Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 4 of about 1,089 results (0.022 seconds)Indo Soviet Medical Education Care and Research Foun Vs. Anju Jain and ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:15. 12.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:24. 12.2014 % + RFA (OS) 68/2011 INDO SOVIET MEDICAL EDUCATION CARE & RESEARCH FOUNDATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Singh, Advocate. versus ANJU JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Bahl and Ms. Leena Tuteja, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present appeal is directed against a limited portion of the common judgment and order dated 06.12.2010 of a learned single judge, disposing off two suits, i.e. CS (OS) 2105/1994, and CS (OS) 260/1994. The first suit was instituted by the Appellant and the second, by the respondent (claiming damages). For convenience, the suit filed by the Appellant (hereafter called the Trust) would be referred to as the the recovery suit and the other suit, filed by the respondent, (hereafter the Jains) would be referred to as the damages suit, o...
Tag this Judgment!Amitabh Verma Vs. Sneh Lata Malhotra
Court: Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA2102014 Decided on 24th December, 2014 AMITABH VERMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. versus SNEH LATA MALHOTRA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. K.K. Bhuchar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(Oral) 1. Appellant has assailed the decree of possession dated 31 st March, 2014 passed by the trial court under Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code, for short) in respect of the suit property, that is, E-5, Ground Floor, Greater Kailash-II Enclave, New Delhi. As regards other reliefs including mesne profits, suit is still pending.2. Respondent alleged in the plaint that suit property was let out to appellant vide a registered Lease Deed dated 26th February, 2009 on a monthly rent of `14,000/-. Appellant stopped paying rent with effect from April, 2009. As on the date of filing of the suit ` 1,26,000/- was due and outstanding towards the rent. Accordingly, res...
Tag this Judgment!Anupama Gupta and Ors Vs. Kuldeep Singh and Ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 24, 2014 + RFA(OS) 152/2014 ANUPAMA GUPTA & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan & Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocates, with Mr.Rohit Bharadwaj & Ms.Bhabna Das, Advocates versus KULDEEP SINGH & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. P.S. Patwalia, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ashok Mahajan, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT % KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.The difficulties of a litigant in India begin when he has obtained a Decree observed the Privy Council1 142 years ago in the year 1872. The state of affairs are true even as of today as the facts of the present case would amply demonstrate. 1 General Manager of the Raj Durbhunga under the Court of Wards v. Maharajah Coomar Ramaput Sing, 14 MIA6051. The dispute between the parties relates to property being Bungalow No.9, admeasuring 867 sq. yards in Sunder Nagar, New Delhi which is regarded as a tony col...
Tag this Judgment!Jagjit Singh Oberoi Vs. Ranjeet Kaur and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 1569/2008 JAGJIT SINGH OBEROI Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Sanjeev Singh, Adv. versus RANJEET KAUR & ANR Through ..... Defendants Mr.Mukul Sharma, Adv. for D-1. Mr.Rahul Sharma, Adv. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) 1. The plaintiff has filed this suit for specific performance of contract and permanent injunction against the defendants in respect of property bearing No.I-34, Jangpura Extn., New Delhi110014 (hereinafter referred to as the "suit property") built up on a plot of land admeasuring 200 sq. yards.2. The plaintiff is an individual who is residing at 1/64, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi-110014. Defendants namely, Ranjit Kaur and Abnash Kaur are the co-owners of the suit property. Defendant No.1 is the daughter of defendant No.2.3. The defendant No.1 had entered into an agreement to sell dated 18th March, 2007 with the plaintiff for selling of basem...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 24, 2014 + WP (C) No.11736 of 2006 RAKESH KUMAR SINGH ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Virender K. Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge the order dated 08.08.2002, which rejected his statutory petition and his dismissal from service by the order dated 27.02.2001.2. The case of the petitioner is that while discharging his duties as a Constable in BSF, he was allegedly found asleep on duty at 23:35 hours on 12.08.2000; because of such dereliction in duty, he was tried by the Summary Security Force Court (for short SSFC) and was found guilty of the charge under Section 16(c) of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the BSF Act)...
Tag this Judgment!v K Gupta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :19. 12.2014 Judgment delivered on :24. 12.2014. CRL.REV.P. 558/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14160/2014 V K GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with SI Suresh Chand, PS EOW CRL.REV.P. 559/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14163/2014 YOGENDRA PAL SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with SI Suresh Chand, PS EOW + CRL.REV.P. 560/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14166/2014 PANKAJ GOEL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: + Ms. Fizani Husain, APP with SI Suresh Chand, PS EOW CRL.REV.P. 562/2014, Crl.M.A.No.14175/2014 & Crl.M.A.No.14176/2014 PRAVEEN CHOWDHARY Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mukesh Anand with Mr. Shailesh Tiwary, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respon...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Ashok Sen Gupta and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~A-31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24.12.2014 + MAC.APP. 1150/2014 & CM No.20819/2014 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus ASHOK SEN GUPTA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. The present appeal is filed seeking to impugn the Award dated 4.9.2014. The brief facts are that on 16.7.2008 the respondent No.1 alongwith his friend Pankaj Beri reached Pankha Road, Janakapuri. There he was hit from the backside by an RTV bus said to be driven in a rash and negligent manner. Respondent No.1 suffered injuries and was hospitalised.2. The controversy centres around the compensation awarded to respondent No.1 by the Tribunal. Based on the evidence on record the Tribunal awarded the following compensation:Treatment expenses Rs.51,236/- Pain and sufferings Rs.1,00,000/- Conveyance, attendant charges and special diet Loss of future earning cap...
Tag this Judgment!Manik Shekh Vs. The State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h December, 2014 + CRL.A. 1549/2013 & Crl. MB101032014 MANIK SHEKH Through: ..... Appellant Mr Sunil Tiwari, Advocate versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Ritu Gauba, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State along with SI Deepak, Police Station Narela CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The challenge in this appeal under Section 374 of Code of Criminal Procedure is to the judgment and order on sentence dated 24.10.2013 passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS, Rohini Courts whereby the appellantManik Shekh was convicted under Section 20 (b)(ii)(b) of NDPS Act and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three (3) years and six(6) months and fine of Rs.60,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was given to the appellant.2. The factual matrix as has been undraped by the prosecution is that on 20.03.2012, SI Manoj Kumar re...
Tag this Judgment!Syndicate Bank Vs. K. Periaswami
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4984 /2013 % Judgment delivered on:24. th December, 2014 SYNDICATE BANK Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K. Taneja, Senior Advocate with Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate. Versus K. PERIASWAMI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.L.K.Singh and Ms. Sonal Sinha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present petition is directed against the impugned award dated 12.12.2012, passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal reduced the punishment of the respondent from removal of service to the discharge simpleciter entitling him to claim retiral benefits.2. Mr.S.K.Taneja, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner Bank issued the chargesheet against the respondent/workman on the allegations as under:That you were functioning as Clerk at our Foreign Exchange Branch, Connaught Place, N...
Tag this Judgment!Amitabh Verma Vs. Sneh Lata Malhotra
Court: Delhi
$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA2102014 Decided on 24th December, 2014 AMITABH VERMA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Rajat Aneja and Ms. Rashmi Verma, Advs. versus SNEH LATA MALHOTRA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. K.K. Bhuchar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(Oral) 1. Appellant has assailed the decree of possession dated 31 st March, 2014 passed by the trial court under Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (the Code, for short) in respect of the suit property, that is, E-5, Ground Floor, Greater Kailash-II Enclave, New Delhi. As regards other reliefs including mesne profits, suit is still pending.2. Respondent alleged in the plaint that suit property was let out to appellant vide a registered Lease Deed dated 26th February, 2009 on a monthly rent of `14,000/-. Appellant stopped paying rent with effect from April, 2009. As on the date of filing of the suit ` 1,26,000/- was due and outstanding towards the rent. Accordingly, res...
Tag this Judgment!