Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Syndicate Bank Vs. K. Periaswami
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4984 /2013 % Judgment delivered on:24. th December, 2014 SYNDICATE BANK Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.S.K. Taneja, Senior Advocate with Mr.Puneet Taneja, Advocate. Versus K. PERIASWAMI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.L.K.Singh and Ms. Sonal Sinha, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present petition is directed against the impugned award dated 12.12.2012, passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, Karkardooma Courts Complex, Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal reduced the punishment of the respondent from removal of service to the discharge simpleciter entitling him to claim retiral benefits.2. Mr.S.K.Taneja, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner Bank issued the chargesheet against the respondent/workman on the allegations as under:That you were functioning as Clerk at our Foreign Exchange Branch, Connaught Place, N...
Sh. Vijay Kumar Dahiya and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. 11.2014 Pronounced on:24. 12.2014 + W.P.(C) 1989/2014, C.M. NO.4155/2014 SH. VIJAY KUMAR DAHIYA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Ms. Kritika Sharma, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC along with Sh. C.M. Manaktala, Advocates, for UOI. + W.P.(C) 2001/2014, C.M. NO.4179/2014 SH. MANJEET SHARMA AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Sh. P.P. Khurana, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kewal Singh Ahuja and Ms. Prarthana Sampath, Advocates, for petitioner nos. 1 to 6, 8 to 28 and 30 to 54. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Sh. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC along with Sh. C.M. Manaktala, Advocates, for UOI. + W.P.(C) 2013/2014, C.M. NO.4200/2014 GOVT. OF INDIA PRESS EMPLOYEES UNION ..... Petitioner Through: Sh. K.C. Mittal, Ms. Ruchika Mittal and Ms. Kritika Sharma, Advocates. W.P.(C) 1989/14, 2001/2014, 2013/2014, 3410/14, 3745/14 & 4...
M/S Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd. Vs. Director General, M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h December, 2014. % + O.M.P. 1641/2014 & I.A. No.26253/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR CONTRACT (UNION OF INDIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1642/2014 & I.A. No.26254/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECT PHASE-II, ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1643/2014 & I.A. No.26255/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sh...
Rajan Bhagat Vs. Union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:24. 12.2014 + W.P. (C) 3626/2014 RAJAN BHAGAT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhruva Bhagat with Ms. Amita Kalkal and Ms. Aditi Gupta, Advocates. versus UNIN OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC on behalf of UOI with Mr. Deepak Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC accepts notice on behalf of respondents.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereafter referred to as CAT) dated 1.5.2014 whereby his application i.e. OA No.1148/2012 was rejected. The petitioner had claimed quashing of a communication dated 26.12.2011 rejecting his request for assignment of seniority on the basis of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India v. Harish Chander Bhatia, 1995 (2) SCC48w.e.f. 10.10.194 when he was appointed on ad hoc...
State (Nct of Delhi) Vs. Parwati @ Kanta and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2014 + CRL.A.1685/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus PARWATI @ KANTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1123/2014 KAMLESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate with Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for R-4 Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1133/2014 PARWATI @ KANTA Represented by: CRL.A.No.1685/2014 & conn.matters ..... Appellant with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI...
British Scaffolding (I) Ltd. Vs. Interarch Building Products (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:30. 09.2014 Judgment delivered on:24. 12.2014 + OMP2612013 BRITISH SCAFFOLDING (I) LTD. ..... PETITIONER Versus INTERARCH BUILDING PRODUCTS (P) LTD. ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms. Sarika Goel and Mr. Rajeev Chauhan, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Bahl, Mr. Karan Bharihoke and Mr. Eklavya Bahl, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER,J1 This is a petition seeking to challenge award dated 01.11.2012. The petition is preferred under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act).2. Before me, the only ground on which the award was assailed was that, the work order dated 06.12.2004 (in short, work order) required the respondent to supply material and consequently erect a pre-fabricated structure (i.e., the building) having a total weight / tonnage of 302.5 MTs, whereas what was put up had a weight / tonnage of on...
Parwati @ Kanta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2014 + CRL.A.1685/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus PARWATI @ KANTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1123/2014 KAMLESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate with Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for R-4 Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1133/2014 PARWATI @ KANTA Represented by: CRL.A.No.1685/2014 & conn.matters ..... Appellant with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI...
Jeepu @ Deepu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2014 + CRL.A.1685/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus PARWATI @ KANTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1123/2014 KAMLESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate with Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for R-4 Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1133/2014 PARWATI @ KANTA Represented by: CRL.A.No.1685/2014 & conn.matters ..... Appellant with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI...
Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Ltd Vs. Director Contract (Union ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h December, 2014. % + O.M.P. 1641/2014 & I.A. No.26253/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR CONTRACT (UNION OF INDIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1642/2014 & I.A. No.26254/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECT PHASE-II, ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1643/2014 & I.A. No.26255/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sh...
Rameshwar Singh and Anr. Vs. Delhi Jal Board
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-24-2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.6154/2012 RAMESHWAR SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Represented by: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal and Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocates. Versus DELHI JAL BOARD Represented by: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek setting aside the award and order dated 31.01.2009, whereby the claims for regularization of the petitioners have been rejected.2. The service particulars of the petitioners are as under:- Sl. No.1. Name & Date of Designation Place of Fathers Name Apptt. posting Shri Rameshwar 01.04.1982 Chlorinator Booster Singh Operator Pumping S/o Shri Jhari Lal Station, Singh Mayapuri 2.3. Shri Gopaljee 01.12.1981 S/o Shri Jhari Lal Singh Chlorinator Operator Pumping Station, Mayapuri Case of the petitioners before the learned Tribunal was that the petitioners were being treated as monthly paid/muster roll workers and...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »