Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kirori Mal College & Ors vs.governing Body of Guru Harkrishan Public S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order : February 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 9487/2017 MANINDER SINGH AHLUWALIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Siddhartha Nanwal, Advocate and Mr.Inder Chand, Advocate versus GOVERNING BODY OF GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL (NEW DELHI) SOCIETY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jasmeet Singh, Advocate and Ms.Aditya Madaan, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 ORDER (ORAL) In this petition, implementation of order of 11th February, 2009 of respondent No.3-Directorate of Education relating to payment of salary etc. in terms of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission is sought.... Petitioner is retired Office Superintendent and his case is that he had made numerous Representations seeking implementation of recommendations of Sixth Central Pay Commission but to no avail. Copy of the Representation has been placed on record as Annexure P-23.2. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appro...
Annat Jain & Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~29 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:20. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 1621/2018 & CM Nos.6654-6655/2018 ANNAT JAIN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr. S.P. Singh Chawla, versus Adv. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Madhuri Dhingra, Adv. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) CM No.6555/2018 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 1621/2018 & CM No.6654/2018 2. A perusal of the writ petition would show that even according to the petitioners, Sanya Automobile Private Limited, which is arrayed as respondent no.5 (hereafter SAPL) in the present writ petition, has been struck off from the Register of Companies and therefore, according to me, the said company cannot be arrayed as party to the present writ petition. 2.1 Respondent no.5 is, thus, deleted from the array of parties.3. I may also note that the petitioners have averred in the writ W.P.(C) 1621/2018 Pa...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.m/s Prasidh Leasing Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:01. 02.2018 Pronounced on:20. 02.2018 ITA6372004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Ruchir Bhatia, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. versus M/S PRASIDH LEASING LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha and Sh. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The following questions of law arise in this appeal:"1. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the advance of a sum of `6.16 crores made by M/s Ginza Industries Ltd. to the assessee cannot be taxed as deemed dividend without returning a finding that the lending of money was the substantial part of the business of the said company (M/s Ginza Industries Ltd); 2. Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that the Assessing Officer had wrongly made disallowance of `43.50 paid by the assessee towards guarantee commission fee; to M/s A...
Rahul Bhargava & Ors vs.state (Nct) of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:16. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:20.02.2018 + W.P.(CRL) 2787/2016 & Crl. M.A. No.14289/2016 RAHUL BHARGAVA & ORS Through... Petitioners in person. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State along with SI Karan Pal. R-2 with her counsel Ms. Priya Hingorani, Mr. Sarvesh Chowdhary, Mr.Himanshu Yadav and Ms. Reema Bhandari, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.For orders, see file of Crl. M.C.2304/2016. FEBRUARY20 2018 A INDERMEET KAUR, J...
Leslie K. David vs.centre for Development of Telematics
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : February 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 1596/2018 & CM No.6547/2018 Through: Mr.Amitesh Gaurav, Advocate ........ Petitioner LESLIE K. DAVID CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR versus CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Brajesh Kumar, Advocate for UOI ORDER (ORAL) 1. Declaration of result of departmental examination conducted by respondent in terms of circular/Advertisement of 29th September, 2016 subject to the outcome of Writ Petition No.21682/2016 pending before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore is sought in this petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner had undertaken the said departmental examination and result of the said departmental examination has not been declared. Attention of this Court is drawn to respondents Communication of 22nd September, 2017 (Annexure P-3 Colly) wherein petitioners request to declare Executive Exam Result has not been acceded while pointing ...
Bache Singh & Ors vs.delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1558/2018 & CM APPL. 6397-6398/2018 BACHE SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma with Mr. Rahul Sharma & Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Advs. Date of Decision:20. 02.2018 versus DELHI HIGH COURT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) The petitioners seek a direction that they be provided promotional avenues by the seniority channel. All of them are Group D employees working as Court Attendants, Ushers, Daftaries, etc. The grievance articulated is that the existing Rules of the High Court Establishment do not enable a seniority channel for promotion but rather restrict the promotional avenue to qualify in a written departmental test with typing test essential condition to the cadre of Restorer/Junior Judicial Assistant, in the 20% quota set apart for promotion in that cadre (the balance 80% has to be filled ...
Rahul Bhargava vs.state (Nct) of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:16. 02.2018 Judgment delivered on:20.02.2018 + CRL.M.C. 2304/2016 & Crl. M.A. Nos.9669/2016 & 15253/2017 RAHUL BHARGAVA Through... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP along with SI Karan Pal. R-2 with her counsel Ms. Priya Hingorani, Mr. Sarvesh Chowdhary, Mr.Himanshu Yadav and Ms. Reema Bhandari, Advs + W.P.(CRL) 2787/2016 & Crl. M.A. No.14289/2016 RAHUL BHARGAVA & ORS Through... Petitioners in person. ........ Petitioners CRL M.C.2304/2016 & W.P. (Crl.) No.2787/2016 Page 1 of 11 versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for the State along with SI Karan Pal. R-2 with her counsel Ms. Priya Hingorani, Mr. Sarvesh Chowdhary, Mr.Himanshu Yadav and Ms. Reema Bhandari, Advs CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1.... Petitioner Rahul Bhargava seeks quashing of the comp...
Shubham Yadav vs.bank of Baroda
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : February 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 6037/2017 & CM No.25065/2017 SHUBHAM YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sumit Kumar, Mr.Abhishek Chakraborty and Mr.Hemant Kumar, Advocates ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Bhupendra Singh Chauhan, Advocate versus BANK OF BARODA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner was working as a cashier with respondent-bank on 12th April, 2017 when he was charge-sheeted and vide Representation of 7th July, 2017 (Annexure P-5), petitioner had sought stay of departmental inquiry till the conclusion of criminal case i.e. RC-DAI-2017(A)0016.... Petitioners Representation (Annexure P-5) stands declined by the Inquiry Officer vide order (Annexure P-6) of even date, while noting that the proceedings in the criminal case are yet to commence. Attention of this Court is drawn to a Communication of 12th July, 2017 (Annexure P-1) filed along with Additional Affidavit of 21st July, 2017 which rev...
A vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI A Decided on:20. h February, 2018 CRL.L.P. 444/2016 Represented by: Mr. R.K. Lamba, Adv. ........ Petitioner STATE & ANR. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kr. Garg, APP with ..... Respondent SI Vikash PS Palam Village. Mr. Vinay Kr. Sharma, Mr. Udham Singh, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 17631/2017 For the reasons stated in the application delay of 78 days in filing the leave to appeal petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CRL.L.P. 444/2016 1. Cause title of the leave to appeal petition has been changed so as to not reveal the identity of the prosecutrix as A Vs. State and Anr. Registry is directed to change the cause title of the leave petition.2. The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 6th November, 2015 acquitting the respondent No.2 for offences punishable under Sections 354/376/377/506 IPC. CRL.L.P. 444/2016 Page 1 of 5 3. FIR No.594/2014 under Se...
Manoj Kumar vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h February, 2018 Decided on:20. h February, 2018 + CRL.A. 1542/2014 MANOJ KUMAR ...Appellant Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Kamil Khan, Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State along with Insp. Meena Yadav, S.I. Yogender, P.S. Aman Vihar. Mr. Lovkesh Swahney, Advocate with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Harikishan Arora, Advocates for the complainant. + CRL.A. 1650/2014 VINOD @ VICKY @ ANR. ..Appellants Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan, Advocate for Appellant Nos.1 and 2 versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State. Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Harikishan Arora, Advocates for the complainant. Crl. A. Nos.1542/2014 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- Next ›
- Last »