Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 28 of about 598 results (0.018 seconds)Gaurang Kanth vs.bses Rajdhani Power Limited
Court: Delhi
Date of Decision:12. 12.2017 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA3162017 & CM No.16147/2017 GAURANG KANTH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Mr. Rajeev Kr. Yadav, Mr. Sidharth Chopra & Mr. Pranvir Sethi, Advs. versus BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED ..... Respondent Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing Through: Counsel for BSES RPL with Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi, Ms. Anju Thomas & Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advs. for R-1. Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant is aggrieved by the order of the Single Judge rejecting his petition remanding the disputes urged by him with respect to the order made by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (hereafter referred to as CGRF) set up under Section 42(5) of the Electricity Act, 2003.2. Briefly, the dispute relates to electricity connection provided by the BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (hereafter LPA No.316/2017...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Nakshathra Construction, Thr. Its Proprietor vs.m/s Intergen Energ ...
Court: Delhi
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB. P. 592/2017 Date of decision:12. h December, 2017 M/S NAKSHATHRA CONSTRUCTION, THR. ITS PROPRIETOR Through Ms.Tatini Basu, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S INTERGEN ENERGY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr.Prashant Mehta, ms.Neha Tanwar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner M/s Nakshathra Construction seeking appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondent namely M/s Intergen Energy Ltd.2. It is the case of the petitioner that one M/s Bollareddy Satyanarayan Reddy (hereinafter referred to as Bollareddy) had been awarded work for construction of Guard Pond for respondents 1.5 MLD CETP Project at Atchutapuram SEZ, Vizag. The Work Order dated 15th September, 2015 had been ARB.P. 5...
Tag this Judgment!M/S United India Insurance Company Limited vs.gul Mohd. @ Gullu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-701 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC. APP. 1301/2012 Decided on:12. h December, 2017 M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. Shoumik Mazumdar, Advocate ..... Appellant versus GUL MOHD. @ GULLU & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for R-3/DTC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case (Suit No.152/11), was instituted on 08.07.2011, by the first respondent (claimant), seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 26.03.2011, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as bus, bearing registration No.DL-1PB-6654, of Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), admittedly insured against third party risk for the period in question with the appellant (insurer). By judgment dated 27.08.2012, the tribunal accepted the said claim, returned a finding that the claimant had been rendered permanently disabled, his functional disability havin...
Tag this Judgment!Govind Yadav vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~7 to 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2140/2015 GOVIND YADAV ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhijat, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr. Rajan Sabharwal and Mr. Pravesh Joshi, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6794/2016 SATVEER KUMAR MEENA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhijat, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Rajan Sabharwal and Mr. Pravesh Joshi, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS W.P.(C)2140/2015 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 + W.P.(C) 7392/2016 NAVEEN KUMAR SAIN AND ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhijat, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma, Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates. versus + W.P.(C) 8233/2016 & C.M. No.34125/2016 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS JAIMAL DHANKAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhijat, Advocate with Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma, Mr....
Tag this Judgment!Christian Louboutin Sas vs.mr Pawan Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h September, 2017 Decided on:12. h December, 2017 CS(COMM) 714/2016 CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv MR PAWAN KUMAR & ORS versus Anand, Ms. Udita Patro and Mr. Shamim Nooreyezdan, Advocates. ..... Defendants Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 In the suit plaintiff prays for the following reliefs: a) An order for permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their partners, if any, officers, servants and agents, distributors, stockists and representatives from manufacturing, selling and/or offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in (either through their physical shop/s or online, including through social media or any e-commerce platforms, or any manner whatsoever), footwear including ladies shoes or any other goods bearing the Plaintiffs registered trademark No.1922048, for the RED SOLE trademark i.e. or any similar tradema...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.khem Chand
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 12, 2017 MAC.APP. 1021/2015 & CM326082015 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates Versus KHEM CHAND Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 1st October, 2015 grants compensation of `66,608/- with interest @ 12% per annum. Respondent-claimant had suffered grievous injuries in a vehicular accident on 22nd December, 2012. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) vide impugned Award has granted compensation to respondent-claimant, whose break-up is as under: - Loss of pain and sufferings Special diet and conveyance Expenses towards medicines (with bills) Attendant charges for one month `3,500/- loss of `14,508/- Compensation towards Amount `20,000/- `20,000/- `8,600/- S.No.Name of...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs.kamlesh Pal and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-696 & 697 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12902012 and CM210862012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus KAMLESH PAL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for + MAC APPEAL3912013 R-1 to R-3. KAMLESH PAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus AJAY AGGARWAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Gaj Ram, then over 51 years of age, employed as baildar with New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC), suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 10.07.2011 due to negligent MAC Appeal No.1290/2012 & 391/2013 Page 1 of 4 driving of motor vehicle described as Wagon-R car, bearing registration No.DL-9CP-1737 and died in the consequence. Accident claim case (MACT No.11/11) was instituted on 22.10.2011 by his wife and two other...
Tag this Judgment!The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.ram Saran & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-703 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL13032012 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ...Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate versus RAM SARAN & ORS. Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In the course of inquiry into the accident claim case (MACT no.124/06), instituted by the first respondent (claimant) on 03.06.2006, seeking compensation for the injuries suffered by him in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 06.11.2002, due to the negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as Tata Tempo bearing registration no.DL-1LE-0760, the appellant admittedly being the insurer of the said vehicle, had taken the defence that there was a breach of the terms and conditions of the insurance policy, as second respondent (driver of the offending vehicle) was not holding a valid or effective driving licence. The tribunal framed issues on 04.08.2007, the second of the issues thus...
Tag this Judgment!Arun Jaitley vs.arvind Kejriwal
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 236/2017 ARUN JAITLEY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manik Dogra and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates. versus ARVIND KEJRIWAL ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Anoop George Chaudhari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Ms. Sumeeta Chaudhari and Mr. Irsad, Advocates. Reserved on :07. h November, 2017 Date of Decision:12. h December, 2017 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 13011/2017 1. Present application has been filed under Order 6 Rule 16 read with Section 151 CPC for striking off the preliminary submissions in the replication filed by the plaintiff. The preliminary submissions of replication sought to be expunged by the defendant by way of the present application are as under:-""6It was only after the notice was issued by this Honble Court on 23.07.2017 and summons were served on the Defendant on 06.06.2017, that the Defendant, in order to CS(OS) 236/2017 Page 1 of 1...
Tag this Judgment!Baljeet Singh & Ors vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~24 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2017 + W.P.(C) 5162/2016 BALJEET SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. B.S. Maan and Mr. Shitiz Agnihotri, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Adv. for L&B/LAC. Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain and Ms. Vineeta Bansal, Advs. for R3/DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Counter-affidavit has been handed over in Court by the counsel for the respondent / LAC. Let the same be taken on record. Copy supplied to the counsel for the petitioners.2. With the consent of the parties, present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to the land of the petitioners comprised in Khasra W.P.(C) No....
Tag this Judgment!