Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 22 of about 371 results (0.047 seconds)Avinash Sharma @ Nandi Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: July 15, 2014 % + CRL.A. 456/2000 AVINASH SHARMA @NANDI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with Insp.Manoj Pant and SI Sanjay, PS Gandhi Nagar CRL.A. 556/2000 AMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.K.Singh, Advocate with Mr.Pramod K.Tiwary, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with Insp.Manoj Pant and SI Sanjay, PS Gandhi Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Committed to face trial for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC on the allegation that sharing a common intention, the appellants inflicted knife blows on the person of the deceased Virender Singh on February 16, 1992 at about 8.00 P.M., vide impugned judgment dated July 05, 2000 the appellants have been...
Tag this Judgment!Saleem @ Baniya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: July 15, 2014 + CRL.A.591/1999 SALEEM @ BANIYA Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Krishan Kumar and Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocates. versus STATE Represented by: .... Respondent Mr.Vinod Diwakar, APP for the State with SI Vivek Sharma, PS Gokalpuri, Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vide judgment dated September 29, 1999 the appellant has been convicted for offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and 27 Arms Act. The order on sentence dated September 30, 1999 directs appellant to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of `5,000/- for the offence under Section 302 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and a fine of `1,000/- for the offence under Section 27 Arms Act. During the pendency of the present appeal, the sentence of the appellant was suspended however, he failed to appear at the time of the hearing and thus non-bailable warrants we...
Tag this Judgment!Amar Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 11, 2014 Judgment Pronounced on: July 15, 2014 % + CRL.A. 456/2000 AVINASH SHARMA @NANDI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Gurinder Pal Singh, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with Insp.Manoj Pant and SI Sanjay, PS Gandhi Nagar CRL.A. 556/2000 AMAR SINGH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.K.Singh, Advocate with Mr.Pramod K.Tiwary, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP with Insp.Manoj Pant and SI Sanjay, PS Gandhi Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Committed to face trial for the offence punishable under Section 302/34 IPC on the allegation that sharing a common intention, the appellants inflicted knife blows on the person of the deceased Virender Singh on February 16, 1992 at about 8.00 P.M., vide impugned judgment dated July 05, 2000 the appellants have been...
Tag this Judgment!Vibhas Kumar Jha Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h July, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3825/2013 VIBHAS KUMAR JHA Through: ..... Petitioner Petitioner-in-person with Mr. Vibudh Singh, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA .........Respondent Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India alleges discrimination by the respondent Railways between the wait-listed passengers who have purchased e-tickets through the internet and the waitlisted passengers who have purchased tickets in the physical form from the Reservation Counters of the respondent Railways. It is contended that while the wait-listed passengers holding e-tickets are prohibited from boarding the train, the wait-listed passengers holding tickets in the physical form are entitled to board the train and take a chance of occupying any seats / berths available owing to no-show of the passenger...
Tag this Judgment!Naresh Kumar Vs. Meer Singh (Dead) Thr His Lrs and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h July, 2014 % FAO(OS) 41/2014 & CM No.1032/2014 (for stay) NARESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Adv. with appellant in person. Versus MEER SINGH (DEAD) THR HIS LRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates. AND + FAO(OS) 63/2014 & CM No.1582/2014 (for stay) RAJ RANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Adv. Versus MEER SINGH (DEAD) THR HIS LRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 Both the appeals impugn the same order dated 29th November, 2013 (of the learned Single Judge exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.831/2006 filed by the respondent no.1 / plaintiff) of allowing IA No.3406/2013 filed by the respondent no.1 / plaintiff for rejection of the written statement filed by each of the appellants ...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Rani Vs. Meer Singh (Dead) Thr His Lrs and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h July, 2014 % FAO(OS) 41/2014 & CM No.1032/2014 (for stay) NARESH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Adv. with appellant in person. Versus MEER SINGH (DEAD) THR HIS LRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates. AND + FAO(OS) 63/2014 & CM No.1582/2014 (for stay) RAJ RANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ratnesh Bansal, Adv. Versus MEER SINGH (DEAD) THR HIS LRS & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 Both the appeals impugn the same order dated 29th November, 2013 (of the learned Single Judge exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.831/2006 filed by the respondent no.1 / plaintiff) of allowing IA No.3406/2013 filed by the respondent no.1 / plaintiff for rejection of the written statement filed by each of the appellants ...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Vidya Devi Vs. Sh. Deep Chand and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.28/2010 15th July , 2014 % SMT. VIDYA DEVI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Manu Nayar, Advocate. VERSUS SH. DEEP CHAND AND ORS. Through: ...... Respondents None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This petition impugns the order of the trial Court dated 28.10.2009 declining the prayer of the petitioner, who is plaintiff in one suit and defendant in a connected suit, for passing of a consent decree in view of the alleged agreed settlement before the Mediation Centre of the district court on 21.3.2007.2. No doubt, there was an agreed settlement on 21.3.2007, but, the impugned order shows that there was passed a subsequent order by the learned Mediator dated 10.4.2007 by which the matter was referred to the Court for judicial adjudication inasmuch as there was a factual mistake in the settlement agreement dated 21.3.2007 with respect to width of the passage which ...
Tag this Judgment!Perfetti Van Melle India Pvt Ltd Vs. M/S Mahek Enterprises and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1654/2012 & I.A. 7774/2013 % Judgment dated 15.07.2014 PERFETTI VAN MELLE INDIA PVT LTD..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rajive R. Ray, Advocate versus M/S MAHEK ENTERPRISES & ORS ..... Defendants Through; Mr.A. Jain for Mr.Aseem Mehrotra, Advocate for the defendants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Counsel for the defendants seeks an adjournment, as the arguing counsel is in some personal difficulty. The adjournment is opposed by counsel for the plaintiff. Counsel for the plaintiff further submits that the leave to defend application is not on record. The request for adjournment is declined.2. Plaintiff has filed the present suit under the provisions of Order 37 CPC for recovery of Rs.32,13,485/- including the interest @ 18%. The suit is based on invoices and dishonoured cheques.3. The defendants entered appearance, as noticed in the order dated 3.4.2013, and, thereafter an application IA.No.7774/2013 w...
Tag this Judgment!Airwaves Telefilms Pvt Ltd and ors. Vs. ..........
Court: Delhi
$~21 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET.96 /2014 IN THE MATTER OF AIRWAVES TELEFILMS PVT LTD ......Petitioners & ORS. Through: Mr. Dilip Singh Advocate for Petitioner companies, Mr. Atma Sah, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director, Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate for the official Liquidator. CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER1507.2014 % SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This second motion joint petition filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking sanction of the Scheme of A malgamation (Scheme) of M/s Airwaves Telefilms Private Limited ( Transferor Company No 1), Limited M/s Lavitra Technologies Private (Transferor Company No 2 , M/s Suave Technologies Private Limited (Transferor Company No3) and Waves Telefilms Private Limited (Transferor ================================================== CO.PET. 96 /2014 1 Company No4) with M/s Dolf Leasing Limited (the Transferee Company) and their respective Shareholders and Credi...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Aristocrat Realcon Private Limited and ors. Vs. ..........
Court: Delhi
$~22 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET.98 /2014 IN THE MATTER OF M/S ARISTOCRAT REALCON PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. ......Petitioners Through: Mr. Dilip Singh Advocate for Petitioner companies, Mr. Atma Sah, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director, Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate for the official Liquidator. CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER1507.2014 % SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This second motion joint petition filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking sanction of the Scheme of A malgamation (Scheme) of M/s Aristocrat Realcon Private Limited (Transferor Company No 1), M/s Astonish Construction Private Limited (Transferor Company No 2), M/s Crimson Promoters Private Limited (Transferor Company No 3), M/s Flame Developers Private Limited (Transferor Company No 4), M/s Goverdhan Impex Private ================================================== CO.PET. 98 /2014 1 Limited (Transferor Company No5) and Honeydew (Trans...
Tag this Judgment!