Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 25 of about 371 results (0.021 seconds)Major Singh and anr Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
$~3, 5, 24, 25, 27 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:14. 07.2014 + W.P. (C) 4212/2014, CM APPL.8457 & 8458/2014 SURESH CHAND & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4214/2014, CM APPL.8461 & 8462/2014 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4237/2014, CM APPL.8517/2014 YOGESH KUMAR AND ORS versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioners ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4240/2014, CM APPL.8524 & 8525/2014 MAJOR SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4243/2014, CM APPL.8527 & 8528/2014 MAHINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4244/2014, CM APPL.8529 & 8530/2014 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. Anil Mittal with Mr. Anuj Kr. Ranjan, Advocates for petitioners in all cases. Ms. Latika...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Ajs Builder Pvt. Ltd and anr Vs. Harvinder Singh
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA(OS) No.73/2013 & CM No.10379/2013 Date of Decision:14. h July, 2014 M/S AJS BUILDER PVT. LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr.Kuljeet Rawal, Adv. versus HARVINDER SINGH Through ..... Respondent Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.H.S. Kohli, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. By way of the present appeal, the appellants have challenged the order dated 25th April, 2013 whereby his Review Petition no.193/2013 was dismissed. The appellants had thereby sought review of the judgment and decree dated 23rd January, 2013 decreeing CS(OS) No.3260/2011. A preliminary objection has been pressed with regard to the maintainability of the present appeal on behalf of the respondent. It is submitted that RFA(OS) No.34/2013 assailing the judgment & decree dated 23rd January, 2013, was unconditionally withdrawn, and, therefore, the present appeal challenging the review order is not mai...
Tag this Judgment!Krishan Kumar and anr Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
$~3, 5, 24, 25, 27 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:14. 07.2014 + W.P. (C) 4212/2014, CM APPL.8457 & 8458/2014 SURESH CHAND & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4214/2014, CM APPL.8461 & 8462/2014 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4237/2014, CM APPL.8517/2014 YOGESH KUMAR AND ORS versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioners ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4240/2014, CM APPL.8524 & 8525/2014 MAJOR SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4243/2014, CM APPL.8527 & 8528/2014 MAHINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4244/2014, CM APPL.8529 & 8530/2014 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. Anil Mittal with Mr. Anuj Kr. Ranjan, Advocates for petitioners in all cases. Ms. Latika...
Tag this Judgment!indusind Bank Ltd. Vs. Iti Limited and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. 05.2014 Pronounced on :11. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 4350/2013 & C.M. No.10067/2013 INDUSIND BANK LTD. ..Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ajay Monga, Mr. Ateev. K. Mathur, Mr. Amol Sharma and Mr. Devmani Bansal, Advocates. Versus ITI LIMITED AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Ms. Jayashree Shukla Dasgupta with Ms. Vinita Sasidharan, Advocates, for Resp. No.1. Mr. Suhail Malik, Dy. Advocate General, for Govt. of J&K, for Resp. Nos. 7, 38, 39 & 63. Mr. Sunil Kumar with Mr. T.P. Singh, Advocates, for Resp. No.48/UOI. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate, for Resp. No.56. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, proxy counsel, for Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel, for Income Tax Department. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % W.P.(C) 4350/2013 Page 1 1. By these proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution, an order of the Appellate Authority for Industrial an...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India and ors. Vs. R.K. Jain
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :11. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 3325/2014, C.M. No.6853/2014 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through : Sh. Ruchir Mishra and Sh. Mukesh Kumar Tiwari, Advocates. versus R.K. JAIN ..... Respondents Through : Sh. Padma Kumar. S., Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In these proceedings, the Union of India questions a decision of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) by which the respondents application for stepping-up of pay was allowed.2. The facts are that the respondent was promoted to the post of Scientist-F from Scientist-E on 01.07.2004. He continued to hold that post when the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission were implemented with effect from 01.01.2006. The implementation was in terms of a Notification issued at that time, and subsequently governed by the Central Civil Service (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, made effective...
Tag this Judgment!Punjab and Sind Bank Vs. Tejwant Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 05.2014 Pronounced on :11. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 3498/2014, CAV. 482-484/2014 PUNJAB AND SIND BANK ..Petitioner Through: Sh. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocates. Versus TEJWANT SINGH AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Rajendra Singhvi with Sh. Kanwar Preet Singh, Advocates, for Resp. No.1/Caveator. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Cav.482-484/2014 Learned counsel for the caveators put in appearance. Cav. 482-484/2014 accordingly stand discharged. W.P.(C) 3498/2014 1. Issue notice. Sh. Rajendra Singhvi, Advocate accepts notice; Shri N.K. Kaul, learned senior counsel appears on his behalf. The Court heard the counsel for parties finally. The petitioner-bank (hereafter "the bank") is aggrieved by an order W.P.(C)3498/2014 Page 1 of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (hereafter the DRAT) allowing an appea...
Tag this Judgment!Shishpal Yadav and ors. Vs. Savita Jindal and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.17222/2010 in CS(OS) 1521/2009 + # ! Date of Decision:11. h July, 2014 SHISHPAL YADAV & ORS. .. Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Mr. Rajesh Chetri, Advocates versus $ SAVITA JINDAL AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Advocate for D-1 to 3, 7, 8 and 13 to 18 Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for D-6, 10 & 18 AND % I.A. Nos. 13229/2010 & 17219/2010 in CS(OS) 1459/2010 # ! RAMESHWAR & ORS. .. Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vivek Tripathi, Advocate versus $ SAVITA JINDAL AND ORS. I.A. No.17222/2010 in CS(OS) 1521/2009 & I.A. Nos.13229/2010 & 17219/2010 in CS(OS) 1459/2010 Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Advocate for D-1 to 3, 7, 8 and 13 to 18 Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for D-6, 10 & 18 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By this common order I shall dispose of I.A. No.17222/2010 filed by defendant No.18 under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Ci...
Tag this Judgment!Rameshwar and ors. Vs. Savita Jindal and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % I.A. No.17222/2010 in CS(OS) 1521/2009 + # ! Date of Decision:11. h July, 2014 SHISHPAL YADAV & ORS. .. Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Mr. Rajesh Chetri, Advocates versus $ SAVITA JINDAL AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Advocate for D-1 to 3, 7, 8 and 13 to 18 Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for D-6, 10 & 18 AND % I.A. Nos. 13229/2010 & 17219/2010 in CS(OS) 1459/2010 # ! RAMESHWAR & ORS. .. Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vivek Tripathi, Advocate versus $ SAVITA JINDAL AND ORS. I.A. No.17222/2010 in CS(OS) 1521/2009 & I.A. Nos.13229/2010 & 17219/2010 in CS(OS) 1459/2010 Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Advocate for D-1 to 3, 7, 8 and 13 to 18 Mr. Rajesh Yadav and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates for D-6, 10 & 18 * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By this common order I shall dispose of I.A. No.17222/2010 filed by defendant No.18 under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Ci...
Tag this Judgment!Fairdeal Polychem Llp Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:03. 07.2014 Pronounced on :11. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 1851/2014, C.M. No.3866/2014 & 3867/2014 M/S. KUMHO PETROCHEMICALS CO. LTD. ..Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran, Sh. S. Seetharaman, Sh. Atul Gupta, Sh. Lakshmi. N. and Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Himanshu Bajaj, Central Govt. Standing Counsel and Sh. M.P. Singh, Advocate with Sh. J.Gupta, Director. Ms. Shakshi Aggarwal, Advocate, for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2. Sh. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate, for Resp. No.3. + W.P.(C) 1866/2014, C.M. No.3886/2014 & 3887/2014 FAIRDEAL POLYCHEM LLP ..Petitioner Through: Sh. V. Lakshmikumaran, Sh. S. Seetharaman, Sh. Atul Gupta, Sh. Lakshmi. N. and Sh. Aditya Bhattacharya, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..Respondents Through: Sh. Himanshu Bajaj, Central Govt. Standing Counsel and Sh. M.P. Singh, Advocate with Sh. J.Gupta, Director. Ms. Shakshi ...
Tag this Judgment!Crm Services India Pvt Ltd Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 4229/2014 & CM84932014 CRM SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ... Petitioner versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Ms Kavita Jha with Ms Bhoomika Choudhury and Mr Vaibhav Kulkarni : Mr Abhishek Singh Baghel with Mr Balbir Singh CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. Since the facts are not in dispute, the matter is taken up for hearing at the first instance itself.2. The petitioner has filed an appeal being ITA No.5930/Del/2012 before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal being aggrieved by the order passed by the Dispute Resolution Panel on 29.10.2012. The Tribunal, at the initial stage, that is, on 09.01.2013, had granted stay of the demand which ha...
Tag this Judgment!