Delhi Court December 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 29 of about 598 results (0.019 seconds)Gurdeep Singh vs.lt. Governor, Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~73 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:12. h December, 2017 + W.P. (C.) No.3744/2015 GURDEEP SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Gayatri Nandwani, Advocates versus LT. GOVERNOR, NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for L&B/LAC. Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms.Gauri Chaturvedi, Advocate for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner.3. The necessary facts to be noticed for disposal of this writ petition are that a Section 4 read with Section 17 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894(hereinafter referred to as the Act) was issued on 27.10.1999. Thereafter, on 03.04.2000 a Section 6 notification wa...
Tag this Judgment!Narenderjeet Kaur vs.kamal Anwar & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-698 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAC. APP. 1292/2012 Decided on:12. h December, 2017 NARENDERJEET KAUR Through: Nemo. ..... Appellant versus KAMAL ANWAR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Advocate for Mr. J.P.N. Shahi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant had instituted accident claim case (Suit No.222/10) on 06.09.2007, seeking compensation under Sections 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for the injuries suffered by her in the motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 31.07.2007, due to negligent driving of motor vehicle described as Ambassador car, bearing registration No.DL-2C-M-3212, proved to have been insured against third party risk for the period in question with the third respondent (insurer). On the basis of evidence led, the tribunal, by judgment dated 26.06.2012, upheld the said claim and awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.2,69,768/-, fastening the liability to pay on the ins...
Tag this Judgment!Neha Walia vs.the National Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-704-705 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL13042012 and CM214322012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates Versus NEHA WALIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Trivedi, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Advocate for R-2 & 3 Nandwani, Sameer + MAC APPEAL202013 NEHA WALIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Trivedi, Advocates Versus THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Advocate for R-2 & 3 Nandwani, Sameer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Neha Walia (claimant), then aged 22 years, pursuing a course of study leading to graduation, statedly having worked as an associate MAC Appeal No.1304/2012 & 20/2013 Page 1 of 6 with a private entity (Wipro Spectramind) and as a Sales Consult...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Cwhec-Hcil (Jv) vs.m/s Chprcl
Court: Delhi
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 08, 2017 Judgment delivered on: December 12, 2017 FAO(OS) (COMM) 83/2017 M/S CWHEC-HCIL (JV) Through: Mr. Sanath Kumar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Arvind Minocha, Adv. ..... Appellant versus M/S CHPRCL Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The challenge in this Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 read with Section 13 of the Commercial Court Act, is to the judgment dated February 20, 2017 of the learned Single Judge in OMP (COMM) 559/2016 passed in a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short A and C Act) whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the petition and set aside the Arbitral Award dated April 27, 2007.2. By way of the Award dated April 27, 2007, the Arbitral Tribunal has accepted the claim of the appellant herein with regard...
Tag this Judgment!In the Matter of Raj Kumar vs.punjab and Sind Bank and Ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.(C) 11034/2017 & C.M. 45112/2017 Date of Decision: December 12, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF RAJ KUMAR Through: Mr. G.S. Chaturvedi, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagat Arora & Mr. Niras Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT ORAL1 Consequent upon departmental proceedings initiated against petitioner, who was the Branch Manager of Punjab and Sind Bank, Roshan Pur branch, penalty of dismissal which shall ordinarily be a disqualification for future employment was imposed on the charge of conniving with S. Gurjant Singh, Desk Officer and Sukhdev Singh, the concerned Clerk in debiting the excess amount to Banks Head-Interest paid to saving bank deposits and credited the excess debited amount to some irrelevant accounts on certain dates to the tune of `1,85,150/- for his personal gains and had taken away / stolen the relevant banks record.2. The appeal and ...
Tag this Judgment!Kamlesh Pal & Ors. Vs.ajay Aggarwal & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-696 & 697 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL12902012 and CM210862012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus KAMLESH PAL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate for + MAC APPEAL3912013 R-1 to R-3. KAMLESH PAL & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate versus AJAY AGGARWAL & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Gaj Ram, then over 51 years of age, employed as baildar with New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC), suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 10.07.2011 due to negligent MAC Appeal No.1290/2012 & 391/2013 Page 1 of 4 driving of motor vehicle described as Wagon-R car, bearing registration No.DL-9CP-1737 and died in the consequence. Accident claim case (MACT No.11/11) was instituted on 22.10.2011 by his wife and two other...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs.neha Walia & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-704-705 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL13042012 and CM214322012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates Versus NEHA WALIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Trivedi, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Advocate for R-2 & 3 Nandwani, Sameer + MAC APPEAL202013 NEHA WALIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nitinjya Chaudhary and Mr. Rajiv Kumar Trivedi, Advocates Versus THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS. Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocates for R-1 Mr. Advocate for R-2 & 3 Nandwani, Sameer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Neha Walia (claimant), then aged 22 years, pursuing a course of study leading to graduation, statedly having worked as an associate MAC Appeal No.1304/2012 & 20/2013 Page 1 of 6 with a private entity (Wipro Spectramind) and as a Sales Consult...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs.bala Devi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Order: December 12, 2017 MAC.APP. 1024/2015 & CM326162015 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates Versus BALA DEVI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shyam Singh Sisodia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 1st October, 2015 grants compensation of `1,41,834/- with interest @ 12% per annum. Respondent-claimant had suffered grievous injuries in a vehicular accident on 22nd December, 2012. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) vide impugned Award has granted compensation to respondent-claimant, whose break up is as under: - S.No.Name of heads 1.2. Loss of pain and sufferings Special diet and conveyance Amount `25,000/- `20,000/- W.P. (C) 1024/2015 Page 1 of 3 3. Expenses towards medicines (with `62,310/- bills) 4. Attendant charges for three `...
Tag this Judgment!Avadh Kaushik vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~8 & 9 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 10536/2016, CM Nos.41378/2016 & 24702/2017 AVADH KAUSHIK Through :... Petitioner in person. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus Date of decision :12. h December, 2017 Through : Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Nivesh Sharma, Adv. for R- 1&2. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. for GNCTD. + W.P.(C) 10540/2016 PURAN CHAND ARYA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Abhishek Choudhary and Mr. Rajeev Kumar Yadav, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamal deep, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, ASC for GNCTD with Mr. Rhishabh Jetley and Ms. Urvi Mohan, Advs. for GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE W.P.(C)Nos.10536/2016 & 10540/2016 Page 1 of 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 These two writ petitions were filed complaining against...
Tag this Judgment!Deepika & Ors. Vs.sehaj Ram & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-702 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h December, 2017 + MAC APPEAL13022012 DEEPIKA & ORS. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate versus SEHAJ RAM & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Golty Saluja, then aged 32 years, earning his livelihood from business, suffered injuries in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 24.02.2011, due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as Tata tempo bearing registration no.HR-46A-8927, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent (insurer) for the period in question and died in the consequence.2. In the accident claim case (115/11), instituted on 24.03.2011, by his wife and two other members of the family dependent on him, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 20.10.2011, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs.29,31,900/-, directing...
Tag this Judgment!