Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 28 of about 371 results (0.022 seconds)National Textile Corporation Ltd. Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:08. h July, 2014 + Review Petition No.286/2014, CM No.10198/2014 (for condonation of 57 days delay in applying therefor) & CM No.10200/2014 (for impleadment of Union of India also through the Ministry of Textiles and Sitaram Mills Ltd. as respondents to the appeal) in LPA8082012. NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. Versus UOI & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Arti Singh, Adv. for R-2/Review Petitioner. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The respondent no.2 UCO Bank seeks review of judgment dated 10th February, 2014 allowing the aforesaid appeal.2. We have, without entering into the aspect of delay in applying for review, heard the counsel for the review applicant / respondent no.2 on merits of the review petition.3. We may at the outset state that the counsel who has applied for review on b...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Kumar Varun Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No.190 of 2009 Reserved on: May 28, 2014 Decision on: July 8, 2014 RAJ KUMAR VARUN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. N. Hariharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gurpreet Singh and Mr. Bakul Jain, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Narender Mann, Spl. PP with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Uttkarsha Kohli, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0807.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27th February 2009 passed by the learned Special Judge in CC No.89/04 convicting the Appellant under Section 7 and 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and the order on sentence dated 28th February 2009 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for two years with a fine of Rs. 10,000, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for seven days for the offence under Section 7 of the PC Act and RI for three years with...
Tag this Judgment!Butna Devi Vs. Amit Talwar and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:08. h July, 2014 % + FAO (OS) No.521/2013 BUTNA DEVI Through: .. Appellant Mr. R.M. Sinha, Adv. Versus AMIT TALWAR & ORS. .. Respondents Through: Mr. Aman Mehta, Adv. for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 1 st October, 2013 (of the learned Single Judge of this Court in exercise of Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction in CS(OS) No.1687/2006 filed by the appellant) of allowing the application of the respondent / defendant no.1 for amendment of the written statement.2. The appeal was accompanied with an application for condonation of 12 days delay in filing thereof. Notice only of the application for condonation of delay was issued. Though a reply is purported to be filed on behalf of the respondent / defendant no.1 to the application for condonation of delay but is not on record, being under objection, though rejoinder fi...
Tag this Judgment!Kapil Kumar Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t July, 2014 Decided on:8. h July, 2014 % + CRL.A. 179/2010 SURINDER SINGH @ RAJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 211/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1715/2013 DHARAMBIR @ BUNTY @ BOXER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Mohd. Mustafa, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 212/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1382/2012, Crl.M.A. 10005/2013 MANOJ KUMAR @ BOMB Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Jha, adv versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. + CRL.A. 210/2010 KAPIL KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. I.L. Kapoor, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashisht, Mr. Arjun, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS P...
Tag this Judgment!Navalokam Samskarika Kendram Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.3348/2014 & CM No.6892/2014 (for interim direction). NAVALOKAM SAMSKARIKA KENDRAM .. Petitioner Through: Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Ms. Mallika Ahluwalia and Mr. Mayank Bamniyal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna with Ms. Sara Sundaram, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Parth Goswami with Mr. Hemant Phalpher, Advs. for R-4. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The petitioner has filed this petition in Public Interest qua the denial of Arjuna Award for the year 2013 to Shri Renjith Maheswari inspite of declaration of his name as recipient thereof and after preparatory steps for conferment of the said award on Shri Renjith Maheswari had been taken. The said denial being owing to the respondent no.4 Athletics Federation of India (AFI) having found the said Shri Renjith Maheswari to be in viol...
Tag this Judgment!indo Rolhard Industries Ltd. Vs. M. K. Mahajan and anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO. APP. NO.25/2014 and CM No.7626/2014 INDO ROLHARD INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manoj Kumar Garg, Advocate. versus M. K. MAHAJAN & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Ms.Vibha Mahajan Seth, Advocate. Mr.Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. % Date of Decision : July 8th, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present appeal is preferred against the order dated 13.02.2014 passed by the learned Single Judge in Company Application No.898/2013 of Company Petition No.136/2005 filed by the Respondent No.1 under Rule 9 read with Rule 29 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959.2. The facts necessary for deciding the appeal are briefly delineated hereunder.3. A Company Petition was filed by the Respondents alleging that the Appellant Company is liable to be wound up under Sections 433(c), (e) and (f) read with Section 434(1)(a) and (c) of the Companies A...
Tag this Judgment!Dharambir @ Bunty @ Boxer Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t July, 2014 Decided on:8. h July, 2014 % + CRL.A. 179/2010 SURINDER SINGH @ RAJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 211/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1715/2013 DHARAMBIR @ BUNTY @ BOXER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Mohd. Mustafa, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 212/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1382/2012, Crl.M.A. 10005/2013 MANOJ KUMAR @ BOMB Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Jha, adv versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. + CRL.A. 210/2010 KAPIL KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. I.L. Kapoor, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashisht, Mr. Arjun, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS P...
Tag this Judgment!Manoj Kumar @ Bomb Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t July, 2014 Decided on:8. h July, 2014 % + CRL.A. 179/2010 SURINDER SINGH @ RAJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sidharth Yadav, Adv. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 211/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1715/2013 DHARAMBIR @ BUNTY @ BOXER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Mohd. Mustafa, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. CRL.A. 212/2010 & Crl.M.B. 1382/2012, Crl.M.A. 10005/2013 MANOJ KUMAR @ BOMB Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Jha, adv versus STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS Prasad Nagar. + CRL.A. 210/2010 KAPIL KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. I.L. Kapoor, Mr. Satya Narayan Vashisht, Mr. Arjun, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kr. Singh, APP with SI Abhishek Kumar, PS P...
Tag this Judgment!Balaram Kispotta and Another Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.4135/2014 BALARAM KISPOTTA & ANOTHER ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.8309/2014 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.4135/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the signals dated 28.05.2013 and 03.07.2013 whereunder the respondents have denied benefits to the Petitioners under the ACP Scheme to the extent that the Petitioners have been held eligible for the 2 nd financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme from the completion of the promotional course (SUOCC) and not from completion of 24 years of regular service. The Petitioners have further prayed for directions to the respondents to grant 2nd financial upgradation benefits to the Petitioners...
Tag this Judgment!Sub.insp.Satyawan (Force No.800140488) Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.4130/2014 SUB.INSP.SATYAWAN (FORCE NO.800140488) Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.8302/2014 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.4130/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the signals dated 28.05.2013 and 03.07.2013 whereunder the respondents have denied benefits to the Petitioner under the ACP Scheme to the extent that the Petitioner has been held eligible for the 2nd financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme from the completion of the promotional course (SUOCC) and not from completion of 24 years of regular service. The Petitioner has further prayed for directions to the respondents to grant 2nd financial upgradation benefits to the Petiti...
Tag this Judgment!