Delhi Court February 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gurdev Singh & Ors vs.guru Teg Bahadur Institute of Technology & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~9 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 02.2018 LPA1222017 & C.M. No.6570/2017 GURDEV SINGH & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. V. Elanchezhiyan, Advocate along with Mr. Jawaid H. Khan and Mr. Nasim Anwar, Advocates. versus GURU TEG BAHADUR INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY & ORS Through: Mr. Abinash Kr. Mishra, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS for respondent No.1. Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate along with Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocate for DSGMC. Ms. Anita Sahani, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) In view of the decision rendered by us today in LPA No.95/2017, titled as Baidyanath Yadav & Ors. vs. Guru Tegh Bahadur Polytechnic Institute & Anr, wherein it is held that under Section 32 of the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1971, any and all types of disputes between the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) and its employees are exclusively subject to the jurisdiction of the C...
Gaurav Gupta vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~28,32,33,34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:21. 2.2018 28 + W.P.(C) 1661/2018 & CM APPL. 6831-6833/2018 32 ARTI VERMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. + W.P.(C) 1666/2018 & CM APPL. 6843-6845/2018 GAURAV GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. W.P. (C) 1661,1666,1667,1668/2018 Page 1 of 4 33 + W.P.(C) 1667/2018 & CM APPL. 6846-6848/2018 RITESH KUMAR VERMA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Naman Jain, Joshi, Mr. Hemant Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R1 and R2. 34 + W.P.(C) 1668/2018 & CM APPL. 6849-6851/2018 DINKAR MUKUL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr...
Ashok Kriplani vs.madan Lal Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. t February, 2018 C.R.P. 17/2015 and CM106522016 (O.22 R.4 CPC) ASHOK KRIPLANI Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vipul Jai, Advocate. MADAN LAL SHARMA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) The petitioner had instituted civil suit (suit no.682/2014) on 1. 03.06.2014 impleading the respondent as second defendant, his brother-in-law Dr. Jethanand Jethwani, being the first defendant. The suit prayed for damages against the said defendants on account of vengeance, mis-representation, concealment of facts, mental agony, defamation, abuse of power and possession, mindless collusion and dragging of case. On questions about maintainability of the suit against the respondent (second defendant) being raised as per proceedings recorded by the trial judge on 29.10.2014, the matter was heard. By order dated 28.11.2014, the Additional District Judge in seisin of the matter...
Baidyanath Yadav & Ors vs.guru Tegh Bahadur Polytechnic Institute & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-21-2018
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:21. 02.2018 LPA952017, C.M. No.4694/2017 & C.M. No.10740/2017 BAIDYANATH YADAV & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Lawin, Advocate. versus GURU TEGH BAHADUR POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate along with Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocate for DSGMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent Act assails the judgment dated 27.01.2017, passed in W.P (C) No.745/2017 titled as Baidyanath Yadav & Ors vs. Guru Tegh Bahadur Polytechnic Institute & Anr. (hereinafter referred to as the subject petition), whereby, a learned Single Judge of this Court having found that the subject disputes raised therein would be governed by sub-section (d) of Section 32 of the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as LPA952017 Page 1 the said act), and after ...
Ajit Kumar vs.the Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 02.2018 + LPA682018 & CM APPL. 6630-6632/2018 AJIT KUMAR Through: Mr. Devendra Kumar Singh with Mr. Jagannath Singh, Advs. ..... Appellant versus THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC with Mr. Ruchir Ranjan Rai & Mr. Siddharth Singh, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Mr. T. Singhdev with Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Mr. Tarun Verma, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Biakthansangi Das & Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advs. for R-2/MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. This appeal is directed against an order of the learned Single Judge rejecting a writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petitioner (i.e. the present appellant) sought a direction for quashing of a decision of the Medical Council of India (MCI) and the quashing of a First Information Report (FIR).2. The facts, briefly, are that the petitioner cla...
Ht Media Limited vs.deputy Labour Commissioner & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:20. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 11109/2015 & CM No.28778/2015 HT MEDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajshekhar Rao, Advocate with Mr.Nakul Sachdeva and Mr.Ankit Rajgarhia, Advocates. versus DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER & ANR...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for R-1 with Ms.Urvi Mohan, Advocate. Mr.Umesh Sharma, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, which is a newspaper establishment, seeks quashing of the summon bearing No.18/WJA/DLC/NDD/2015/3452 dated 16.11.2015 issued to them by the Deputy Labour Commissioner/respondent no.1.2. The respondent no.2 had approached the respondent no.1 to give him benefit of Majithia Wage Board Award W.P (C) 11109/2015 Page 1 of 4 recommendations which were accepted by the Central Government on 11.11.2011.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner...
Dr. Vijyant Agarwal vs.netaji Subhas Institute of Technology (Nsic)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order : February 20, 2018 W.P.(C) 1614/2018 DR. VIJYANT AGARWAL Through: Mr.Arun Dhiman, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus * % + Through: Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate ..... Respondent NETAJI SUBHAS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (NSIC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner claims to be an Assistant Professor with Respondent- Institute and is said to have sought promotion as Professor under the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) with effect from 31st August, 2015 and it is the case of petitioner that although petitioner had applied under the said scheme on 22nd November, 2017 but no response has been received. According to petitioner, selection committee meeting under this scheme was last held on 28th March, 2016. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that no response to petitioners Representation of 5th February, 2018 (Annexure-A Colly) has been received till date. Learned counsel for respondent submits that if it is...
Airports Authority of India vs.m/s Sikka Associates
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 24/2018 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Date of Judgment :20th February, 2018 Through Mr. K.K. Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. versus Digvijay Rai, Ms. Chetna Rai, Mr. Anshul Rai, Mr. Chandershekhar A.C., Mr. Pulkit Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: M/S SIKKA ASSOCIATES ..... Respondent Through Mr. Virender Kumar Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 against the judgment dated 21.12.2017 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which the award dated 23.03.2015 passed by the sole arbitrator has been upheld and the objections to the award stand dismissed.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this appeal are that the Board of the appellant in its 96th Board Meeting held on 16.03.2006 granted approval...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-21 vs.dr. Vandana Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % 1. Reserved on:29. 01.2018 Pronounced on:20. 02.2018 ITA2192017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-21 Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue. ..... Appellant versus DR. VANDANA GUPTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT The question of law framed for this appeal is as follows: Did the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fall into error in holding that the penalty of `67,98,000/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not leviable in the facts and circumstances of the case?. 2. The brief facts are that the assessee an individual, filed her return of income on 25.09.2009 in which she declared a total income of `9,18,060/-. During the pendency of proceedings for that assessment year, survey was conducted under Section 133A by the Revenue at her business premises (B-1, Rohit Kunj, Pitam...
d.b. Corp. Ltd. Vs.government of n.c.t. Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-20-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:20. 02.2018 W.P. (C) 1592/2018 D B CORP. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr.B.K. Mishra and Ms.Prashanti Pasupuleti, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. DELHI AND ORS....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Kishor Ram Lambat, Advocate (Enrol. No.MAH9281988). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) CM No.6545/2018 (exemption) Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) 1592/2018 & CM No.6544/2018 (for stay) 1. Mr.Kishor Ram Lambat, Advocate, undertakes to file vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 during the course of the day.2. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order bearing No.08/WJA/DLC/NDD/2017/3320-3323 dated 24.11.2017 passed by Sh. U.K. Sinha, Authority under Working Journalists W.P (C) 1592/2018 Page 1 of 4 & Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 (hereinafter re...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »