Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 26 of about 371 results (0.021 seconds)Ganesh Ram Bhatt Vs. Director of Education and anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7255 OF2011Decided on :11. 07.2014 IN THE MATTER OF GANESH RAM BHATT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amarjeet Rai, Advocate versus DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ANR. .....Respondents Through:Mr.D.Rajeshwar Rao and Mr.Charanjeet Singh, Advocates along with Mr.A.K.Meena, Dy.EO for R-1 Mr.Dilip Singh & Ms.Roshan Khan, Advocates for R-2 CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying inter alia that respondent No.1/Director of Education (DOE) be directed to take appropriate action against the respondent No.2/School(hereinafter referred as to `the School) as envisaged under Section 24 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973(in short `the Act) and permit him to resume and discharge his duties as the Principal of the School. Further, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 28.4.2011 issued by the School, suspending him w.e.f. 30.4.2011 and the letter dated 26.7.2011, for cont...
Tag this Judgment!Dharam Pal and ors. Vs. Delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:17. 12.2013 Pronounced on :11. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 5214/2011, C.M. APPL. 10579/2011 & 6798/2012 DHARAM PAL AND ORS. ..Petitioner Through: Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Sh. Piyush Sachdeva and Sh. Rahul Sharma, Advocates. Versus DELHI HIGH COURT ..Respondent Through: Sh. Chetan Lokur, for Sh. Viraj. R. Datar, Advocate, for DHC. Sh. Baldev Malik with Sh. Arjun Malik, Advocates, for Resp. No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The petitioners, working as peons and Ushers in the Delhi High Court, seek directions to quash the Office Orders dated 16.4.2004 and 14.5.2004 issued by the first respondent, the Delhi High Court (DHC) and the Report dated 18.7.2009 of the Committee constituted by the Honble Chief Justice, DHC on 1.7.2009 to consider their W.P.(C) 5214/2011 Page 1 grievances. They claim a writ of mandamus directing the DHC to fix their pay at the pay scale which...
Tag this Judgment!Forme Communications Vs. Dilip Kumar Aggarwal
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :10th July, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1640/2012 FORME COMMUNICATIONS .... Plaintiff Through : Ms.Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms.Yashodhara A. Dayal, Advocate versus DILIP KUMAR AGGARWAL Through : None ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) CS(OS) 1640/2012 1. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff for permanent injunction restraining passing off with damages. Summons were issued in the suit on 30.05.2012. Despite best efforts by the plaintiff, defendant was not served. Defendant was served through publication effected in Deccan Herald New Delhi edition dated 29.01.2013, Sanjevani dated 24.01.2013 and also in Veer Arjun dated 30.01.2013. None appeared for defendant despite notice by way of publication, consequently defendant was proceeded ex parte vide order dated 16.05.2013.2. Plaintiff has filed affidavit of Ms. Chunlu Du (PW1), General Manager Assistant of the plaintiff company....
Tag this Judgment!Syed Mehedi Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :10. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 2887/2014 SYED MEHEDI ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. Ashok Aggarwal with Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, Ms. Divya Aggarwal and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel (GNCTD) and Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. APPL. 5990/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 2887/2014 1. The petitioner challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 07.03.2014 by which his application before it, for appropriate directions with respect to age relaxation for recruitment to the post of Special Educator in the Govt. of NCT schools, was rejected. W.P.(C)2887/2014 Page 1 2. The brief facts are that the petitioner is a qualified Special Educator, holding B.Ed qualification which he acq...
Tag this Judgment!Vinod Kumar Soni Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 8166/2013 VINOD KUMAR SONI Represented by: Advocate. Mr. ..... Petitioner Alok Sinha, Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev, Record Keeper. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) C.M. APPL. 17233/2013 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P. (C) 8166/2013 1. Vide the present petition the petitioner is seeking direction to set-aside the order dated 07.06.2013 and direct the respondent to register the final decree dated 11.07.2012.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the decree was received on 11.09.2012 from Copying Agency of this court. However, the suit for partition was decreed vide order dated 26.07.2007. The other interested parties filed the RFA, which was dismissed as withdrawn on 14.12.2010. Thereafter, the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Zarina Siddiqui Vs. the State Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:10. h July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 710/2014 & CM No.1433/2014 ZARINA SIDDIQUI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajiv K. Garg and Mr.Ashish Garg, Advocates. Versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel and Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for Respondent/ GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 710/2014 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondent No.2, the Sub-Registrar III, District Central, New Delhi, to issue the certified copy of the general power of attorney executed on 07.11.1978 vide Registration No.4271 in Additional Book No.4, Volume No.110 on page No.766.2. Mr.Rajiv K. Garg, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that one A. Ramalingam, a resident of Delhi, i.e., Friends Colony, New Delhi, owner of one-third share of property bearing No.43, Mission Road, Bang...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. Ms. Satwinder Kaur
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:10. 07.2014 % W.P.(C) 1144/2014 UNION OF INDIA Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. Malaya Kumar Chand, Advocate. MS. SATWINDER KAUR Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Sahila Lambha & Ms. Karuna Chhatwal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 13.11.2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT in short) in O.A. No.2649/2012, whereby:(i) the CAT allowed the aforesaid original application, and quashed the orders dated 03.05.2012 and 19.06.2012 issued by the petitioner, whereby the respondent was declared as medically unfit by the Medical Board and the Appellate Medical Board of the petitioner respectively, and; (ii) it directed the petitioner to take consequential steps with respect to the...
Tag this Judgment!Arjun Anand Vs. Pramod Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
$~04 & 09. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2295/2009 ARJUN ANAND Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sachin Puri and Mr.Vishesh Issar, Advs. versus PRAMOD KUMAR & ORS Through : + ..... Defendants Mr.Bonny Laishram, Adv. for Mr.Ujjwal Jha, Adv. for defendants. CS(OS) 1113/2011 PRAMOD KUMAR Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.Bonny Laishram, Adv. for Mr.Ujjwal Jha, Adv. versus ARJUN ANAND & ORS. Through : ..... Defendant Mr.Naresh K. Daksh and Mr.Manish Verma, Advs. for defendant Rajbir Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI ORDER1007.2014 % I.A.NO.8510/2014 IN CS(OS) 2295/2009 1. This is an application filed by plaintiff under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.2. Notice in this application was issued on 5.5.2014. Learned counsel for the defendants submits that he had informed his client the next date fixed in the matter but no instructions are forthcoming 3. Mr.Puri, learned counsel for the plaintiff, submits that the reason for the defendants not contacting their counsel is on account of...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Il and Fs Financial Services Ltd Vs. Prakash Laljibhai Patel
Court: Delhi
$~32. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1651/2012 % Judgment dated 10.07.2014 M/S IL & FS FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD Through : Mr.Nitesh Jain, Adv. ..... Plaintiff versus PRAKASH LALJIBHAI PATEL Through ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI1 Plaintiff has filed the present suit under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure for recovery of Rs.1,75,82,666/- along with pendente lite and future interest, and costs.2. Summons in the suit were issued to the defendant in the prescribed form on 5.6.2012. The defendant could not be served by ordinary process as he had left the given address. Thereafter fresh addresses were provided, however, the defendant continued to remain unserved. Finally the defendant was served through publication, however, appearance has not been entered into by the defendant in terms of Order XXXVII Sub-Rule 3 of CPC.3. Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that since despite due service the defendant has failed to...
Tag this Judgment!Hira Lal Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : July 10, 2014 + CRL.A. 687/2006 HIRA LAL Represented by: .....Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Represented by: Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) Crl.M.A.No.9741/2014 Allowed. Crl.A.No.687/2006 1. Appellant Hira Lal was committed for the charge of having inflicted injuries by a knife on deceased Ajay Pal at 8:45 PM on September 23, 2002 at Fasil Road behind G.B.Road, Delhi with the intention of causing his death, thereby committing the offence of murder punishable under Section 302 IPC.2. The FIR Ex.PW-14/A, was registered at PS Kamla Market on September 24, 2002 at 10 minutes past 12 midnight pursuant to the statement Ex.PW-20/A made by one Mohd.Shamim, in which statement the appellant has been named as the assailant with details of the contemporaneous utterances and acts of the...
Tag this Judgment!