Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar @ Sanjay Vs. State of Nct Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :03. d JULY, 2014 + CRL.A.No.263/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.345/2011 RAJESH KUMAR @ SANJAY ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Pankaj Singh, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CRL.A.No.211/2011 DAYA RAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. AND + CRL.A.No.212/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.676/2012 MUKESH KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sudhansu Palo, Advocate with Mr.T.K.Mahapatro, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Rajesh Kumar @ Sanjay (A-1), Daya Ram (A-2) and Mukesh Kumar (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 29.11.2010 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.30A/09 arising out of FIR No.241/07 PS Sarojini Nagar by which A-1 and A-3 under Sec...
Aman Lekhi and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
#28 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3263/2014 & CM APPL. 6739/2014 AMAN LEKHI & ORS. Through ..... Petitioners Petitioners, Mr. Aman Lekhi and Ms. Manali Singhal in person with Ms. Richa Oberai and Mr. Abhikalp P. Singh, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. B.V. Niren, CGSC for R-1/UOI. Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manoj K. Das, Advocate for R-19/NBCC. Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate for R-2, 13, 17 & 18. Mr. Pushkar Sood with Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Advocates and Mr. A.S. Rao, Law Officer for R-5/DMRC. Mr. B. Mahapatra, Advocate with Mr. D. Jindal, Law Officer for R-8. Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Chitranshul Sinha with Mr. Kabin David, Advocates for R-10. Mr. Jayant Tripathi, Advocate for R-11. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN % W.P.(C) 3263/2014 ORDER Despite opportunity, no counter-affidavit has been filed by the main contesting parties, namely, NBCC, Union of India and DDA. Mr. Aman Lekhi, petitioner No...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Om Prakash and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:3. d July, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 518/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. P.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus OM PRAKASH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) C.M. APPL. 9742/2014 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. MAC. APP. 518/2014 1. Admit.2. Vide the present appeal the appellant/ Insurance Company has challenged the award dated 05.03.2014 whereby the learned Tribunal awarded compensation for an amount of Rs.6,97,140/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition till realisation of the amount.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the age of the deceased was 21 years on the date of the accident i.e. 03.03.2007 and he was a bachelor, thus, learned Tribunal ought to have applied the multiplier as p...
Mukhtiar Singh @ Babloo Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :3. d July, 2014 + CRL.A. 49/2011 MUKHTIAR SINGH @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through : Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. + CRL.A. 439/2011 MUKESH KUMAR @ RAJESH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.(ORAL) 1. Mukhtiar Singh @ Babloo (A-1) and Mukesh Kumar @ Rajesh (A-2) challenge the correctness and legality of a judgment dated 31.07.2010 of learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.7/07 arising out of FIR No.82/06 registered at Police Station Narcotics Branch by which they were held guilty under Sections 15/25 NDPS Act. By an order dated 06.08.2010, A-1 was sentenced to undergo RI for 15 years with fine ` 2 lacs under Section 15 NDPS Act; RI for ten years with fine `1 lac under Section 25 NDPS Act. A-2 was awarded RI for 10 y...
Daya Ram Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :15. h APRIL, 2014 DECIDED ON :03. d JULY, 2014 + CRL.A.No.211/2011 DAYA RAM Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ajay Verma, Advocate with Mr.Shiv Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. AND + CRL.A.No.212/2011 MUKESH KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Sudhansu Palo, Advocate with Mr.T.K.Mahapatro, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals stand allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.263/2011 titled Rajesh Kumar @ Sanjay vs. State of NCT of Delhi. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE JULY03 2014 / TR...
Vodafone Spacetel Limited and anr. Vs. .....
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NE W DELHI CO. PET. No.187 OF2013IN THE MATTER OF: .P ETITIONER C OMPANIES V ODAFONE SPACETEL L IMITED & A NR. Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Singhi, Mr. Anirudh Das and Mr. Kamaljeet Singh, Advoca tes for the Petitioner Companies. Mr. Atma Sah, Assistant Registrar of Companies appearing for the Regional Director. Mr. Rajeev Bahl, appearing for the Official Liquidator. CORA M : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER0307.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This second motion joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") by M/s Vodafone Spacetel Limited (Transferor No.1/ Petitioner Company No.1), Vodafone West Limited (Transferor No.2) and Vodafone Mobile Company/ Petitioner Services Limited Company No.2) (Transferee and their ========================================================== respective shareholders seeking sanction and approval of the Scheme of Ama...
Gopal Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 21st April, 2014 Date of decision :3. d July, 2014 % + LPA4082013 and CM APPL. 9309/2013 GOPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bijender Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate + LPA3912013 and CM APPL. 9111/2013 BHARAT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bijender Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate + LPA3922013 and CM APPL. 9114/2013 UDAI VEER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bijender Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate + LPA3942013 and CM APPL. 9126/2013 DEVINDER ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bijender Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate + LPA3952013 and CM APPL. 9134/2013 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Bijender Singh, Advocate versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms...
Microsoft Corporation and anr Vs. Mr. Rajeev Trehan and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 130/2008 Date of decision :03rd July, 2014 % MICROSOFT CORPORATION & ANR Through : Mr. Ashsish Somasia, Advocate .... Plaintiff versus MR. RAJEEV TREHAN & ANR. Through : None ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiffs have filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyrights, delivery up, rendition of accounts of profits, damages etc. Summons were issued in the suit on 23.01.2008, 29.04.2008, 10.11.2008 and 29.04.2009. On 13.08.2009 Defendant No.2 entered appearance and fresh summons were issued to Defendant No.1. None appeared on behalf of Defendant No.1 despite service, hence Defendant No.1 was proceeded ex parte on 15.01.2010 and Defendant no.2 was deleted from the array of parties as there was no necessity of impleading the proprietary concern of its business name as defendant no.2.2. On 17.08.2010, defendant No.1 put in appearance and filed a...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Sh Rajbir Singh Ex Conductor
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-03-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA No.799/2013 & CM Nos.16940/2013 & 4331/2014 Date of Decision:3. d July, 2014 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through ..... Appellant Mr.Abhay N. Das, Advocate versus SH RAJBIR SINGH EX CONDUCTOR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Vaishalee Mehra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. The appellant before us assails the judgment dated 28th May, 2013 passed in WP (C) No.2739/2004 whereby the court overturned the order dated 17th October, 2001 as well as the industrial Award dated 5th September, 2003 passed in ID95696.2. By the order dated 17th October, 2001, the Labour Court had decided the preliminary issue with regard to the legality and validity of the inquiry conducted by the present appellant in his favour. The challenge by the respondent herein resulted in industrial Award dated 5th September, 2003 whereby the termination and punishment imposed upon him was held to be in acco...
Shri NaraIn Singh Etc. Vs. the State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-02-2014
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI F.A.O. No.279/2007 & C.M. Nos.9537/2007, 15901/2010, 22370/2011, 887/2012, 15378/2012, 17632/2012, 20036/2012, 1133/2013 & Crl. M.A. No.699/2013 Decided on :2. d July, 2014 SHRI NARAIN SINGH ETC. Appellants Through: Mr. Daljit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. D.K. Thakur & Mr. A.K. Saini, Advocates. Versus THE STATE & ORS Through: Respondents Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gurmehar Sistani, Mr. Vikas Gautam, Mr. Arjun Syal & Ms. Kartika Sharma, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the judgment dated 15.5.2007 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi by virtue of which the letter of administration was granted in favour of respondent No.2, Jagdish Chand (hereinafter referred to as Jagdish Chand) in respect of Will dated 22.10.1973 exhibit A-1 purported to have been made by deceased Nathu Singh.2. Briefly stated the facts as given in the imp...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »