Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amit Kotnala vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2018 $~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + AMIT KOTNALA THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) BAIL APPLN. 2350/2017 versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sunil Dutt Dixit and Mr. Vijay Jakhwal, Advocates. Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State. SI Kiran, PS South Rohini : : % ORDER2002.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks Bail in case FIR No.237/2017 under Sections 376/323/5IPC, Police Station South-Rohini.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner on the pretext of marriage developed relationship with the complainant. It is contended that there is also a child born from the relationship between the petitioner and the complainant. The petitioner is stated to have brought the complainant to his parental house to live with him in Delhi and they resided together for nearly six years. Learned counsel for ...
Umesh Dutt Sharma vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1617/2018 & C.M. No.6645/2018 (delay) UMESH DUTT SHARMA Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar, Mr. Rohit Pandey, Mr. Sarthak Chaturvedi and Mr. Nishant Kumar and Mr. Prabhu Singh, Advocates. ........ Petitioner versus Through: Ms. Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % ORDER2002.2018 1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment dated 06.03.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No.3878/2012 filed by him for seeking quashment of a promotion of order dated 23.03.2012, passed in respect of JE Grade-II under LDCE quota and further, consider him for promotion to the subject post with all consequential benefits.2. By the impugned order, the Tribunal dismissed the O.A. filed by the petitioner by making the following observations:-"We have heard the learned counsel for the Applicant Shri M.K. Bhardwaj and the learned counse...
r.s. Verma vs.sports Authority of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~22 * + W.P.(C) 1581/2018 & CM No.6533/2018 R.S. VERMA Through: Mr.Avijit Singh & Ms.Heena Sharma, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS SPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS. CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI Through: Mr.Keshav Mohan & Mr.Rishi K.Awasthi, Advs.for R-1 & R-2 Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI/R-3 with Mr.Kavindra Gill, Mr.Rajeev Ranjan Shahi & Mr.Harsh Pandit, Advocates ORDER2002.2018 The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 31.10.2017, % 1. passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, rejecting O.A. No.2427/2016, filed by him on two counts, firstly, that the issue raised in the said O.A. is identical to the issue raised by the petitioner in an earlier O.A. filed by him in the year 2014 i.e. O.A. 1307/2014 and therefore, the same is hit by the principles of res judicata; secondly, on the ground that the petition is barred by limitation. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the...
Union of India vs.man Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * % + W.P. (C) 947/2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:20. 07.2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2018 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate Versus MAN SINGH... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Pramod Gupta and Ms. Kreeti Joshi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred the petition to assail the order dated 25.03.2014 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in OA No.3366/2012. The Tribunal vide its order dated 25.03.2014 allowed the O.A. preferred by the respondent and set aside the disciplinary proceedings against the respondent, as well as the order W.P. (C) 947/2015 Page 1 of 11 dated 16.08.2012 of the Disciplinary Authority imposing penalty upon the respondent.2. Before the Tribunal, the Respondent had challenged the departmental inquiry proceedings undertaken against him, which culminated i...
Mohd. Kafil vs.sumbul
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2018 $~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MOHD. KAFIL CRL.REV.P.611/2017 ........ Petitioner versus SUMBUL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr Manu Sishodia, Mr Mahendra Bairwa and Mr Abhishek Bansiwal. For the Respondent : None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2002.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 13386/2017(exemption) CRL.REV.P. Crl.M.A.13384/2017(delay in filing for 313 days) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 611/2017 & CM No.13385/2017(stay) & 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 13.07.2016, whereby the Trial Court has fixed ad interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.4500/- CRL.REV.P.611/2017 Page 1 of 3 effective from the date of the application (i.e. 26.10.2015) and further impugns order dated 06.07.2017, whereby costs of Rs.5,000/- have been imposed on the petitioner for not complying with order dated 13.07.2016.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits t...
Dr. s.p. Gupta vs.kirori Mal College & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 1615/2018 & CM Nos.6633-34/2018 DR. S.P. GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.Rajesh Gupta, Advocate with... Petitioner versus in person KIRORI MAL COLLEGE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocate for R-1 and R-2 Mr.Amit Bansal and Ms.Seema Dolo, Advocates for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Impugned order of 30th November, 2017 terminates petitioners service with effect from 8th April, 2017.2. To assail the impugned order, learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is an Ex-Principal of respondent-college who has rendered 42 years of service and on the last date of the superannuation, his service has been terminated without there being approval of the impugned order by the Executive Council of respondent-College. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that denial of retiral benefits is wholly unjustified and compensation/damages to the ...
Aakriti Tiwari vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2018 + W.P.(C) 7470/2017 AAKRITI TIWARI ..... PETITIONER Through Mr.Banamali Shukla, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. with Mr.Nitish Negi, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Ms.Anita Sahani, Adv. for R-3. Mr.Kundan Kumar Mishra, Adv. with Mr.Ajay Kumar Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent nos.2 to 4, to grant her another chance to appear in the Anatomy Examination and has further prayed that she may be allotted the same batch of 2014, which was her original batch, for undergoing the course of BHMS in the respondent no.2/College.2. The case as set up by the petitioner is that the petitioner had taken admission in Bachelor of Homoeopathy Medicine & Surgery (BHMS) at respondent no.2/College, which is affiliated with respondent no.3/University, in ...
Vinod @ Vicky @ Anr. Vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h February, 2018 Decided on:20. h February, 2018 + CRL.A. 1542/2014 MANOJ KUMAR ...Appellant Through: Mr. Sacchin Puri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Kamil Khan, Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State along with Insp. Meena Yadav, S.I. Yogender, P.S. Aman Vihar. Mr. Lovkesh Swahney, Advocate with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey, Mr. Harikishan Arora, Advocates for the complainant. + CRL.A. 1650/2014 VINOD @ VICKY @ ANR. ..Appellants Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Mr. Vishesh Chauhan, Advocate for Appellant Nos.1 and 2 versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)... RESPONDENTThrough: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State. Mr. Lovkesh Sawhney with Mr. Durgesh Kumar Pandey and Mr. Harikishan Arora, Advocates for the complainant. Crl. A. Nos.1542/2014 ...
Royal Babu @ Milan vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN.2460/2017 Judgment delivered on:20. 02.2018 ROYAL BABU @ MILAN ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Vinay Kumar Sharma and Mr Udham Singh Mr. Akshai Malik, APP for the State. W/SI Saroj Bala, PS Dwarka. : : % ORDER2002.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks bail in case FIR No.139/2017 under Sections 376 IPC & Section 8 POCSO Act, Police Station Dwarka. The petitioner has been in custody since 12.09.2017.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner, on the false pretext of marriage, made physical relationships with the complainant. The complainant, in the FIR, contended that she was less than 17 years of age, when the alleged physical relationship was made. BAIL APPLN. 2460/2017 Page 1 of 2 3. The statement of the prosecutrix has been rec...
Swarn Singh vs.surinder Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :-"20th February, 2018 C.R.P. 31/2018 + SWARN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manav Gupta with Ms. Esha Dutta & Mr. Sahil Garg, Advocates. versus SURINDER KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, Ms. Aastik Dhingra, Ms. Manisha Mehta, Ms. Vaishal Tanwar & Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) Caveat No.137/2018 Since the counsel for the caveator has appeared, the caveat stands discharged. CM No.6375/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRP No.31/2018 Page 1 of 6 C.R.P. 31/2018 & CM No.6374/2018 1. The petitioner is the plaintiff of civil suit presently registered as CS No.71pending on the file of Additional District Judge-05, South District, Saket. The suit, as instituted, was for a decree of specific performance on the basis of receipt-cum-agreement dated 16.06.1993 followed by two other agreements da...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »