Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Airports Authority of India vs.m/s Parnika Commercial & Estate (P) Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP1172015 Reserved on:1. t February, 2018 Date of decision:19. h February, 2018 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA Through: Mr.Sunil Ahuja, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner M/S PARNIKA COMMERCIAL & ESTATE (P) LTD. & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA Through: Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner Airports Authority of India challenging the Arbitral Award dated 05.09.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator. The challenge to the Award is confined to grant of claim No.1,4,7.1 and the Additional Claim No.2 as also the interest on the awarded amounts.2. Claim No.1 raised by the respondent before the Sole Arbitrator was for a sum of Rs. 4,58,000/- towards the recovery of liquidated damages imposed by the petitioner.3. The respondent had been granted the work of extension of Rajiv Gandhi Bhavan, (...
Shri Girish Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : February 19, 2018 W.P.(C) 1504/2018 & CM Nos.6151-52/2018 SHRI GIRISH KUMAR Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC and Mr.Abhishek Ghai, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT1 Order of 24th January, 2018 (Annexure P-1 Colly) declines to confirm petitioner as Director (Bengaluru Complex), Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and the denial of confirmation has been communicated to petitioner vide order of 13th February, 2018 which is under challenge in this petition.2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed as Director (Bengaluru Complex), Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) on 26th February, 2016 and he had assumed charge on 1st May, 2016. Letter of 26th September, 2016 (Annexure P-11) spells out the terms and conditions of petitioners appointment as a Director with effect from 1st...
Saroj vs.the State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~R-83 & 84 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI PUNNU CRL.A. 1429/2013 Through: Mr. Aditya Vikram, DHCLSC and ..... Appellant Mr. Avinash, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with Insp. Rajendra Meena, Police Training School Dwarka. SAROJ CRL.A. 586/2006 Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE OF NCT DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State with Insp. Rajendra Meena, Police Training School Dwarka. * + + CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA ORDER1902.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: Introduction 1. Crl. A.586/2006 by Appellant Saroj is directed against the judgment dated 17th February, 2006 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ), Crl.A. 1429/2013 & 586/2006 Page 1 of 27 New Delhi in Sessions Case No.163/2004 arising out of FIR No.11/2003 registered at Police Station (PS) Delhi Cantonment, convicting her for the offence under Section 109 IPC r...
Universal Human Rights Commission vs.commissioner-mcd and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~31 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10051/2017 % Date of decision :19. h February, 2018 UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER-MCD AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Kapil Dutta for Mr. Ajjay Aroraa, Adv. for R- MCD Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Adv. for R-GNCTD SI Shri Bhagwan from PS Neb Sarai CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition pertains to an order of demolition dated 15th January, 2016 passed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation in respect of the property admeasuring approximately 300 yds. adjoining the Yadav Complex, School Road, Khanpur Village, Khanpur, New Delhi within the jurisdiction of PS Neb Sarai, New Delhi in respect of unauthorized construction allegedly raised by respondent no.7/Sh.Ram Singh/Billu Choudhary. W.P.(C)No.10051/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. This demolition order was ...
Tata Communications Limited vs.union of India Thr. The Land Acquisitio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~4 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"19th February, 2018 CM(M) 895/2015 and CM APPL.21036/2015, 21039/2015 TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aditya Nayyar & Mr. Varun Byreddy, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA THR. THE LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. B.L. Wali, Advocate with Ms. Deepti Gupta, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Yeeshu Jain Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petition at hand was filed to assail the order dated 20.05.2015 of the Additional District Judge (ADJ) passed on the file of land acquisition case (LAC) No.14/2014 to the extent thereby two issues (issue Nos.7 and8) were framed having a bearing on the question of title of the petitioner in the land which is subject-matter of the acquisition proceedings leading to the award dated 30.12.2013 being passed by the first respondent and the reference dated 15....
Madan Lal Wadhwa vs.gurpreet Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~6 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"19th February, 2018 CM(M) 845/2016 and CM APPL.31545/2016 MADAN LAL WADHWA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Wadhwa, attorney of the petitioner along with... Petitioner in person. versus GURPREET KAUR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Chand Zafar, Advocate with Ms. Mahima Dayani, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the defendant in the civil suit (CS No.35/2015) pending on the file of the Civil Judge, South-East District at Saket Court Complex, New Delhi. The suit of the respondent (the plaintiff of the suit) seeks relief against the petitioner (the defendant) in respect of common lavatory block attached to the locality known as Double Storey Quarters, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi-110014, he (the plaintiff) claiming to be the owner/allottee of quarter/tenement No.3/47, the defendant claiming to be the owner/allottee of the quarter/tenement No.3/45. The plaint was filed to seek per...
Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 363/2018 & Crl.M.A. 2151/2018 Reserved on: February 13, 2018 Decided on: February 19, 2018 RAJBHUSHAN OMPRAKASH DIXIT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikram Chaudhary Senior Advocate with Mr. Sameer Rohatgi, Mr.Harshit Sethi, Mr.Wattan Sharma, Mr.Ashish Batra and Mr.Sankalp Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Mr.Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.Gaurav Rohilla, GP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: $~ * + JUDGMENT1 The... Petitioner, Rajbhushan Omprakash Dixit, has filed the present writ petition on 1st February 2018 seeking issuance for a writ of habeas corpus for releasing the... Petitioner from custody. He has sought a declaration that issuance of a non-bailable warrant (NBW) dated 24th January 2018, his arrest pursuant thereto on 25th January 2018 in ECIR/HQ/17/2017 and the consequent remand orders passed by the learned Additional Sessions ...
Gyanender Singh vs.subhash Chand & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :11. h January 2018 Date of decision :19th February, 2018 + RFA952017 GYANENDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L. B. Rai, Advocate. versus SUBHASH CHAND & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Lakshmi Narain and Mr. Honey Taneja, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeal arises out of judgement and order dated 27th September, 2016 by which the suit for specific performance and permanent injunction filed by the Appellant/Plaintiff (hereinafter Plaintiff) was dismissed as being barred by limitation.2. Late Shri Banwari Lal was the co-owner of land comprising in Khasra No.33/(1-16) in the Revenue Estate of Village Palam, New Delhi. Late Shri Banwari Lal had four sons namely Subhash Chand, Satbir Singh, Rajesh Kumar and Ganga Ram. Plaintiff is the son of Ganga Ram, who is now deceased and is thus represented by his heirs. The... RESPONDENTS/Defendants (hereinafter Defendants) a...
Sunita Devi and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4251/2016 SUNITA DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Date of Judgment :19th February, 2018 Through Mr. Gaurav Puri, Mr. Dhan Singh, Mr. Vijya Pratap Singh & Ms. Shweta Pandey, Advocates. versus CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through Ms. Mini Pushkarna with Ms. Anushruti, Advocates for L&B/LAC. Mr. Akshay Makhija with Mr. Aditya Goyal & Ms. Mahima Bahl, Advs. for applicants in CM APPL64772018 & 6478/2018. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL64782018 (Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 4251/2016 3. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceeding pertaining to the land of the petitioners admeasuring 1 bigha 15 biswas comprised in Khasra no.272 min., situated in the revenue estate of W.P...
Canara Bank & Anr. Vs.oriental Fire & General Ins. Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.922/2004 16th February, 2018 + % METRO EXPORTERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Jayakar, Advocate with Mr. Ashwin Shete, Advocate, Mr. Javaid Muzaffar, Advocate, Mr. Harsh Moorjani, Advocate and Mr. Bharat Bagla, Advocate. Through: Mr. Mohan M. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Defendant versus Through: Ms. Sunita Dutta, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit being CS(OS) No.922/2004 is filed by the plaintiff Metro Exporters Pvt. Ltd. The sole defendant in the suit is United India Insurance Co. Ltd. By the suit plaintiff seeks a money decree for a total amount of Rs.79,38,613.02/-, i.e principal amount of Rs.76,70,056/- with interest at 18%. The present suit was originally filed in the Mumbai High Court but was thereafter transferred to this Court in terms of the order of the Supreme Court dated 23.1.2004 in CS(OS) No.922/2004 a...