Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 27 of about 371 results (0.021 seconds)Pramod Kumar Vs. Arjun Anand and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~04 & 09. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2295/2009 ARJUN ANAND Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sachin Puri and Mr.Vishesh Issar, Advs. versus PRAMOD KUMAR & ORS Through : + ..... Defendants Mr.Bonny Laishram, Adv. for Mr.Ujjwal Jha, Adv. for defendants. CS(OS) 1113/2011 PRAMOD KUMAR Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Bonny Laishram, Adv. for Mr.Ujjwal Jha, Adv. versus ARJUN ANAND & ORS. Through : ..... Defendant Mr.Naresh K. Daksh and Mr.Manish Verma, Advs. for defendant Rajbir Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER1007.2014 % I.A.NO.8510/2014 IN CS(OS) 2295/2009 1. This is an application filed by plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.2. Notice in this application was issued on 5.5.2014. Learned counsel for the defendants submits that he had informed his client the next date fixed in the matter but no instructions are forthcoming 3. Mr.Puri, learned counsel for the plaintiff, submits that the reason for the defendants not contacting their counsel is on account of...
Tag this Judgment!Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants Vs. Ved Prakash Verm ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h July, 2014 % + CHAT.A.REF. 5/2012 COUNCIL OF THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Agarwal and Mr. Pulkit Agarwal, Advocate. Versus VED PRAKASH VERMA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None for respondent No.1 Mr. Anuj Aggarwal and Ms. Niti Jain, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM :HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The petitioner, having found the respondent No.1 Chartered Accountant guilty of misconduct other than any such misconduct as is referred to in Section 21(4) of The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) as it stood prior to the amendment with effect from 17th November, 2006, has forwarded the case to this Court with its recommendations thereon.2. This Court, in accordance with Section 21(6) of the Act fixed the date of hearing on 3rd December, 2012 and issued notice of the date s...
Tag this Judgment!Anant Raj Industries Limited Vs. M/S Bharat Ceramics and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2356/2009 Judgment dated 09.07.2014 ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms.Biji Rajesh for Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Advocate versus M/S BHARAT CERAMICS & ANR. F+ Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.43,44,754/- along with pendente lite and future interest.2. Summons were issued in the suit to the defendants on 11.12.2009 and on 26.2.2010. Defendant no.1 entered appearance on 11.8.2010 and filed the written statement. Summons were issued to defendant no.2 on several dates and since defendant no.2 refused to accept summons, defendant no.2 was proceeded ex parte on 29.7.2013. It may be noticed that none appeared on behalf of defendant no.1 and the counsel for defendant no.1 had sought discharge by filing I.A.4201/2014. Consequently, defendant no.1 was also proceeded ex parte on 24.4.2014.3. As per the plaint, the plain...
Tag this Judgment!Narender Kumar Shah Proprietor M/S Jay Bharat Stee Vs. M/S Sai Kripa E ...
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 431/2010 Date of decision :9. h July, 2014 NARENDER KUMAR SHAH PROPRIETOR M/S JAY BHARAT STEEL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.K.M. Dwivesh and Mr.Dilip Singh, Advocates versus M/S SAI KRIPA ENGINEERING WORKS ..... Defendant Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Costs imposed vide order dated 2.7.2014 stands waived.2. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.27,70,389/- along with pendente lite and future interests. Counsel for the plaintiff submits that the original documents were produced before the Joint Registrar, which were seen and returned.3. Summons were issued in the suit to the defendants on several dates. Defendant no.1 was served on 6.9.2011 and defendants no.2 and 3 were served by affixture on 7.8.2012. None appeared on behalf of the defendants despite service of summons, consequently defendants were proceeded ex parte vide order dated 7.3.2013.4. Plaintiff, Mr. Narend...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rachna Agarwal
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 07.2014 ITA7012012 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus RACHNA AGARWAL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr N.P. Saini, Sr. St. Counsel with Mr Nitin, Jr. St. Counsel. For the Respondent: Ms Kavita Jha. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J (ORAL) 1. The revenue is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 02.05.2012 which upheld the order of the CIT (Appeals). That order had deleted the addition of `74 lakhs sought to be deduced by the Assessing Officer as unexplained investment.2. It is urged by the revenue that in the circumstances of the case, the AO could not be held to have fallen into error in valuing the property at `1.25 crores and consequently bringing the amount of `74 lakhs to tax.3. Brief facts of the case are that upon the assessee filing the return for AY200708, ...
Tag this Judgment!Kishan Chand Dass and ors. Vs. Kuoni Travel (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. Nos. 1659-60/2004 in CS(OS) 1527/2002 Date of Decision:9. h July, 2014 + # ! KISHAN CHAND DASS AND ORS. .. Plaintiffs Through: Dr. Arun Mohan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arvind Bhatt & Mr. Kuber Giri, Advocates versus $ * KUONI TRAVEL (INDIA) LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Umang Gupta & Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This order shall dispose of I.A.No.1659/2004 under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1973(CPC) as well as I.A.No.1660/2004 under Section 152 read with Sections 151 and 153 CPC filed by the plaintiffs in their suit for partition which stood finally disposed of on 18th December,2003. The facts which are relevant for the disposal of these two applications, both of which can be conveniently disposed of by a common order, are that a suit for partition in respect of property No.F12 & 13, Connaught Place, New Delhi was filed by three ...
Tag this Judgment!R P JaIn Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12249/2009 R P JAIN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pravir Jain & Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocates versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Arora, Adv. for MCD Mr. Sudhansu Palo & Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) W.P.(C) 12249/2009 & CM APPL. No.12532/2009 1. This writ petition has been filed by Sh. R.P. Jain praying for the following reliefs:(A) issue appropriate writ, order/direction in the nature of writ thereby directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation under clause III (1) of the office order dated 13.8.2003 and consequently regularise the additional coverage on the portion of existing floor level terrace of the DDA MIG flat No.C-14, Usha Niketan, Safdarjung Development Area, New Delhi in pursuance to application dated 30.04.2004 and subsequent reminders dated 03....
Tag this Judgment!Pradeep Kumar and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 07.2014 W.P.(C) No.2052/2014 PRADEEP KUMAR & ORS ... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Samrat Nigam and Ms Ankita Mahajan For the Respondents : Ms Anjana Gosain and Mr Pradeep Desodya for respondent Nos. 1 and 5 Mr Yeeshu Jain for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 Mr Ajay Verma for DDA CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners have sought a writ of certiorari, or any other writ, order or direction in the nature thereof quashing the acquisition which was initiated by virtue of the notification dated 21.03.2003 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The petitioners also seek the quashing of the declaration dated 19.03.2004 under Section 6 of the said Act on the ground that the said notifications are contrary to the Constitution. Another prayer has...
Tag this Judgment!Prem @ Kalia Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t July, 2014 Decided on:8. h July, 2014 % + CRL.A. 179/2010 SURINDER SINGH @ RAJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 211/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1715/2013 DHARAMBIR @ BUNTY @ BOXER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Mohd. Mustafa, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 212/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1382/2012, Crl.M.A. 10005/2013 MANOJ KUMAR @ BOMB Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Jha, adv versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. + CRL.A. 210/2010 KAPIL KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. I.L. Kapoor, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashisht, Mr. Arjun, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS P...
Tag this Judgment!Surinder Singh @ Raja Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t July, 2014 Decided on:8. h July, 2014 % + CRL.A. 179/2010 SURINDER SINGH @ RAJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 211/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1715/2013 DHARAMBIR @ BUNTY @ BOXER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Mohd. Mustafa, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 212/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1382/2012, Crl.M.A. 10005/2013 MANOJ KUMAR @ BOMB Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Jha, adv versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. + CRL.A. 210/2010 KAPIL KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. I.L. Kapoor, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashisht, Mr. Arjun, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS P...
Tag this Judgment!