Delhi Court December 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 7 of about 1,089 results (0.025 seconds)Amit Mukhopadhyay Vs. Delhi Development Authority and Ors.
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:- 24th December, 2014 % + WP(C) No.7040/2014 AMIT MUKHOPADHYAY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rabindra Singh, Adv. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. for respondent no.1 DDA. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 The petition impugns Regulation 7 of the Delhi Development Authority (Management and Disposal of Housing Estates) Regulations 1968 and subclauses (iii) and (vii) and the eligibility clause / criteria (2) of the DDA Housing Scheme, 2014 and seeks certain other directions with respect to the said scheme and also cancellation of the allotment obtained by the respondents No.2 and 3 namely Shri Budh Raj and Mrs. Kiran Raj, w/o Shri Budh Raj from the respondent No.1 Delhi Development Authority (DDA) in violation of the Rules and Regulations of DDA.2. It is the case of the petitioner i) that the respondent no.1 DDA has ...
Tag this Judgment!Thomas Cook (India) Limited Vs. Mohit Jain and Anr.
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1690/2011 Judgment delivered on:24. h December,2014 % THOMAS COOK (INDIA) LIMITED ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Alok Bhasin and Ms. Poonam Das, Advs. versus MOHIT JAIN & ANR. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Vikas Arora and Mr. Akshat Rehani, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing and setting the impugned award dated 15.02.2010, passed by the Labour Court in I.D. No.111/2000, whereby the learned Labour Court directed the petitioner to pay compensation in the form of lump sum amount of Rs. 3 lac (Rupees Three Lakhs) towards all the claims of the respondent/workman.2. Mr. Alok Bhasin, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the respondent was appointed as a trainee on 09.07.1997 for a fixed term of one year. Thereafter, he was appointed as an Executive, Foreign Exchange and was posted at Hotel Imperial Branch on 2...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Omaxe Infrastructure and Construction Pvt. Ltd Vs. Union of India, ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h December, 2014. % + O.M.P. 1641/2014 & I.A. No.26253/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR CONTRACT (UNION OF INDIA) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1642/2014 & I.A. No.26254/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Mr. Vikas Sharma, Mr. Amit Chaudhary & Ms. Risha Mittal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA, DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMMODATION PROJECT PHASE-II, ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jaswinder Singh & Mr. Saqib, Advs. AND + O.M.P. 1643/2014 & I.A. No.26255/2014 (u/O6R-17 CPC) M/S OMAXE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sandeep Sh...
Tag this Judgment!National Thermal Power Corporation Limited Vs. Regional Provident Fund ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + W.P. (C) No.691/2011 NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. R.R. Kumar, Adv. versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER-II ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Shivanath Mahanta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions for quashing the impugned orders dated 30.11.2006 and 01.11.2010 passed by Original Authority and Appellate Authority whereby the petitioner Establishment has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.68,616/- as penal damages under Section 14B and penal interest a sum of Rs.8,09,593/payable under Section 7Q of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short the Act).2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the respondent issued scheme in the year 1996 w.e.f. November, 1995 that the Establishment shall deposi...
Tag this Judgment!Kamlesh Vs. Sanjay and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2014 + CRL.A.1685/2014 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Represented by: ..... Appellant Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus PARWATI @ KANTA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1123/2014 KAMLESH Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Deepak Anand, Advocate with Ms.Hemlata Rawat and Mr.Sujit Kumar Singh, Advocates for R-1, R-2 and R-3 Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for R-4 Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI Sachin Kumar, PS Karawal Nagar versus SANJAY & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.Shailender Dahiya, Advocate with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate CRL.A.1133/2014 PARWATI @ KANTA Represented by: CRL.A.No.1685/2014 & conn.matters ..... Appellant with Mr.Pradeep Ahlawat, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP Insp.J.S.Mehta, SHO and SI...
Tag this Judgment!Indo Soviet Medical Education Care and Research Foun Vs. Anju Jain and ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:15. 12.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:24. 12.2014 % + RFA (OS) 68/2011 INDO SOVIET MEDICAL EDUCATION CARE & RESEARCH FOUNDATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. L.K. Singh, Advocate. versus ANJU JAIN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Gaurav Bahl and Ms. Leena Tuteja, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present appeal is directed against a limited portion of the common judgment and order dated 06.12.2010 of a learned single judge, disposing off two suits, i.e. CS (OS) 2105/1994, and CS (OS) 260/1994. The first suit was instituted by the Appellant and the second, by the respondent (claiming damages). For convenience, the suit filed by the Appellant (hereafter called the Trust) would be referred to as the the recovery suit and the other suit, filed by the respondent, (hereafter the Jains) would be referred to as the damages suit, o...
Tag this Judgment!Anand Shekhar Singh Vs. M/S Apco Constrution Pvt Ltd and Anr
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:24. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3381/2012 ANAND SHEKHAR SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Manoj Singh, Adv. with Mr.Manu Dev Sharma, Adv. versus M/S APCO CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Vishwa Bhushan Arya, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. This is a suit for recovery filed by the plaintiff against the defendants under Order XXXVII CPC for a sum of Rs.22,00,000/alongwith pendent-lite interest.2. Brief facts of the case as stated in the plaint are that the defendant No.1, through defendants No.2 to 4 who are the Managing Director and Directors of defendant No.1, approached the plaintiff in November, 2008 and made a request for a financial loan of Rs.22,00,000/- for expansion of business to which the plaintiff agreed. The said loan was advanced to defendant No.1 through defendants No.2 to 4 for a period of 24 months w.e.f. November, 2008 by means of Cheques which were duly ...
Tag this Judgment!Siksha Sewa Samiti and Ors. Vs. State of Nct of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014. + W.P.(C) 3687/2008 & CM No.5230/2014 (for directions) SIKSHA SEWA SAMITI & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad and Mr. Shaikh Chand, Advs. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal and Mr. Hem Kumar, Advs. for GNCTD. Ms. Mahika Trivedi, Adv. for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the three petitioners claiming to be Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) working for the promotion of Urdu, Urdu education and general education, pleading: (i) that there are 65 Urdu Primary Schools in Delhi run by Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD); (ii) that after the students pass Class V from such Schools, they are sent to such Schools where there is no provision for reading through the Urdu medium; the students thus face ...
Tag this Judgment!Jagan Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. No.817 of 2008 Reserved on: December 15, 2014 Decision on: December 23, 2014 JAGAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dharmendra Vashishtha and Mr. Sumit Kalra, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Isha Khanna, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT2312.2014 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11th September 2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in SC No.18 of 2006 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 307 IPC and the order on sentence dated 15th September 2008 whereby the Appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for 3 years and fine of Rs. 21,000 and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for 6 months. The unfolding of events 2. The case of the prosecution is that SI Ramanand (PW-6) was posted at Police Station (PS) Sangam Vihar on 9th October 2005 on emergency duty. On that day, he received DD No.14B (Ex.PW-6/A) in which it was stated th...
Tag this Judgment!Fight for Human Rights Vs. Union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d December, 2014 % + W.P.(C) No.8201/2014 FIGHT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Through: Mr. K.R. Chitra, Adv. .... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, Adv. for R-1. Mr. T. Singhdev with Mr. Manan Khera, Advs. for R-2 MCI. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J1 This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks the following reliefs against the respondent no.1 Union of India and the respondent no.2 Medical Council of India:(a) Direct respondent no.1 to make available medical treatment to the general public at reasonable cost. (b) W.P.(C) No.8201/2014 Direct respondent no.1 to make easily available medicines by their generic names by opening Jan Aushodhi Stores on a large scale throughout the territory of India and give systematic, regular publicity regarding the low prices of unbranded the Jan Aushodhi Stores and ensure regul...
Tag this Judgment!