Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Neetu Patro vs.iyogi Technical Services Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:19. February 2018 + CCP(CO.) 4/2018 NEETU PATRO ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul, Advocate. versus IYOGI TECHNICAL SERVICES PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nakul Jain, Advocate. CORAM:-"HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an application filed under sections 11 & 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The assertion of the applicant is that the respondent company is in breach of the directions contained in order dated 12.12.2017.2. A perusal of the order dated 12.12.2017 would show that the Court had directed the respondent companys counsel to serve a copy of the scheme on the counsel for the petitioner within three days from that date. Counsel for the petitioner says that the needful has not been done.3. Mr. Nakul Jain, who appears on advance notice has today furnished a copy of the scheme to the counsel for the petitioner. CCP (CO.) 4/2018 Page 1 of 2 Furthermore, cou...
Davender Kumar vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~5 * + W.P.(C) 2916/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DAVENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.A.P.Sahay, CGSC with Ms.J.Priyadarshini, Advocate for UOI. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER1902.2018 The petitioner lays a challenge to the order dated 11.10.2014, % 1. passed by the Appointing Authority i.e. the Commandant, CISF Unit, NLC Neyveli whereby his services have been terminated on account of suppression of facts in the Attestation Form about the registration of a criminal case against him. Challenge has also been laid to the order dated 02.01.2015, whereby the representation filed by the petitioner, assailing the order of the Appointing Authority, has been rejected by the Competent Authority i.e. Inspector General, CISF South Sector HQrs,, ChPT Campus, Chennai.2. In brief, the case of the petitioner is that in the year 2013, after participa...
Ishrat Ali vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~35 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:19. h February, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar Ghawana, Advocate. ISHRAT ALI + W.P.(C) 8138/2016 versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to land of the petitioner comprised in Khasra Nos. 409 admeasuring 250 Sq. Yards in the revenue State of Village Jasola, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Land) is deemed to have been lapsed in view of Section 24 (2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as 2013 Act), as neither the physical possession of the subject land has bee...
Shri Arun Kumar Manocha vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI TEST.CAS. 81/2013 SHRI ARUN KUMAR MANOCHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhishek Paruthi, Advocate Versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rupesh Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.4. Reserved on:07. h February, 2018 Date of Decision:19. h February, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J:1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act for grant of probate in respect of Will dated 21st December, 2009 of the deceased Shri. Kasturi Lal Manocha.2. It has been averred in the petition that the petitioner is the son of the testator Shri Kasturi Lal Manocha, who expired on 12th November, 2012. The deceased is stated to have executed a Will dated 21st December, 2009, which was duly attested by Shri Ashok Kumar Sharma and Shri Yograj Chawla. The Will dated 21st December, 2009 is reproduced hereinunder:-"I KASTURI LAL MANOCHA aged about 84 years, son of Late ...
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd vs.lupin Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~J- * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :08. 02.2018 Pronounced on :19. 02.2018 CS(COMM) 918/2016 SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Hemant Singh, Ms.Mamta Jha and Mr.Waseem Shuaib Ahmed, Advs. versus LUPIN LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.C.M.Lall, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Ankur Sangal & Ms.Pragya Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA Nos.19585/2014 (u/O39R1& 2 CPC) & 20124/2014 (u/O39R4CPC) 1. This suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants, etc. from dealing with any medicinal preparations under the impugned mark TRI-VOBIT or any other mark which is phonetically or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trade mark TRIVOLIB. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. Along with the suit, the plaintiff filed IA No.19585/2014 under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC. This application along with the suit came up for hearing on 01.10.2014 when this court passed an interi...
Canara Bank & Anr. Vs.oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.922/2004 16th February, 2018 + % METRO EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Jayakar, Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Shete, Advocate, Mr. Javaid Muzaffar, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Advocate and Mr. Bharat Bagla, Advocate. Through: Mr. Mohan M. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Defendant versus Through: Ms. Sunita Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit being CS(OS) No.922/2004 is filed by the plaintiff Metro Exporters Pvt. Ltd. The sole defendant in the suit is United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By the suit plaintiff seeks a money decree for a total amount of Rs.79,38,613.02/-, i.e principal amount of Rs.76,70,056/- with interest at 18%. The present suit was originally filed in the Mumbai High Court but was thereafter transferred to this Court in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23.1.2004 in CS(OS) No.922/2004 a...
Radhakanta Tripathy vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C) 8785/2016 Date of Decision:19. h February, 2018 RADHAKANTA TRIPATHY Through: ........ Petitioner... Petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advs. for R-1 & 2. Ms. Astha Khatwani, Joint Secretary, MOWCD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition was filed on the 23rd of September, 2016 making a grievance that the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (hereinafter referred to as NCPCR) has to be statutorily constituted under the provisions of Section 8 of the Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005. However, the petitioner submits, that the NCPCR is unable to transact any business at all because of vacancies of its members. W.P.(C) No.8785/2016 Pg. 1 of 9 2. The petitioner has placed Sec...
Sos Pharma vs.sas Pharmaceuticals
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h February, 2018 + RFA6952014 SOS PHARMA Through: Mr. Kawal Jyot Singh & Mr. Yogesh Gupta, Advocates (M-9888884444, 9872179223). ..... Appellant versus SAS PHARMACEUTICALS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A. K. Goel, Advocate (M- 9910658078). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. This is an appeal against the final decree and judgment dated 11th December, 2014 by which a permanent injunction has been granted against the appellant in the following terms :-"Vide separate plaintiffs suit is decreed as follows: judgment announced today, the by the and/or restraining (i) the plaintiff's suit for perpetual injunction is decreed in favour of plaintiff and against the defendant defendant/its proprietor, its servants, dealers, representatives and agents/marketing of pharmaceutical or medicinal products or any other goods under the mark REGULATOR or any other mark the Plaintiffs registered trade mark REGULI...
Prasar Bharati vs.comcon Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP (COMM) 21/2015 Reserved on:12. h January, 2018 Date of decision:19. h February, 2018 PRASAR BHARATI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajeev Sharma, Ms.Radha Lakshmi, Advs. versus COMCON INDUSTRIES ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Anindita Deka, Ms.S.Spandana Reddy, Ms.Vidushi Garg, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the arbitral award dated 24.08.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator in case No.12(3)10-D(P)(P-S) Cell/AT-348 dated 25/07/2013.2. The disputes between the parties relate to the non supply of General Purpose Receivers (144 Nos.) by the respondent to the petitioner.3. The petitioner vide its Acceptance of Tender dated 25.07.2013 had placed an order of supply of the following items on the respondent: Procurement of Professional DRM Monitor Receiver and DRM General Recei...
Devender @ Pappu & Anr vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~ * + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 12/2013 Reserved on: January 16, 2018 Decided on: February 19, 2018 NAVAL KISHORE @ NAVAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raj Pal Singh, Advocate. STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru and Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APPs Inspector Sunil Kumar, PS Anand Parbat. AND CRL. A. 184/2013 & CRL.MA. 6795/2017 DEVENDER @ PAPPU & ANR Through: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate. ..... Appellants STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru and Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APPs Inspector Sunil Kumar, PS Anand Parbat. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These appeals are against the impugned judgment dated 9th October 2012 Crl.A. 12/2013 & Crl.A. 184/2013 Page 1 of 28 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-01, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.11/2011 arising out of FIR No.03/2011 registered at PS Anand Parbat convicting the Appellants for the offence under Section 3...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »