Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 5 of about 1,089 results (0.026 seconds)Sh. Vijay Kumar Dahiya and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 11.2014 Pronounced on:24. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 1989/2014, C.M. NO.4155/2014 SH. VIJAY KUMAR DAHIYA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Ms. Kritika Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC along with Sh. C.M. Manaktala, Advocates, for UOI. + W.P.(C) 2001/2014, C.M. NO.4179/2014 SH. MANJEET SHARMA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. P.P. Khurana, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kewal Singh Ahuja and Ms. Prarthana Sampath, Advocates, for petitioner nos. 1 to 6, 8 to 28 and 30 to 54. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC along with Sh. C.M. Manaktala, Advocates, for UOI. + W.P.(C) 2013/2014, C.M. NO.4200/2014 GOVT. OF INDIA PRESS EMPLOYEES UNION ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Ms. Kritika Sharma, Advocates. W.P.(C) 1989/14, 2001/2014, 2013/2014, 3410/14, 3745/14 & 4...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd. Vs. Director General, M ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h December, 2014. % + O.M.P. 1641/2014 & I.A. No.26253/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR CONTRACT (UNION OF INDIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1642/2014 & I.A. No.26254/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECT PHASE-II, ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1643/2014 & I.A. No.26255/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sh...
Tag this Judgment!v K Gupta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on :24. 12.2014. CRL.REV.P. 558/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14160/2014 V K GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with SI Suresh Chand, PS EOW CRL.REV.P. 559/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14163/2014 YOGENDRA PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with SI Suresh Chand, PS EOW + CRL.REV.P. 560/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14166/2014 PANKAJ GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with SI Suresh Chand, PS EOW CRL.REV.P. 562/2014, Crl.M.A.No.14175/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14176/2014 PRAVEEN CHOWDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respon...
Tag this Judgment!Rajan Bhagat Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:24. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 3626/2014 RAJAN BHAGAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruva Bhagat with Ms. Amita Kalkal and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. versus UNIN OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC on behalf of UOI with Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of respondents.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 1.5.2014 whereby his application i.e. OA No.1148/2012 was rejected. The petitioner had claimed quashing of a communication dated 26.12.2011 rejecting his request for assignment of seniority on the basis of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Harish Chander Bhatia, 1995 (2) SCC48w.e.f. 10.10.194 when he was appointed on ad hoc...
Tag this Judgment!Anupama Gupta and Ors Vs. Kuldeep Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 24, 2014 + RFA(OS) 152/2014 ANUPAMA GUPTA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan & Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocates, with Mr.Rohit Bharadwaj & Ms.Bhabna Das, Advocates versus KULDEEP SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashok Mahajan, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.The difficulties of a litigant in India begin when he has obtained a Decree observed the Privy Council1 142 years ago in the year 1872. The state of affairs are true even as of today as the facts of the present case would amply demonstrate. 1 General Manager of the Raj Durbhunga under the Court of Wards v. Maharajah Coomar Ramaput Sing, 14 MIA6051. The dispute between the parties relates to property being Bungalow No.9, admeasuring 867 sq. yards in Sunder Nagar, New Delhi which is regarded as a tony col...
Tag this Judgment!State (Nct of Delhi) Vs. Parwati @ Kanta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2014 + CRL.A.1685/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus PARWATI @ KANTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1123/2014 KAMLESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate with Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for R-4 Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1133/2014 PARWATI @ KANTA Represented by: CRL.A.No.1685/2014 & conn.matters ..... Appellant with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI...
Tag this Judgment!British Scaffolding (I) Ltd. Vs. Interarch Building Products (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:30. 09.2014 Judgment delivered on:24. 12.2014 + OMP2612013 BRITISH SCAFFOLDING (I) LTD. ..... PETITIONER Versus INTERARCH BUILDING PRODUCTS (P) LTD. ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms. Sarika Goel and Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Karan Bharihoke and Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition seeking to challenge award dated 01.11.2012. The petition is preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act).2. Before me, the only ground on which the award was assailed was that, the work order dated 06.12.2004 (in short, work order) required the respondent to supply material and consequently erect a pre-fabricated structure (i.e., the building) having a total weight / tonnage of 302.5 MTs, whereas what was put up had a weight / tonnage of on...
Tag this Judgment!Parwati @ Kanta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2014 + CRL.A.1685/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus PARWATI @ KANTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1123/2014 KAMLESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate with Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for R-4 Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1133/2014 PARWATI @ KANTA Represented by: CRL.A.No.1685/2014 & conn.matters ..... Appellant with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI...
Tag this Judgment!Jagjit Singh Oberoi Vs. Ranjeet Kaur and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1569/2008 JAGJIT SINGH OBEROI Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sanjeev Singh, Adv. versus RANJEET KAUR & ANR Through ..... Defendants Mr.Mukul Sharma, Adv. for D-1. Mr.Rahul Sharma, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of property bearing No.I-34, Jangpura Extn., New Delhi110014 (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property") built up on a plot of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards.2. The plaintiff is an individual who is residing at 1/64, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi-110014. Defendants namely, Ranjit Kaur and Abnash Kaur are the co-owners of the suit property. Defendant No.1 is the daughter of defendant No.2.3. The defendant No.1 had entered into an agreement to sell dated 18th March, 2007 with the plaintiff for selling of basem...
Tag this Judgment!Rameshwar Singh and Anr. Vs. Delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.6154/2012 RAMESHWAR SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. Versus DELHI JAL BOARD Represented by: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek setting aside the award and order dated 31.01.2009, whereby the claims for regularization of the petitioners have been rejected.2. The service particulars of the petitioners are as under:- Sl. No.1. Name & Date of Designation Place of Fathers Name Apptt. posting Shri Rameshwar 01.04.1982 Chlorinator Booster Singh Operator Pumping S/o Shri Jhari Lal Station, Singh Mayapuri 2.3. Shri Gopaljee 01.12.1981 S/o Shri Jhari Lal Singh Chlorinator Operator Pumping Station, Mayapuri Case of the petitioners before the learned Tribunal was that the petitioners were being treated as monthly paid/muster roll workers and...
Tag this Judgment!