Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 11 of about 1,089 results (0.043 seconds)Mohd. Anulludin Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :4. h December, 2014 Pronounced on :23rd December, 2014 % + CRL.A. 1241/2011 MOHD. ANULLUDIN Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Neeraj Kumar Singh, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 10.05.2011 and order on sentence dated 04.07.2011 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.64/2009 convicting the Appellant for committing the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 10 years and to pay fine of ` 50,000/- and in default of fine to further undergo SI for six months.2. The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on 4.4.2009, the complainant Smt. Shabina Begum left home to buy vegetables leaving behind her 8 years old daughter and 4 years old son. When she returned from the vegetable market, she f...
Tag this Judgment!Jagan Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.817 of 2008 Reserved on: December 15, 2014 Decision on: December 23, 2014 JAGAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dharmendra Vashishtha and Mr. Sumit Kalra, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2312.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11th September 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.18 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 307 IPC and the order on sentence dated 15th September 2008 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 3 years and fine of Rs. 21,000 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months. The unfolding of events 2. The case of the prosecution is that SI Ramanand (PW-6) was posted at Police Station (PS) Sangam Vihar on 9th October 2005 on emergency duty. On that day, he received DD No.14B (Ex.PW-6/A) in which it was stated th...
Tag this Judgment!Praleen Chopra Vs. M/S Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:23. 12.2014 W.P.(C) 8963/2014 PRALEEN CHOPRA ..... Petitioner versus M/S DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION PVT. LTD. & ORS ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr Arjun Singh Bawa with Mr Ritin Rai. For the Respondents : CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J (ORAL) CM210512014 As the matter has been taken up for hearing, the early hearing application is infructuous and is disposed of. CM210522014 For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. CM204942014 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 8963/2014 & CM No.20495/2014 1. The petitioner impugns an order dated 26.09.2014 passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (West), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi under Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereafter the Act) whereby a recei...
Tag this Judgment!State (Govt of Nct Delhi) Vs. Banti and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-218 & 218A + CRL.A. 1124 of 2010 AJAY KUMAR & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rakesh Dudeja and Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar, Advocates for A-1 Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Amicus Curiae for A-2 versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP WITH CRL.A. 71 of 2012 STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP versus BANTI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Amicus Curiae for R-1. Mr. Rakesh Dudeja and Mr. Raj Kumar Tomar, Advocates for R-2 CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % ORDER2312.2014 1. Criminal Appeal (Crl. A.) No.1124 of 2010 is by Ajay Kumar (Appellant No.1) (Accused No.2) and Banti (Appellant No.2) (Accused No.1) against the judgment dated 28th July 2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in SC No.139 of 2007 convicting both the Appellants for the offences under Sections 323/341 and 363/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the order on sentence dated 4th August 2010...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Zenith Infotech Ltd. Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on December 11, 2014 Judgment delivered on December 23, 2014 + W.P.(C) 3437/2014 M/S. ZENITH INFOTECH LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Dr.Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ajay J.Jain, Mr.Atanu Mukherjee & Mr.Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Srivats Kaushal and Ms.Kritika Mehra, Advocates for R1-Union of India Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Manpreet Lamba & Mr.Divij Kishore, Advocates for Bank of New York and Mellon (BNYM) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. A short and an interesting question falls for our consideration in this writ petition, which is, whether, the Registrar, Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR, in short) could have declined the reference of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner company is not carrying on any manufacturing activity, while scrutinizing the refere...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-Iv Vs. M/S D.C.M. Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.35/2002 Reserved on:8. h September, 2014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-IV.. Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus M/S D.C.M. LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V.P. Gupta & Mr. Anunav Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.: This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) stands admitted for adjudication on the following substantial question of law:Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that there was no transfer within the meaning of S.32A(5) of the Act under the Scheme of Arrangement of the assessee company and, therefore, the Assessing Officer erred in withdrawing the investment allowance granted earlier under Section 155 (4A) of the Act?. 2. The respondent-assessee is a company and during the per...
Tag this Judgment!Fight for Human Rights Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.8201/2014 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through: Mr. K.R. Chitra, Adv. .... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Adv. for R-1. Mr. T. Singhdev with Mr. Manan Khera, Advs. for R-2 MCI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs against the respondent no.1 Union of India and the respondent no.2 Medical Council of India:(a) Direct respondent no.1 to make available medical treatment to the general public at reasonable cost. (b) W.P.(C) No.8201/2014 Direct respondent no.1 to make easily available medicines by their generic names by opening Jan Aushodhi Stores on a large scale throughout the territory of India and give systematic, regular publicity regarding the low prices of unbranded the Jan Aushodhi Stores and ensure regul...
Tag this Judgment!N.N. Ojha Vs. Prem Mehra
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on:01. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on:23. 12.2014 % + OMP5862013 N.N. OJHA ..... Petitioner Versus PREM MEHRA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr Puneet Aggarwal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr Abhijat & Mr Rishabh Bansal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act), whereby an injunction is sought against the respondent. The injunction sought is that the respondent ought to be restrained from creating third party interest and/or disposing of, selling or mortgaging the immovable property situate in revenue village of Satbari, Mehrauli, New Delhi, forming part of Khasra No.1103, admeasuring 85 bighas (hereafter referred to as the property in issue).2. Notice in this petition was issued on 03.06.2013. The notice was made returnable on 10.06.2013. Despite ser...
Tag this Judgment!Anand Decors Vs. Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, New Delhi
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ST. APPL. 35/2014 Reserved on:18. h December, 2014 Date of Decision:23. d December, 2014 % ANAND DECORS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ramanand Roy, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. ST.APPL. 37/2014 PRINT-N- WRAP Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ramanand Roy, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE &TAXES,DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Adv. ST.APPL. 38/2014 DIWAN SAHEB FASHINS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.H.L.Taneja, Adv. with Mr.Sunil,Adv Versus THE COMMISSIONER TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Latika Chaudhary, Adv. ST.APPL. 41/2014 AL-PACK INDUSTRIES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ruchir Bhatia and Mr. Ramanand Roy, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF. TRADE & TAXES, DELHI..... Respondent Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate. ST.APPL....
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs. Mradul Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RC.Rev. No.376/2014 23rd December , 2014 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mrs. Mini Pushkarna, Standing counsel for NDMC. VERSUS MRADUL CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.19278/2014 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.19279/2014 (delay of 22 days in refiling) Delay in refiling is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RC.Rev. No.376/2014 & CM No.19277/2014 (stay) & CM No.20344/2014 (for taking on record the additional affidavit) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the petitioner/tenant impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 30.4.2014 by which the A...
Tag this Judgment!