Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 29 of about 371 results (0.022 seconds)Yogesh Aggarwal and anr Vs. Vikas Goyal and anr
Court: Delhi
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2259/2013 & I.A. 18582/2013 % Judgment dated 08.07.2014 YOGESH AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.J.M. Bari, Advocate versus VIKAS GOYAL & ANR ..... Defendant Through: Mr.Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Plaintiffs have filed the present suit for recovery of money and in the alternative for specific performance of the contract dated 29.1.2013. Pleadings are complete and admission / denial of documents has been carried out. All the documents stand admitted by the parties.2. Mr.Bari, counsel for the plaintiffs submits that he wishes to give up relief of specific performance and restricts his relief only to recovery of Rs.45.0 lacs paid as part payment for the purchase of the suit property i.e entire second floor without roof rights of property bearing No.G-202, area measuring 211 sq. yrds. situated at Pushkar Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi along with proportionate f...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax-iii Vs. Dimension Apparels Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. 07.2014 + + + + ITA3282014, C.M. No.10528/2014 ITA3292014 ITA3302014, C.M. No.10641/2014 ITA3322014, C.M. No.10690/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Versus DIMENSION APPARELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Suruchii Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel for the revenue. None on behalf of the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % For detailed judgment, the decision dated 08.07.2014 in ITA3272014 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) VIBHU BAKHRU (JUDGE) JULY08 2014 ITA3282014 TO3302014 & 332/2014 Page 1...
Tag this Judgment!Randhir Singh and Others Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.4137/2014 RANDHIR SINGH & OTHERS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, CGSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.8312/2014 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.4137/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the signals dated 28.05.2013 and 03.07.2013 whereunder the respondents have denied benefits to the Petitioners under the ACP Scheme to the extent that the Petitioners have been held eligible for the 2 nd financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme from the completion of the promotional course (SUOCC) and not from completion of 24 years of regular service. The Petitioners have further prayed for directions to the respondents to grant 2nd financial upgradation benefits to the Petitioners und...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.4138/2014 RAKESH KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Niraj Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI ORDER (ORAL) : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.CM No.8313/2014 Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. WP(C) No.4138/2014 1. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the signals dated 28.05.2013 and 03.07.2013 whereunder the respondents have denied benefits to the Petitioner under the ACP Scheme to the extent that the Petitioner has been held eligible for the 2nd financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme from the completion of the promotional course (SUOCC) and not from completion of 24 years of regular service. The Petitioner has further prayed for directions to the respondents to grant 2nd financial upgradation benefits to the Petitioner under the ACP Scheme ...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Customs Vs. Ginni International Ltd.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 07.2014 CUSAA072014 COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ..... Appellant versus GINNI INTERNATIONAL LTD. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing Counsel. For the Respondent: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J (OPEN COURT) 1. The office report discloses that the assessee/respondent was served. There is, however, no appearance on its behalf.2. Admit.3. The following question of law arise:Did the Tribunal commit an error of law in holding that the respondent/assessee was entitled to the benefit of the DTA Scheme as claimed by it in the circumstances of the case?.4. The facts on record show that the respondent/assessee was a registered Export Oriented Unit (EOU). On 04.03.2008 it applied for obtaining of the no objection certificate and claimed that no tax liability existed on that day. It, ther...
Tag this Judgment!Charanjeet Singh Rekhi Vs. Harish Ahuja and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 07.2014 FAO(OS) 202/2013 & CM Nos.6127/2013, 13451/2013 & 1/2014 CHARANJEET SINGH REKHI ..... Appellant versus HARISH AHUJA & ORS. ..... Respondents AND + FAO(OS) 212/2013 & CM No.6449/2013 CHARANJEET SINGH REKHI ..... Appellant versus HARI MOHAN SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents AND + FAO(OS) 235/2013 & CM No.7325/2013 CHARANJEET SINGH REKHI & ORS. ..... Appellants versus CSR POULTRY RESEARCH & BREADING FARM & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellants : Ms Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr Rajeev Kumar and Mr Harish Malik, in FAO(OS) 202/2013 & 212/2013. Mr M. Qayam-Ud-Din in FAO(OS) 235/2013 For the Respondents : Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate alongwith Ms Neelima Tripathi, for R-1. Mr Anil Airi, Mr Hemant Manjani and Mr Pratyush Sharma, for R-2 & 3 in FAO(OS) 202/2013 Mr Suhail Dutt, Sr. Advocate alongwith Mr Anil Kapur, for R-1 & 3 Mr Anil Airi, Mr Hemant Manjani and Mr P...
Tag this Judgment!Virtus Dordrecht B.V. and anr. Vs. Vikram Bhargava and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~F-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h February, 2014 Decided on:7. h July, 2014 + CS(OS) 674/1998 VIRTUS DORDRECHT B.V. & ANR. Through: ..... Plaintiffs Mr. L.K. Singh and Mr. S.K. Singh, Advs. Versus VIKRAM BHARGAVA & ORS. Through: ..... Defendants Mr. Deepak Chawla and Mr. Raghav Paul, Advs. for defendant No.1(c) Mr. B.K. Sood, Mr. Meharjit Singh, and Mr. Manik Sood, Adv. for D-2 to D-4. Mr. Arun Bhatia, Adv. for D-6 Coram: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. Plaintiffs have filed this suit against the defendants for recovery of Rs.2,14,66,030/- together with pendent lite and future interest @ 18% per annum; for declaration that the properties, as detailed in Annexure 7 collectively and Annexure 12, are the properties purchased from the funds of plaintiffs and defendants have no right, title or interest therein; a decree of permanent injunction to the effect that defendants be restrained from selling, transferring, mortgaging or alienating th...
Tag this Judgment!Deepender Kumar @ Chhotu Vs. the State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :17. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :7. h JULY , 2014 + CRL.A.No.496/2012 DEEPENDER KUMAR @ CHHOTU Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Chetan Lokur, Advocate. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 08.02.2012 of learned Special Judge (NDPS) / Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.07/10 arising out of FIR No.10/10 PS Narcotics Branch by which the appellant Deepender Kumar @ Chhotu was convicted under Section 21 (c) of the NDPS Act. By an order dated 15.02.2012, he was sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine ` 1 lac.2. Briefly stated, the prosecution case as unfolded in the charge- sheet was that on 04.02.2010 at about 05.05 P.M. near Bus Stop, Metro Station Seelampur, Delhi, the appellant was found in possession of 500 gms. of Heroin having 0.73% diacetylmorphine, a contraband, without licence or...
Tag this Judgment!Mithlesh Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h July, 2014 % + W.P.(C) 1618/2014 MITHLESH KUMAR SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Avdhesh Kumar Singh and Mr. M.K. Singh, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.V. Sinha and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. for R-1,3&4. Mr. Sachin Datta with Ms. Ritika Vhurani, Advs. for UOI. Mr. P.K. Sharma with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma and Ms. Renu Malik, Advs. for R-6/CBI. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition, filed by way of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeks (i) a direction to the Ministry of Railways, Railway Board, Prime Minister Office, Lok Sabha Secretariat, the Director, CBI and the Planning Commission of India to provide the details of documents relating to purchase of jacks, appointment of candidates in the Railway Recruitment Board, Patna, financial irregularities in extension of railway line and s...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. Bimla Devi and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL. A. 480/1998 Date of Decision:7. h July, 2014 + # SMT. BIMLA Devi & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. K.B.Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr. M.L. Yadav and Mr. Ajay Chaudhary, Advs. Versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: The two appellants are mother and son and they have been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302/201/34 IPC by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 14th October, 1998 and have been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay fine of Rs.5,000 /- each with a default stipulation for their conviction for the offence of murder and three years rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.2000/- with a default stipulation of three months rigorous imprisonment under Section 201/34 IPC vide order dated 23rd October, 1998. They were tried for these offences along with one Deepak, ...
Tag this Judgment!