Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 10 of about 1,089 results (0.023 seconds)Tanu Goel and Another Vs. Girish Chopra and Ors
Court: Delhi
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Cont. Cas (C) No.741/2014 Decided on :23. d December, 2014 TANU GOEL AND ANOTHER Petitioners Through: Mr. Sudhir Talwar, Advocate. Versus GIRISH CHOPRA & ORS Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) 1. By virtue of the present petition, the petitioners are claiming action for wilful disobedience of the orders dated 31.3.2011 and 6.4.2011 passed by the learned single judge in C.S. (OS) No.669/2011 titled Tanu Goel & Anr. Vs. Girish Chopra & Ors.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the petitioners filed a suit for specific performance against the respondents. Along with the suit, an application bearing No.4427/2011 under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC was filed for an ex parte ad interim injunction in respect of the third floor of property No.9, Sukhdev Vihar, New Delhi and terrace rights thereon, as it was alleged by the petitioners that the respondents had agreed to sell the same to them.3. After hearing the argum...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Tara Logitech Private Ltd. Vs. M/S Religare Finvest Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014. + OMP No.1656/2014 & IA No.26202/2014 (for stay) M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Rajat & Mr. Priyadarshi Gopal, Advs. Versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None. AND + OMP No.1657/2014 & IA No.26204/2014 (for stay) M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Rajat & Mr. Priyadarshi Gopal, Advs. Versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondent I.A. No.26203/2014 in OMP No.1656/2014 & I.A. No.26205/2014 in OMP No.1657/2014 (both for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. OMP Nos.1656/2014 & 1657/2014 3. Both these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are preferred with respect to the a...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Tara Logitech Private Ltd. Vs. M/S Religare Finvest Limited and An ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014. + OMP No.1656/2014 & IA No.26202/2014 (for stay) M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Rajat & Mr. Priyadarshi Gopal, Advs. Versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None. AND + OMP No.1657/2014 & IA No.26204/2014 (for stay) M/S TARA LOGITECH PRIVATE LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Atul Nanda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Mr. Rajat & Mr. Priyadarshi Gopal, Advs. Versus M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondent I.A. No.26203/2014 in OMP No.1656/2014 & I.A. No.26205/2014 in OMP No.1657/2014 (both for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.2. The applications are disposed of. OMP Nos.1656/2014 & 1657/2014 3. Both these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are preferred with respect to the a...
Tag this Judgment!Vincent George Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2014 Date of Decision:23. d December, 2014 % + CRL. M.C. 3371/2013 VINCENT GEORGE Through: .Petitioner Mr. Guru Krishan Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R. Sudhindere and Mr. Abhishek Prasad, Advocates. versus CBI Through: .Respondent Mr. Narender Mann, Special PP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant and Ms. Utkarsha Kohli, Advocates with IO Inspector Sushil Diwan. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 18.07.2013 and 19.07.2013 passed by learned Special Judge, CBI-03 (PC Act), Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in CC No.01/2013 arising out of RC No.4/2001/CBI/SIU-IX (EOU-VII/ New Delhi) titled as CBI vs. Vincent George whereby the petitioner was summoned for the offence punishable under Sections 13(1)(e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the facts of the case are that on 14.03.2000 on the basis o...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs. Mradul Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % RC.Rev. No.376/2014 23rd December , 2014 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mrs. Mini Pushkarna, Standing counsel for NDMC. VERSUS MRADUL CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ...... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.19278/2014 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.19279/2014 (delay of 22 days in refiling) Delay in refiling is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RC.Rev. No.376/2014 & CM No.19277/2014 (stay) & CM No.20344/2014 (for taking on record the additional affidavit) 1. This rent control revision petition is filed under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by the petitioner/tenant impugning the judgment of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 30.4.2014 by which the A...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Ii Vs. Home Developers Pvt.Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA8032014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) II ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus HOME DEVELOPERS PVT.LTD. Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This appeal filed by the Revenue pertains to assessment year 2004-05 and impugns the findings recorded by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in their order dated 21 st September, 2012.2. The appeal, it appears, was filed within time, but returned under office objection and there is a prolonged delay of 650 days in re-filing of the appeal. However, before issuing notice on the application for condonation of delay, we deem it appropriate to examine the grounds of appeal on merits.3. ITA8032014 were subject to search and seizure operations under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (...
Tag this Judgment!the Commissioner of Income Tax-Ii Vs. M/S Johnson Matthey India P. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
$~11. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.757/2014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan & Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocates. versus M/S JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA P. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vikas Srivastava & Ms. Varsha Bhattacharya, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): CM No.20423/2014 Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-assessee on advance notice states that he has no objection in case delay in re-filing of 395 days is condoned. The application is allowed in view of the said statement. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.757/2014 This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) impugns order dated 31st August, 2012 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) affirming the finding of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the Assessing Officer was not justifi...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax - 15 (Erstwhile Cit-Ix) Vs. Shri Chintoo To ...
Court: Delhi
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.790/2014 Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 15 (ERSTWHILE CIT-IX) ..... Appellant Through Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal, Sr. Standing Counsel, Mr. Aamir Aziz & Mr. Shashank Menon, Advocates. versus SHRI CHINTOO TOMAR Through Nemo. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The present appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) arises out of proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer by issue of notice under Section 148 of the Act recording the following reasons:Assessment of Chintoo Tomar for the A.Y. 2007-08 was completed in summary at an income of Rs.1,99,613/-. It apparent from the records that the during the financial year 2006-07, the assessee has earned capital gain of Rs.2,69,47,709/- out of which Rs.2,55,56885/- was claimed exempted u/s 54 by investing in residenti...
Tag this Judgment!Siksha Sewa Samiti and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014. + W.P.(C) 3687/2008 & CM No.5230/2014 (for directions) SIKSHA SEWA SAMITI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad and Mr. Shaikh Chand, Advs. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal and Mr. Hem Kumar, Advs. for GNCTD. Ms. Mahika Trivedi, Adv. for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the three petitioners claiming to be Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) working for the promotion of Urdu, Urdu education and general education, pleading: (i) that there are 65 Urdu Primary Schools in Delhi run by Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD); (ii) that after the students pass Class V from such Schools, they are sent to such Schools where there is no provision for reading through the Urdu medium; the students thus face ...
Tag this Judgment!Make My Trip(India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Make My Tours Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:23. d December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 4039/2014 MAKE MY TRIP(INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Prashant Gupta, Adv. with Mr.Kanishk Kumar, Adv. versus MAKE MY TOURS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through None. ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(Oral) I.A. No.26297/2014 This is an application filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 CPC seeking exemption from filing true typed copies of documents. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed, subject to said documents being produced at the time of admission/denial of the documents. The application is disposed of. CS(OS) No.4039/2014 Let the plaint be registered as a suit. Issue summons to the defendants through all modes of service including e-mail in addition, returnable on 13th February, 2015. I.A. No.26296/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. Issue notice to the defendants, returnable on 13th February, 2015.2. Plaintiff has filed...
Tag this Judgment!