Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 6 of about 1,089 results (0.019 seconds)Rameshwar Singh and Anr. Vs. Delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.6154/2012 RAMESHWAR SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. Versus DELHI JAL BOARD Represented by: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek setting aside the award and order dated 31.01.2009, whereby the claims for regularization of the petitioners have been rejected.2. The service particulars of the petitioners are as under:- Sl. No.1. Name & Date of Designation Place of Fathers Name Apptt. posting Shri Rameshwar 01.04.1982 Chlorinator Booster Singh Operator Pumping S/o Shri Jhari Lal Station, Singh Mayapuri 2.3. Shri Gopaljee 01.12.1981 S/o Shri Jhari Lal Singh Chlorinator Operator Pumping Station, Mayapuri Case of the petitioners before the learned Tribunal was that the petitioners were being treated as monthly paid/muster roll workers and...
Tag this Judgment!Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd Vs. Director Contract (Union ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h December, 2014. % + O.M.P. 1641/2014 & I.A. No.26253/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR CONTRACT (UNION OF INDIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1642/2014 & I.A. No.26254/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECT PHASE-II, ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1643/2014 & I.A. No.26255/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sh...
Tag this Judgment!Shenzen Oneplus Technology Co Ltd Vs. Micromax Informatics Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 24, 2014 + FAO(OS) 540/2014 SHENZEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Amisha Nagarajan, Mr.Nischal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates versus MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra, Ms.Jyoti Pawar and Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Ashwani Mata, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.M.S.Ananth, Mr.A.Banarjee and Mr.Raghav Kapoor, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We shall be referring to the parties as under:- (a) Micromax Informatics Ltd. (The Plaintiff) : Micromax (b) Shenzhen OnePlus Technology Co.Ltd. (Defendant No.1) (c) : OnePlus Cyanogen Inc. and CyanogenMod LLC (Defendants No.2 &3) FAO (OS) No.540/2014 2. Micromax is the protagonist and OnePlus is the a...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 24, 2014 + WP (C) No.11736 of 2006 RAKESH KUMAR SINGH ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender K. Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 08.08.2002, which rejected his statutory petition and his dismissal from service by the order dated 27.02.2001.2. The case of the petitioner is that while discharging his duties as a Constable in BSF, he was allegedly found asleep on duty at 23:35 hours on 12.08.2000; because of such dereliction in duty, he was tried by the Summary Security Force Court (for short SSFC) and was found guilty of the charge under Section 16(c) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act)...
Tag this Judgment!Manik Shekh Vs. The State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h December, 2014 + CRL.A. 1549/2013 & Crl. MB101032014 MANIK SHEKH Through: ..... Appellant Mr Sunil Tiwari, Advocate versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Deepak, Police Station Narela CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in this appeal under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure is to the judgment and order on sentence dated 24.10.2013 passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS, Rohini Courts whereby the appellantManik Shekh was convicted under Section 20 (b)(ii)(b) of NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three (3) years and six(6) months and fine of Rs.60,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was given to the appellant.2. The factual matrix as has been undraped by the prosecution is that on 20.03.2012, SI Manoj Kumar re...
Tag this Judgment!Bihar Sugar Mills Assn. and Ors. Vs. Uoi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA6092003 Reserved on:16. 12.2014 Pronounced on:24. 12.2014 BIHAR SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION & OTHERS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Mr. Praveen Kumar and Ms. Punam Singh, Advocates Versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Standing Counsel for UOI with Mr. Ajay Kalra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. TEJI JUDGMENT : MS.G.ROHINI, CHIEF JUSTICE1 This appeal is preferred against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 08.05.2003 in W.P.(C) No.2638/2002.2. Aggrieved by the levy sugar price fixed for the sugar season 1974-75 vide notification dated 13.04.1999, the appellants/petitioners filed W.P.(C) No.2638/2002 with a prayer to quash the said notification as well as the decision of the Government of India, Department of Food and Public Distribution vide letter dated 19.12.2001 thereby rejecting the request of the petitioner No.1 t...
Tag this Judgment!Col. S.J. Chaudhri Vs. Vantage Construction Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. 12.2014 Pronounced on:24. 12.2014 + REV.PET.474/2012 IN CS(OS) 1286/1990 COL. S. J.CHAUDHRI ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Abhimanyu Mahajan and Sh. Milan Deep Singh, Advocate. Versus VANTAGE CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Prashant Bhushan with Sh. Rohit Kumar Singh, Advocates. Sh. N.S. Vashisht, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. This judgment will dispose of a review petition preferred by the plaintiff in CS(OS) 1286 of 1990; the review petitioner is hereafter referred to as the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks review on a limited issue in respect of the judgment dated 02.07.2012 passed in CS(OS) 1286 of 1990.2. Briefly, the facts are that the plaintiff owns 20-A, Friends Colony, New Delhi and had entered into an Agreement on 23.04.1987 with the first defendant (referred to as the Builder - a term which also e...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Ashok Sen Gupta and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24.12.2014 + MAC.APP. 1150/2014 & CM No.20819/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus ASHOK SEN GUPTA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 4.9.2014. The brief facts are that on 16.7.2008 the respondent No.1 alongwith his friend Pankaj Beri reached Pankha Road, Janakapuri. There he was hit from the backside by an RTV bus said to be driven in a rash and negligent manner. Respondent No.1 suffered injuries and was hospitalised.2. The controversy centres around the compensation awarded to respondent No.1 by the Tribunal. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal awarded the following compensation:Treatment expenses Rs.51,236/- Pain and sufferings Rs.1,00,000/- Conveyance, attendant charges and special diet Loss of future earning cap...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Afzal Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1367 of 2010 Reserved on: December 19, 2014 Decision on: December 24, 2014 MOHD. AFZAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna and Mr. Rajat Katyal, APPs with SI G.D. Joshi, Special Cell. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGEMENT2412.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 22nd September 2010 passed by the learned Special Judge, NDPS in SC No.38 of 2008 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS) and the order on sentence dated 23rd September 2010 sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for ten years with fine of Rs.1 lakh and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for six months.2. The case of the prosecution is that on 23rd December 2006, SubInspector (SI) A.K. Singh of Special Cell (PW-5) received a secret information that the Appellant...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Vs. The State (Govt. of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.765 of 2008 Reserved on: December 15, 2014 Decision on: December 24, 2014 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Verma, Advocate. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2412.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 5 th August 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.3 of 2006 holding the Appellant guilty of the offences under Sections 394/454 IPC and the order on sentence dated 22nd August 2008 whereby he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 7 years and fine of Rs.10,000 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for 3 months for the offence under Section 394 IPC and RI for 2 years and fine of Rs.1,000 and in default to undergo SI for 15 days for the offence under Section 454 IPC. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. The case of the prosecution 2. The case of the prosecution...
Tag this Judgment!