Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kunwar Vijay Juneja Vs. Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1455/2012 & Crl.M.B. 2246/2012, Crl.M.A. 442/2013 Reserved on:21. t March, 2013 Decided on:28. h May, 2013 % ANIL MAHESHWARI Through .. Appellant Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv. versus ... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 60/2013 & Crl.M.B. 91/2013 CBI + RAJESH KUMAR KOHLI Through .. Appellant Mr. K.R. Pamei, Adv. with Appellant in custody versus + CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 99/2013 & Crl.M.B. 138/2013 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA Through CRL.A.Nos. 1455/2012 & conn. Matters .. Appellant Mr. B.S. Randhawa, Mr. Dinesh versus .. Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, Spl. PP with Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Ms. Nitya Bansal, Mr. Saket Mishra, Advs. with SI Chandra Bhan. CRL.A. 100/2013 & Crl.M.B. 139/2013 CBI + ....
In the Matter Of: Kapri International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ------
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.PET. No. 59 of 1994 IN THE MATTER OF: KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. .... Petitioner Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Vikram V. Minesh and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advocates for Ex-management. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Adarsh Kumar Aggarwal. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for Liquidator. AND CS (OS) No. 2293 of 1996 ADARSH KUMAR AGGARWAL .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. Versus KAPRI INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Muneesh Malhotra with Mr. Vikram V. Minesh and Mr. Achin Mittal, Advocates for Ex-management. Ms. Meenakshi Singh, Advocate for Liquidator. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 28 05.2013 CA No. 2068 of 2012 in Co. Pet. No. 59 of 1994 CA No. 27 of 1997 & IA No. 12367 of 2012 in CS (OS) No. 2293 o1. The background to these applications is that the Board for Financial and Industrial Reconstruction (BIFR) made a reference to this Court under Section 20 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Spe...
M/S. Kusum Sahni Pvt. Ltd. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No. 176/1984 Date of Decision:28. 05.2013 M/S. KUSUM SAHNI PVT. LTD. Through: .....Plaintiff Mr. Sanjeev Anand with Ms. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Renu Kuhar, Ms. Prachi Gupta & Mr. Abhaas Kumar, Advs. Versus NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: ......Defendant Mr. Yogesh Malhotra with Mr. Vishal Kohli, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This is a suit for recovery. The plaintiff seeks recovery of Rs. 26,50,000/- from the defendant insurance company together with the interest @ 21 % p.a. from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization. The case of the plaintiff in brief is that it is engaged in business of manufacturing and exporting garments, made ups and printing textiles etc. It is carrying its business in ten sheds located in Okhla Industrial Complex. C.S. (O.S.) 176/1984 Since from its incorporation, it has Page 1 of 23 tremendously grown to different countries, resulting in increase of its turnover....
Shervani Hospitalities Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI I.T.A. 804 OF 201.Reserved on:22. d March, 2013 Date of Decision:28. h May, 2013 % SHERVANI HOSPITALITIES LTD. ....APPELLANT Through Mr. Ajay Vohra and Ms. Kavita Jha, Advocates. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RESPONDENT Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.This appeal by the assessee which relates to the assessment year 2001-02, in effect impugns order dated 26th March, 2010, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(tribunal for short) confirming imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short). By order dated 19th December, 2011, the following substantial question of law was framed:Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in upholding levy of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961? 2. While framing the question of law, it was observed that the court was not framing ...
Mahesh Chand Vs. Union of India Through Its Foreign Secretary Ministry ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-28-2013
Birendra Kumar Sinha, Member (A) The applicant, who was a Personal Assistant (PA for short), qualified for the Limited Departmental Examination for SO/Grade-I Stenographers, 2004 result of which was declared in the month of March - April, 2006. On 11.07.2006, the applicant, on account of some personal problems, communicated his decision to continue in the PA line. He further informed that he attempted the examination in the year, 2006 in order to get his desired preference. The same was forwarded to the Ministry of External Affairs which considered his request and deleted his name from the Select List of SO through departmental examination in the year, 2004 vide communication dated 02.08.2006 (Annexure A2), Subsequently, the applicant filed another representation dated 18.12.2006 retracting from his earlier application dated 11.07.2006 writing the reasons of mental disturbances on account of family problems and made a fresh request to join in the Integrated II and III of IFS (B). There...
