Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 24 of about 371 results (0.021 seconds)Raj Kumar Sethi Vs. Sunil Kumar Verma
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC.REV. 470/2013 & C.M.No.19938/2013(for stay) 15th July, 2014 % RAJ KUMAR SETHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr.Kumar Vikram, Advocate. VERSUS SUNIL KUMAR VERMA Through: ...... Respondent Respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is enjoying the benefit of interim order dated 28.2.2014, by which the impugned order dismissing the leave to defend application is stayed.2. This petition filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller dated 26.9.2013, by which the Additional Rent Controller dismissed the leave to defend application filed by the present petitioner and decreed the eviction petition for bonafide necessity.3. The tenanted premises in this case is one shop on the ground floor of the property, i.e E-10, Mansarover Park, Shahdara, Delhi-32. The respondent/landlord st...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd Bhatia Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3011/2014 MOHD BHATIA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. O. P. Saxena, APP. HC Rajpal Singh, PS Geeta Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. No.10463/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is disposed off. Crl.M.C. No.3011/2014 This petition has been moved under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that FIR No.386/2014 registered at Police Station Geeta Colony, under Sections 323 and 341 IPC at the behest of the respondent Anshu Bhola, be quashed on the ground that the parties have since entered into a compromise and settled the matter between themselves. Issue notice. Mr. Saxena, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, as well as respondent No.2 Anshu Bhola, who is present in person, accept notice. The aforesaid FIR came to be lod...
Tag this Judgment!Karoon Sem Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5237/2012 KAROON SEM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sameer Jain, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through: % ..... Respondent Dr. Ashwani Bharadwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER1507.2014 KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner is seeking issuance of writ/direction or order directing the respondents to provide the benefit of letter dated 3.10.2008 and 14.5.2009 to the petitioner and refund the amount paid by the petitioner towards the cost of training along with interest.2. Grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is that he had joined the National Defence Academy in June 2006 after having cleared the National Defence Academy examination conducted by the UPSC and had paid an amount of Rs.5,09,400/- towards the cost of training ch...
Tag this Judgment!Shankar Rekwal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~14, 15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 14, 2014 + CRL.A.54/2014 SHANKAR REKWAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Avi Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar P.S. Raja Garden CRL.A.319/2014 LALLAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar P.S. Rajouri Garden CRL.A.512/2014 AJAY @ RAMNATH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: Crl.A.No.54/2014 & CONN.MATTERS ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. It is the case of the prosecution that in furtherance of a common intention to cause the death of Shree Kishan, on the intervening night of February 24th and 25th, 2010 the appellants murdered Shree Kishan at ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S South Delhi Distributors Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:14. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 984/2014 & CM19762014 M/S SOUTH DELHI DISTRIBUTORS ..... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Richa Kapoor and Mr A.K. Hosle, Advocates For the Respondents : Ms Zubeda Begum, Standing Counsel with Ms Sana Ansari, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the notice inviting tender for running a chemist shop at Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Shahdara, Delhi110095. The case of the petitioner in brief is that the petitioner has been running the shop, which has been made the subject of the tender, under a licence from 2008 to 2011 which was extended for a further period of three years upto 11.03.2014 and under the said licence agreement, the petitioner is entitled to a final extension of three years ...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay @ Ramnath Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~14, 15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 14, 2014 + CRL.A.54/2014 SHANKAR REKWAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Avi Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar P.S. Raja Garden CRL.A.319/2014 LALLAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar P.S. Rajouri Garden CRL.A.512/2014 AJAY @ RAMNATH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: Crl.A.No.54/2014 & CONN.MATTERS ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. It is the case of the prosecution that in furtherance of a common intention to cause the death of Shree Kishan, on the intervening night of February 24th and 25th, 2010 the appellants murdered Shree Kishan at ...
Tag this Judgment!Mahinder Singh and anr Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
$~3, 5, 24, 25, 27 & 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:14. 07.2014 + W.P. (C) 4212/2014, CM APPL.8457 & 8458/2014 SURESH CHAND & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4214/2014, CM APPL.8461 & 8462/2014 NARESH KUMAR AND ORS ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4237/2014, CM APPL.8517/2014 YOGESH KUMAR AND ORS versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Petitioners ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4240/2014, CM APPL.8524 & 8525/2014 MAJOR SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4243/2014, CM APPL.8527 & 8528/2014 MAHINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent W.P. (C) 4244/2014, CM APPL.8529 & 8530/2014 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR ..... Petitioners versus DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Appearance: Mr. Anil Mittal with Mr. Anuj Kr. Ranjan, Advocates for petitioners in all cases. Ms. Latika...
Tag this Judgment!Rasool Mohd. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~R-2&3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 14, 2014 + CRL.A. 80/2014 ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State CRL.A. 81/2014 RASOOL MOHD. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Vide impugned judgment dated September 06,2013 the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC for having murdered the deceased Harpal Singh. The two have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 323/34 IPC for having caused simple hurt to Chotte, Chander Pal and Shyam.2. Vide order on sentence dated September 13, 2013 for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, the appellants have been sentenced to underg...
Tag this Judgment!Lallan Kumar Chaudhary Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~14, 15 & 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: July 14, 2014 + CRL.A.54/2014 SHANKAR REKWAL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Avi Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar P.S. Raja Garden CRL.A.319/2014 LALLAN KUMAR CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.U.M.Tripathi, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI Rajesh Kumar P.S. Rajouri Garden CRL.A.512/2014 AJAY @ RAMNATH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: Crl.A.No.54/2014 & CONN.MATTERS ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with SI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. It is the case of the prosecution that in furtherance of a common intention to cause the death of Shree Kishan, on the intervening night of February 24th and 25th, 2010 the appellants murdered Shree Kishan at ...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Kumar Aggarwal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~R-2&3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 14, 2014 + CRL.A. 80/2014 ASHOK KUMAR AGGARWAL ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State CRL.A. 81/2014 RASOOL MOHD. Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Vide impugned judgment dated September 06,2013 the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC for having murdered the deceased Harpal Singh. The two have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 323/34 IPC for having caused simple hurt to Chotte, Chander Pal and Shyam.2. Vide order on sentence dated September 13, 2013 for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC, the appellants have been sentenced to underg...
Tag this Judgment!