Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 8 of about 1,089 results (0.040 seconds)Amit Alias Pandya Vs. State
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1259 of 2014 Reserved on:19. h December 2014 Decision on:23. d December 2014 AMIT alias PANDYA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Aggarwal, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP with S.I. Mukesh Kumar, P.S. Civil Lines. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2312.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment dated 25th July, 2014 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in S.C. No.136/11 convicting the Appellant for the offences under Section 307 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Arms Act) and the order on sentence dated 31st July 2014, sentencing him to undergo 5 years rigorous imprisonment (RI) and fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo six months simple imprisonment (SI) for the offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act and 7 years RI and fine of Rs. 30,000/- and in default to undergo SI for six months for the offence under Section 307 IPC. Both the sentences were directe...
Tag this Judgment!N.N. Ojha Vs. Prem Mehra
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:01. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on:23. 12.2014 % + OMP5862013 N.N. OJHA ..... Petitioner Versus PREM MEHRA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr Puneet Aggarwal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr Abhijat & Mr Rishabh Bansal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), whereby an injunction is sought against the respondent. The injunction sought is that the respondent ought to be restrained from creating third party interest and/or disposing of, selling or mortgaging the immovable property situate in revenue village of Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi, forming part of Khasra No.1103, admeasuring 85 bighas (hereafter referred to as the property in issue).2. Notice in this petition was issued on 03.06.2013. The notice was made returnable on 10.06.2013. Despite ser...
Tag this Judgment!Medical Council of India Vs. Muzaffarnagar Medical College and Ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 % + LPA No.788/2014 MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA .. Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Manan Khera & Mr. Vishu Agrawal, Advs. Versus MUZAFFARNAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & ORS... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aseem Mehrotra, Adv. for R-1&2. Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Chaudhary & Ms. Medha Arya, Advs. for R-3 / UOI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 29th October, 2014 of the learned Single Judge of this Court allowing W.P.(C) No.7339/2014 filed by the respondents No.1 and 2 i.e. Muzaffarnagar Medical College (MMC) and its Chairman Sh. Satish C. Goel and impleading the respondent No.3 Union of India (UOI) only as the respondent thereto and by setting aside the letter dated 22nd July, 2014 of the respondent No.3 UOI,...
Tag this Judgment!Mohd. Anulludin Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :4. h December, 2014 Pronounced on :23rd December, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1241/2011 MOHD. ANULLUDIN Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 10.05.2011 and order on sentence dated 04.07.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.64/2009 convicting the Appellant for committing the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 10 years and to pay fine of ` 50,000/- and in default of fine to further undergo SI for six months.2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on 4.4.2009, the complainant Smt. Shabina Begum left home to buy vegetables leaving behind her 8 years old daughter and 4 years old son. When she returned from the vegetable market, she f...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Zenith Infotech Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on December 11, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 23, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3437/2014 M/S. ZENITH INFOTECH LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ajay J.Jain, Mr.Atanu Mukherjee & Mr.Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Srivats Kaushal and Ms.Kritika Mehra, Advocates for R1-Union of India Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manpreet Lamba & Mr.Divij Kishore, Advocates for Bank of New York and Mellon (BNYM) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. A short and an interesting question falls for our consideration in this writ petition, which is, whether, the Registrar, Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR, in short) could have declined the reference of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner company is not carrying on any manufacturing activity, while scrutinizing the refere...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. M/S D.C.M. Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.35/2002 Reserved on:8. h September, 2014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-IV.. Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S D.C.M. LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.P. Gupta & Mr. Anunav Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.: This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) stands admitted for adjudication on the following substantial question of law:Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that there was no transfer within the meaning of S.32A(5) of the Act under the Scheme of Arrangement of the assessee company and, therefore, the Assessing Officer erred in withdrawing the investment allowance granted earlier under Section 155 (4A) of the Act?. 2. The respondent-assessee is a company and during the per...
Tag this Judgment!Anand Decors Vs. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ST. APPL. 35/2014 Reserved on:18. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:23. d December, 2014 % ANAND DECORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ramanand Roy, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. ST.APPL. 37/2014 PRINT-N- WRAP Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ramanand Roy, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE &TAXES,DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Adv. ST.APPL. 38/2014 DIWAN SAHEB FASHINS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.H.L.Taneja, Adv. with Mr.Sunil,Adv Versus THE COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Adv. ST.APPL. 41/2014 AL-PACK INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ramanand Roy, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF. TRADE & TAXES, DELHI..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. ST.APPL....
Tag this Judgment!Make My Trip(India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Make My Tours Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:23. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 4039/2014 MAKE MY TRIP(INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Prashant Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Kanishk Kumar, Adv. versus MAKE MY TOURS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.26297/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing true typed copies of documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to said documents being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.4039/2014 Let the plaint be registered as a suit. Issue summons to the defendants through all modes of service including e-mail in addition, returnable on 13th February, 2015. I.A. No.26296/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. Issue notice to the defendants, returnable on 13th February, 2015.2. Plaintiff has filed...
Tag this Judgment!Punam Laul and Anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 6947/2014 & CM163572014 PUNAM LAUL & ANR .... Petitioners versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent No.1&2 For the Respondent No.3 : Mr B.S. Maan with Mr Vishal Maan : Mr Yeeshu Jain with Ms Jyoti Tyagi : Mr Manu Mridul with Mr Rajat Agnihotri & Ms Ragini. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The counter affidavit handed over on behalf of respondent nos. 1&2 by Mr Yeeshu Jain is taken on record. The learned counsel for the petitioners does not wish to file any rejoinder affidavit in view of the averments contained in the writ petition.2. The petitioners seek the benefit of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 201...
Tag this Judgment!State (Govt of Nct Delhi) Vs. Banti and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-218 & 218A + CRL.A. 1124 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Dudeja and Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar, Advocates for A-1 Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Amicus Curiae for A-2 versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP WITH CRL.A. 71 of 2012 STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP versus BANTI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Amicus Curiae for R-1. Mr. Rakesh Dudeja and Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2312.2014 1. Criminal Appeal (Crl. A.) No.1124 of 2010 is by Ajay Kumar (Appellant No.1) (Accused No.2) and Banti (Appellant No.2) (Accused No.1) against the judgment dated 28th July 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.139 of 2007 convicting both the Appellants for the offences under Sections 323/341 and 363/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 4th August 2010...
Tag this Judgment!