Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
Chander Mal and ors. Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 05.2013 LA.APP. 128/2004 HARI CHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. versus UOI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 129/2004 SIRYA ..... Appellant Through: versus Mr. Satpal Singh, Adv. UOI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 192/2004 JAGMAL(DECD.)THR.LR'S Through: versus ..... Appellant Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Adv. UOI & ANR Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak, advs. for R1/UOI /LAC Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA LA.APP. 193/2004 CHANDER MAL & ORS. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Satish Kumar Verma, Adv. versus UOI & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Ms. K. Kaomudi Kiran Pathak...
Shahid Balwa Vs. the Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :06. 05.2013 Decided on :29. 05.2013 + LPA No.79/2013 & CM No.2310/2013 SHAHID BALWA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advs. VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Garg along with Ms. Divya Jyoti Singh, Advs. and Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal, EO/ED. + AND LPA No.80/2013 & CM No.2332/2013 VINOD GOENKA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Vijay Aggarwal and Mr. Mudit Jain, Advs. VERSUS THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Garg along with Ms. Divya Jyoti Singh, Advs. and Mr. Sandeep Aggarwal, EO/ED. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. By the present appeal, the appellants seek to impugn the order dated 24.01.2013 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petitions of the appellants. The present order will dispose of LPA 79/2...
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
Krishan Kumar Gupta Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :22. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :29. 05.2013 + W.P.(C) 2530/2012 KRISHAN KUMAR GUPTA .......Petitioner Through: Richa Kapoor, Advocate Vs. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ......Respondent Through: Mr Kamal Nijhawan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.The petitioner got himself registered for allotment of an LIG Flat from DDA, under its New Pattern Registration Scheme-1979 (NPRS1979). On DDA launching another Scheme called Awas Sakar Yozna1989, the petitioner applied for transfer of his registration from NPRS1979 to Awas Sakar Yozna-1989. Since all the persons who had got their registration transferred from NPRS-1979 to Awas Sakar Yozna1989 could not be allotted flat, the respondent-DDA decided to consider, for allotment of flats in the next draw, such registrants who had not been allotted flats under Awas Sakar Yozna-1989, but whose priority numbers under NPRS-1979, had matured, after taking an affidavit fro...
Chandra Prakash Tiwari Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 608/2003 Reserved on:1. t April, 2013 Decided on:29. h May, 2013 % CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Kedar Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Mukesh Gupta, APP for the State with ASI Baldev Raj PS Khazoori Khas. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present appeal, the Appellant impugns the judgment dated 31st July, 2003 whereby he has been convicted for offence under Section 376 IPC and the order on sentence dated 5th August, 2003 directing the Appellant to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years with fine of Rs. 2,500/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 2 months.2. Learned counsel for the Appellant contends that the statement of the prosecutrix is not reliable. At the time of the alleged incident she was 30 years old and mother of three children. The medical evidence on record does not support the case of the...
Shalimar Paints Vs. Balaji Paints and Hardware
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :29. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.A.665/2013 SHALIMAR PAINTS Through : ..... Appellant Mr. S.K. Menta, Proxy Counsel for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Advocate. versus BALAJI PAINTS & HARDWARE Through : ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.Garg, J.(Open Court) 1. Present appeal has been preferred by the appellant against order dated 12.05.2011 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate in complaint case No.1935/2011 whereby the proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act instituted against the respondent were dismissed for non-prosecution.2. Notice of the leave petition was served to the respondent by way of publication. However, none appeared on behalf of the respondent. Vide order dated 17.05.2013, the appellant was granted leave to appeal. I have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and have examined the record. It reveals that in the proceedings under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act process was issued to the...
Hira Prasad Mishra Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2013 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 481/2013 HIRA PRASAD MISHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nishit Kush, Advocate with Mr. Shyam S. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev K. Baliyan, Advocate & Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocate Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate for the Complainant. CRL.M.C. 628/2013 KIRAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr. Shyam Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Badar Mehmood, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate, Mr. Shishir Mathur, Advocate & Mr. Taurif Akhter, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocate Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate for the Complaina...
Albert Ezung Vs. State Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL. A. No. 1462/2010 ALBERT EZUNG Through: ..... Appellant Mr. P.K. Singh, Advocate. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP. % Date of Decision : May 29, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVAKHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : REVAKHETRAPAL, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is to the judgment dated 23 rd October, 2010 and the order on sentence dated 29 th October, 2010 convicting the Appellant Albert Ezung for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentencing him to life imprisonment and fine of ` 3,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo RI for 3 months.2. The brief facts of present case are as under: The complainant Temjen Lungkumer (PW7), who was residing at E-114/115, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi with his friends Sedeivilie (PW10) and Ricky, had organized a party at his house on 9.9.2007 as he along with Sedeivilie and Ricky was leaving for his native place at Dim...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »