Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Kumar Kohli Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1455/2012 & Crl.M.B. 2246/2012, Crl.M.A. 442/2013 Reserved on:21. t March, 2013 Decided on:28. h May, 2013 % ANIL MAHESHWARI Through .. Appellant Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv. versus ... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 60/2013 & Crl.M.B. 91/2013 CBI + RAJESH KUMAR KOHLI Through .. Appellant Mr. K.R. Pamei, Adv. with Appellant in custody versus + CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 99/2013 & Crl.M.B. 138/2013 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA Through CRL.A.Nos. 1455/2012 & conn. Matters .. Appellant Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Mr. Dinesh versus .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 100/2013 & Crl.M.B. 139/2013 CBI + ....
Anil Maheshwari Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1455/2012 & Crl.M.B. 2246/2012, Crl.M.A. 442/2013 Reserved on:21. t March, 2013 Decided on:28. h May, 2013 % ANIL MAHESHWARI Through .. Appellant Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv. versus ... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 60/2013 & Crl.M.B. 91/2013 CBI + RAJESH KUMAR KOHLI Through .. Appellant Mr. K.R. Pamei, Adv. with Appellant in custody versus + CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 99/2013 & Crl.M.B. 138/2013 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA Through CRL.A.Nos. 1455/2012 & conn. Matters .. Appellant Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Mr. Dinesh versus .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 100/2013 & Crl.M.B. 139/2013 CBI + ....
Priti Pratap Singh Vs. the Sariska Palace and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* + HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI F.A.O. No.375 of 2007 & C.M. Nos.14346/2006, 11550, 16729/2007, 4598/2008, 4915/2009, 9924-9925/2011, 19493, 20294, 21007, 21013/2012, 205-206/2013 Decided on :28. h May, 2013 PRITI PRATAP SINGH Through: Appellant Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi & Mr. T.R. Thakur, Advocates. Versus THE SARISKA PALACE & ORS. Respondents Through: Mr. Brijesh Kalappa & Ms. Divya Nair, Advocates in C.M. No.206/2013. Mr. Rajendra Rawat, Advocate for M/s. Shiva Corporation India Ltd. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the order dated 6.9.2006 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi rejecting the suit for permanent and mandatory injunction filed by the appellant.2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff originally filed a suit bearing No.238/2006 for permanent and mandatory injunction against the respondent/defendant, The Sariska Palace, having its office in Bhikaji Cama Pl...
Banwari Lal Sharma Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve :14. 02.2013 Date of Decision :28. 05.2013 + LPA 858/2004 BANWARI LAL SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Advocate. Versus UOI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal with Mr. Ajay Monga and Mr. Ateev Mathur, Advocates for Resp-5. Ms. Latika Choudhary, proxy for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for GNCTD. Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 04.08.2004 of the learned Single Judge, whereby CM Nos. 370/04 and 3467/04 in WP(C) No. 959/99 and WP(C) No. 892/04 and 906-69/04, filed by the Village Sahoorpur Extn. Residents Welfare Association (the fifth Respondent here), were disposed of. It is contended that the effect of the impugned judgment is to suspend and reverse the judgment and...
Adarsh Kumar Aggarwal Vs. Kapri International Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No. 59 of 1994 IN THE MATTER OF: KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Vikram V. Minesh and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advocates for Ex-management. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Adarsh Kumar Aggarwal. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for Liquidator. AND CS (OS) No. 2293 of 1996 ADARSH KUMAR AGGARWAL .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Versus KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Vikram V. Minesh and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advocates for Ex-management. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for Liquidator. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 28 05.2013 CA No. 2068 of 2012 in Co. Pet. No. 59 of 1994 CA No. 27 of 1997 & IA No. 12367 of 2012 in CS (OS) No. 2293 o1. The background to these applications is that the Board for Financial and Industrial Reconstruction (BIFR) made a reference to this Court under Section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Spe...
Raja Ram Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d May, 2013 Date of Decision:28. h May, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1433/2012 RAJA RAM Through: ..... Appellant Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. Versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. Appellant namely, Raja Ram was tried for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to IPC) for causing death of Draupadi aged about 50 years at about 5.00 p.m. on 20th June, 2010 at Jhuggi No.168, Masjid Wali Gali, Hastal, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi. Vide impugned judgment dated 28th July, 2012, the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 IPC and vide order on sentence dated 30th July, 2012, he has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.1,000/- in default of which to undergo SI for 15 days.2. On 20th June, 2010, at 5.15 p.m., the Duty Officer, P.S. ...
Anand Pratyabhoot Vitt Nigam Ltd. Vs. Madhu Bala Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.APPL.(C) No. 1 of 2010 in Co. Pet. No. 95 of 1990 Reserved on: May 21, 2013 Decision on: May 28, 2013 ANAND PRATYABHOOT VITT NIGAM LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate for the Official Liquidator versus MADHU BALA SHARMA Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 28 05.2013 1. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator (OL) attached to this Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking to recover from the Respondent, Mrs. Madhu Bala Sharma, a sum of Rs. 6,13,408 together with interest @18% p.a. from June 2006 till realisation along with administrative expenses of the OL and costs.2. The background to this application is that Anand Pratyabhoot Vitt Nigam Ltd. (hereafter the company) was ordered to be wound up by this Court on 9th October 1997. The OL was appointed as its Liquidator. On 16th February 2005, the Court directed the OL to invite...
Arvind Kumar Sharma Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1455/2012 & Crl.M.B. 2246/2012, Crl.M.A. 442/2013 Reserved on:21. t March, 2013 Decided on:28. h May, 2013 % ANIL MAHESHWARI Through .. Appellant Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv. versus ... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 60/2013 & Crl.M.B. 91/2013 CBI + RAJESH KUMAR KOHLI Through .. Appellant Mr. K.R. Pamei, Adv. with Appellant in custody versus + CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 99/2013 & Crl.M.B. 138/2013 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA Through CRL.A.Nos. 1455/2012 & conn. Matters .. Appellant Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Mr. Dinesh versus .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 100/2013 & Crl.M.B. 139/2013 CBI + ....
Vinod Kumar Bhutani Vs. State Thr. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1455/2012 & Crl.M.B. 2246/2012, Crl.M.A. 442/2013 Reserved on:21. t March, 2013 Decided on:28. h May, 2013 % ANIL MAHESHWARI Through .. Appellant Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv. versus ... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 60/2013 & Crl.M.B. 91/2013 CBI + RAJESH KUMAR KOHLI Through .. Appellant Mr. K.R. Pamei, Adv. with Appellant in custody versus + CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 99/2013 & Crl.M.B. 138/2013 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA Through CRL.A.Nos. 1455/2012 & conn. Matters .. Appellant Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Mr. Dinesh versus .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 100/2013 & Crl.M.B. 139/2013 CBI + ....
Rajbir Singh Vs. D.T.C.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 01.05.2013 28.05.2013 W.P.(C) 2739/2004 RAJBIR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Vaishalee Mehra, Advocate. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. versus D.T.C. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner workman has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to assail the order dated 17.10.2001, as well as the award dated 05.09.2003 passed by the Labour Court-VII in I.D. No.956/96. By the first order dated 17.10.2001, the Labour Court decided the preliminary issue with regard to the legality and validity of the domestic inquiry conducted by the respondent, in favour of the respondent, and by the subsequent award dated 05.09.2003 the reference made by the Appropriate Government on 15.11.1996 with regard to the removal of the petitioner from service was answered in favour of the respondent by holding th...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »