Delhi Court July 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 20 of about 371 results (0.025 seconds)Ashok Kumar Bansal Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 701/2014 and CM No.1398/2014 ASHOK KUMAR BANSAL ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Indu Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr Uttam Datt, Mr Shubham Aggarwal, Ms Nishtha and Mr Varun For the Respondents : Mr Maninder Singh, ASG with Mr Sachin Datta, Ms Ritika Jhurani and Ms Niti Arora for UOI Mr Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate with Mr Atul Shanker Mathur, Ms Shruti Verma, Mr Abhisaar Bairagi, Mr Aseem Chaturvedi and Ms Kanika Tandon for respondent No.2 Ms Zubeda Begum for GNCTD Ms Anjana Gosain for respondent No.3 CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks the issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling upon the respondent No.1 to produce the record pertaining to its decision dated 31.12.2013, whereby the respondent No.3 has been...
Tag this Judgment!Geetika Verma Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: July 17, 2014 + I.A. No.7891/2014 in Test Case 93/2012 GEETIKA VERMA Through ..... Petitioner Ms.Sana Ansari, Adv. along with petitioner in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The abovementioned application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC seeking certain directions to the effect that the Registry be asked to accept personal bond instead of Administration Bond with one surety. The facts of the matter are that the above said probate petition was disposed of on 27th March, 2014. The probate of the Will dated 14th October, 1996 was granted. The Registry issued the letter dated 5th April, 2014 directing the petitioner to file Administrative Bond with one surety. The petitioner was also called upon to give valuation of the property as well as that of movable assets.2. The valuation report has already been filed. As regards the req...
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. Kurma Rao M. and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision:17. 07.2014 % W.P.(C) 4515/2013 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Mr. R.V. Sinha, Advocate Petitioner versus KURMA RAO M. AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Aditya Ranjan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The Union of India (UOI) challenges the order dated 28.02.2013 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/Tribunal) passed in O.A. No.1555/2012, whereby it quashed the cadre allocation of the respondent/applicant, and directed reconsideration of the entire issue.2. The brief facts are that the respondent/applicant was declared as a successful OBC candidate in the Civil Services Examination, 2010. The UOI, after taking into consideration his performance and the prevailing guidelines, circulars and other norms, allocated Karnataka cadre to the respondent/applicant.3. The respondent/applicant, who had applied for his home cadre which is ...
Tag this Judgment!Anil Khanna and anr Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 388/2011 & Crl. M. A.1539/2011 ANIL KHANNA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Bharti Tyagi, Advocate for petitioners. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Shri P. K. Mishra, APP for State with SI Bhanu Pratap, PS Mandir Marg. Shri Vipin Kumar Anand, Advocate for respondent No.2/complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA ORDER % 17.07.2014 % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) On 09.02.2011, this Court directed the complainant, Smt. Nonie Khanna, to be impleaded as respondent No.2 in this petition. On 16th July, 2014 broad terms, upon which parties had agreed to a settlement were recorded; and the matter was posted for today for recording their statements. Today the petitioners Shri Anil Khanna and Smt. Sunita Khanna as well as the complainant, Smt. Mamta, who is also known as Nonie Khanna, are all present in person. Let their statements be recorded on oath. Statements of the parties hav...
Tag this Judgment!Shanti Lal Meena Vs. State Through: Cbi
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRIMINAL APPEAL No.326 of 2008 Reserved on: July 7, 2014 Decision on: July 17, 2014 SHANTI LAL MEENA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sidharth Arora and Mr. Atif Shamim, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH: CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, Special Public Prosecutor. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT1707.2014 1. The challenge in this appeal is to a judgment dated 29th March 2008 passed by the learned Special Judge in CC No.194 of 2001 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) and an order on sentence dated 31st March 2008 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for two years with a fine of Rs.15,000 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for 15 days and RI for two years with a fine of Rs.15,000 and in default to undergo SI for 15 days for the offence under Sec...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Infinity Sez Private Ltd. Vs. I.F.C.i. and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~6. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.13923/2009 Date of decision:17. h July, 2014 M/S INFINITY SEZ PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Mr. Srinivas Kotni, Mr. Mukul Chandra, Mr. Amit Vaswani & Mr. Ajay Yadav, Advocates. versus I.F.C.I. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Karan Dev, Advocate for Mr. Suresh Dutt Dobhal, Advocate for respondent No.1-IFCI. Mr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pushkar Sood, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Anshuman Sood & Mr. Dharmender Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.3. Mr. P.K. Mullick, Advocate for respondent No.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states: (i) The issue and question relating to Rs.1.70 crores deposited in the No Lien Account will be raised before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under the provisions of ...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Ram Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3067/2013 RAMESH RAM Through: ....Petitioner Ms. Rekha Palli & Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Central Government Standing Counsel with Ms. Gurjinder Kaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI ORDER1607.2014 % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.(Oral) 1. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a Head Constable with CISF seeks to challenge the order dated 19.12.2008 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, order dated 28.05.2009 passed by the Reviewing Authority and the order dated 23.10.2009 passed by the Appellate Authority.2. The gist of the facts giving rise to the filing of the present petition can be summarised as under:- The Petitioner had joined the central Industrial Security Force as a constable on 30.09.1976.The petitioner was promoted as a Naik in 1983 and thereafter, as...
Tag this Judgment!idpl Vrs/Retired Employees Welfare Federation Gurg Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA5762013 IDPL VRS/RETIRED EMPLOYEES WELFARE FEDERATION GURGAON, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, Y R SURI & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Y.R. Suri, Secretary of the Appellants. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna and Mr. Kartikeya Bhargava, Advocates for R-1. Mr. R.S. Mathur, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG ORDER1607.2014 : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.(Oral) CM No.12151/2013 This is an application praying for condonation of 31 days delay in re-filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in para 2 of the application, the delay in re-filing is condoned. Application stands disposed of. LPA5762013 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 8th April, 2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.261/2010.2. The Appellant Nos.2 to 8 and Respondent Nos.4 to 566 are amongst the LPA NO.576/2013 6572 employees of the Indian and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (f...
Tag this Judgment!Mukesh Bansal Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3070/2014 MUKESH BANSAL Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Shikha Pandey, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. O.P. Saxena, APP for the State with SI Kuldeep PS Connaught Place. Mr. R.K. Handoo, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in preson. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.10618-19/2014 (for exemption) Exemptions, as prayed for, are allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The applications stand disposed off. CRL.M.C. 3070/2014 This petition has been moved by Mukesh Bansal under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying that FIR No.92/2004 registered at Police Station Connaught Place, New Delhi under Sections 420/468/471 IPC, and the proceedings emanating therefrom, including the charge framed by the Trial Court against the petitioner under Section 465/408 IPC on 12 th November, 2013, be quashed. Issue notice. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Additional Public P...
Tag this Judgment!Mridula Sharma Vs. the Registrar General, Delhi High Court
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :16. 07.2014 + W.P.(C) 4306/2014, C.M. No.8647/2014 (for exemption) MRIDULA SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through : Dr. N. Pradeep Sharma and Ms. Shruti Tiwari, Advocates. versus THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, DELHI HIGH COURT ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Syed. A. Saud, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % C.M. No.8647/2014 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4306/2014 1. The petitioner claims a direction to the respondent the Delhi High Court to set-aside the results of the examination conducted in January 2013 for the post of Administrative Officer (Judicial)/Court Master (hereafter referred to as the AO(J)/C.M. 2. Briefly the facts are that the Delhi High Court administration had called for applications from in-house candidates eligible to appear W.P.(C) 4306/2014 Page 1 in the test to fill the post of AO(J)/C.M. The pet...
Tag this Judgment!