Mr. Puneet Sharma with ........ Petitioner Mr. Siddharth Dias, Advocates. versus M/S BHARTIYA HINDU SHUDHI SABHA TRUST ( REGD) ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is respondent in the proceedings arising out of petition (E-444/- new No.80179/16) which were instituted by the respondent Trust on 16.09.2015 seeking an order of eviction on the ground of bona fide need under Section 14(1)(e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 respecting a portion forming part of property no.6949, Birla Lines, Sabzi Mandi, New Delhi-110007, which is the subject matter of tenancy in use and occupation of the petitioner herein.2. Having regard to the ground on which eviction is being sought, the procedure under Section 25(B) of Delhi Rent Control Act has been invoked. The petitioner upon being s...