Ashwani @ Sonu Vs. the State( Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 969/2010 ASHWANI @ SONU Through: ..... Appellant Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Varun Deswal, Mr. Sudeve Panikar and Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advocates Mr. Anwesh Madhukar, Advocate (DHCLSC) versus THE STATE( NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP % Date of Decision: May 27, 2013 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The prosecution case emanates from the fact that on 5 th February, 2004, information was given to PCR regarding murder on which DD No. 38 was recorded at PP Vijay Vihar. The investigation was initially carried out by Inspector Jaipal Singh(PW-13) who along with Constable Vikram Singh (PW-10) reached the spot, i.e., house No. C-6/77, Sector-5, Rohini, Delhi. Crl. A. No. 969/2010 Kishan Kumar also reached the spot where complainant Satish Kapoor, father of the deceased along with his son Sanjay Kapoor met them. The outer door which was...
Chander Mohan Dutta Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. Rev. P. 119/2010 + Date of Decision:27. h May, 2013 # ! CHANDER MOHAN DUTTA .... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.C. Bhuttan, Advocate versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: The petitioner-accused is facing trial in Sessions Case No.141/1/10 arising out of FIR No. 852/2000 registered on 30th August, 2000 at Rajouri Garden Police Station, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 120-B IPC, 193/195/196 r/w Section 120-B IPC, 389 r/w 120-B IPC and 218 r/w Section 120-B IPC alongwith two others. Charges for these offences were framed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 18th August, 2007. Thereafter the prosecution evidence started and when seven prosecution witnesses had been examined the petitioneraccused raised an objection before the trial Court that PWs 1, 2, 6 and 7 were accomplice witnesses and so their evidence should not have been rec...
Simplex Projects Limited Vs. Jai Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + F.A.O. No.424 of 2012 & C.M. No.17455 of 2012 (for stay) Decided on :27. h May, 2013 SIMPLEX PROJECTS LIMITED Appellant Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Advocate. Versus JAI BANSAL Through: Respondent Mr. Ajay Kumar Porwal, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant under Order 43 Rule 1 (d) CPC against the order dated 21.9.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge in C.S. No.420/2010 dismissing the application of the defendant/appellant herein under Order IX Rule 13 CPC on the ground that the appellant was not able to show sufficient cause for setting the ex parte judgment and decree dated 8.2.2012.2. I have heard the learned counsel for the defendant/appellant who has vehemently contended that the learned trial court has fallen into an error by not allowing the application of the appellant for setting aside the ex parte decree as he was able to show sufficie...
Haji Mohd. Altaf Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. Rev. Petition. No. 709/2007 + Date of Decision:27. h May, 2013 # ! HAJI MOHD. ALTAF .... Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Sharma, Mr. Lav Kumar Agrawal & Mohd. Iqbal, Advocates versus $ STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP * CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: The petitioner-accused, who is an advocate by profession, alongwith three others is facing trial in Sessions Case No.141/1/10, arising out of FIR No. 852/2000 registered on 29 th August, 2000 at Rajouri Garden Police Station, for the commission of offences punishable under Section 120-B IPC, Sections 193/195/196 r/w Section 120-B IPC, Section 389 r/w 120-B IPC and Section 218 r/w Section 120-B IPC. Charges for these offences were ordered to be framed against the four accused persons by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide order dated 18th August, 2007. Only the petitioner-accused felt aggrieved by the trial Courts order framing these charges...
Shyam Lal Gupta Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-27-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2013 Date of Decision:27. h May, 2013 % + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.317/2013 SHYAM LAL GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.V.K. Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: + Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.318/2013 SHYAM LAL GUPTA Through: ..... Appellant Mr.V.K. Sharma, Advocate. Versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VED PRAKASH VAISH VED PRAKASH VAISH, J:1. The appellant Shyam Lal Gupta, father of the deceased Geeta Gupta has preferred two appeals against the common judgment dated 20th November, 2012 whereby all the accused persons have been acquitted for the offence under Sections 498A/304B/34 IPC. However, Rajesh Gupta was convicted under Section 279/304A IPC and vide order of sentence dated 23rd November, 2012 in Sessions case No.23/01/09 arising out of FIR No.716/99, P.S. Paschim Vihar, he has been sentenced ...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »