Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jagmal(Decd.)thr.Lrs Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 05.2013 LA.APP. 128/2004 HARI CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. versus UOI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 129/2004 SIRYA ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. UOI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 192/2004 JAGMAL(DECD.)THR.LR'S Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Adv. UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 193/2004 CHANDER MAL & ORS. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Adv. versus UOI & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak...
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs. Rakesh Ranjan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on April 30, 2013 Judgment Delivered on May 29, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2872/2012 EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Aparna Bhat, Advocate versus RAKESH RANJAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.M.K Bhardwaj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. Order dated January 25, 2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing OA No.2769/2010 is in challenge. Petitioner has been directed to appoint candidates with respect to the examination held for promotion to the post of Enforcement Officer/Assistant Accounts Officer (re-designated as Accounts Officer) by treating the examination as on All-India basis.2. Recruitment to the post of Enforcement Officer/Assistant Accounts Officer (re-designated as Accounts Officer) under the Employees Provident W.P.(C) No.2872/2012 Fund Organization is governed the Enforcement Offic...
Mahender Singh Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 05.2013 LA.APP. 128/2004 HARI CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. versus UOI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 129/2004 SIRYA ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. UOI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 192/2004 JAGMAL(DECD.)THR.LR'S Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Adv. UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 193/2004 CHANDER MAL & ORS. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Adv. versus UOI & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak...
Madan Mohan Gupta Vs. the State(Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2013 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2013 + Crl. Rev.P.104 /2013 MADAN MOHAN GUPTA Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi with Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, Advocates versus THE STATE(GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. This Revision Petition is directed against a judgment dated 01.02.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(ASJ) affirming the conviction and sentence imposed on the Revisionist for commission of an offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and directing him to undergo RI for 18 months and to pay a compensation of `20,000/- to the complainant by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate(MM) by an order dated 09.02.2012.2. As per prosecution version, the Revisionist is a qualified homeopathic doctor and runs a homeopathic clinic at Gopi Nath Bazar, Delhi Cantt. in the name of Dr. M.M. Gupta Homeopathic Clinic. On...
Rajesh Kumar Tyagi @ Chotu Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2013 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2013 + CRL.A. 961/2009 RAJESH KUMAR TYAGI @ CHOTU ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sumeet Verma, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellant impugns a judgment dated 03.07.2009 and order on sentence dated 08.07.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) whereby he was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 373/376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for two years and to pay a fine of `2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for one month for the offence punishable under Section 373 IPC and to undergo RI for seven years and to pay a fine of `5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for six months for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC.2. As per the case of the prosec...
Kiran Vs. State Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2013 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 481/2013 HIRA PRASAD MISHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nishit Kush, Advocate with Mr. Shyam S. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev K. Baliyan, Advocate & Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocate Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate for the Complainant. CRL.M.C. 628/2013 KIRAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr. Shyam Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Badar Mehmood, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate, Mr. Shishir Mathur, Advocate & Mr. Taurif Akhter, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocate Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate for the Complaina...
Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Ramesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:9th May, 2013 Date of Decision:29. h May, 2013 % + CRL.A. 419/1997 NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwal, Advocate. versus RAMESH KUMAR Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB, for short) against the judgment dated 16.8.1997 in sessions case No.22/1995, acquitting the respondent, Ramesh Kumar from the charges made against him under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter shortly referred as NDPS Act).2. The case of the prosecution is that the NCB received secret information on the basis of which surveillance was mounted on room No.116, Hotel Janpath, New Delhi. A search party knocked at the door of the room and the door was opened by accused Ramesh Kumar. Two public witnesses were called as panch witnesses to witness the search. After giving...
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »