Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arif Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) Nos.3409/2013 Date of decision:30. h May, 2013 % ARIF ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Seema Sharma,Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Bajaj, Adv. for R1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % ORDER 30 05.2013 GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. With the consent of both the sides, this writ petition is taken up for hearing. A short issue which arises in this case is as to whether the petitioner, whose signatures are entirely in capital letters in English can be denied appointment to the post of Constable(GD) in the Central Armed forces i.e BSF, CISF, CRPF, SSB etc.2. This issue has been dealt with earlier vide a pronouncement dated 24 th February, 2012 in W.P.(C) 1004/2012 titled as Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Another v. Neeraj Kumar and Another.3. A similar issue thereafter was decided in favour of the writ petitioner in W.P.(C). 6959/2012 vide an order da...
Bhagat Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
$~9 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3583/2013 Date of decision:30. h May, 2013 % BHAGAT SINGH Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Shanker Chhabra, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ..... Respondent Mr. Ankur Chhiber and Ms.Aakriti Jain, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ORDER % 30.05.2013 GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) CM No. 6713/2013 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 3583/2013 1. With the consent of both the sides, this writ petition is taken up for hearing.2. The instant case relates to selection as a Constable(GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces pursuant to an advertisement issued in 2012. There appears to be an error in the typing of the year in the date of the impugned Memorandum. The year thereof has been wrongly mentioned as 2012 instead of 2013. The error is apparent inasmuch as the said communication has been issued with regard to a Selectio...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi Vs. Janved Meena
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved On: May 21, 2013 Judgment Delivered On: May 30, 2013 + W.P.(C) 2559/2012 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini and Mr.D.Rajeshwar Rai, Advocates versus JANVED MEENA Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Respondent Janved Meena was appointed on probation as a Staff Nurse on March 25, 2009, by the Health Department of the Government of NCT of Delhi and was posted at Jag Pravesh Chandra Hospital. A complaint was made by one Rohtash Yadav that respondent was demanding `50,000/- for granting medical clearance to him inasmuch as he had been empanelled for appointment as Constable in Delhi Police and therefore he had to be medically examined for medical fitness to be declared prior to letter offering appointment being issued to him.2. The Anti Co...
Harnam Singh Vs. M.P.Singh Saini and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.A.961/2008 HARNAM SINGH Through : ....Appellant Appellant in person. versus M.P.SINGH SAINI & ANR. .Respondents Through : Respondent No.1 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Harnam Singh (hereinafter referred as appellant) has preferred the present appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging correctness of the order dated 14.08.2008 of learned Additional District Judge in Civil Suit not CS/154/2004 Mohinder Pal Singh and anr. Vs. Harnam Singh, by which application moved by him under Section 340 Cr.P.C. was dismissed.2. The respondents- Mohinder Pal Singh Sahni and Narinder Pal Kaur Sahni had filed civil suit No.49/1997 for Mandatory Injunction and Damages through attorney Mohinder Pal Singh Anand against the appellant in this Court. The appellant filed written statement. Replication bearing their signatures was filed by ...
Bhanwar Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2013 Decided on:30. h May , 2013 % + CRL.A. 105/2003 BHANWAR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Vishal Chadha, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Vikas Puri. AND + CRL.A. 548/2003 SAKALDEEP Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Stalin Mani, Advocate. Appellant in custody. versus STATE (GNCT) OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Vikas Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellants challenge the impugned judgment dated 15 th November, 2002 convicting the Appellants for offence punishable under Section 489C IPC and the order on sentence dated 21st November, 2002 whereby they have been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a perio...
Rakesh Sharma Vs. State Thr.C.B.i.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t April, 2013 DECIDED ON : May 30, 2013 + CRL.A. 36/2006 RAKESH SHARMA Through : ..... Appellant Mr.A.P.Mohanty, Advocate with Mr.P.K.Pattanaik, Advocate. versus STATE THR.C.B.I. Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Manoj Ohri, Spl.PP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeal is disposed of in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.25/2006 titled Bimal Kishore Pandey Vs.State through C.B.I. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE May 30, 2013 sa...
M.P.Singh Sahni Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C.3772/2003 & CRL.M.A.5091/2003 M.P.SINGH SAHNI Through : ....Petitioner Mr.M.P.Singh Sahni in person. versus STATE & ORS. Through : .Respondents Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. M.P.Singh Sahni (hereinafter referred as the petitioner or accused) has preferred various petitions CRL.M.C.Nos. 3772/2003, 244445/2005, 54/2008, 2790/2000, 3773/2003, 3779/2003, 3781/2003, 3782/2003, 3784/2003, 3193/2005 and 3783/2003 for quashing of the various criminal proceedings initiated against him by Harnam Singh (hereinafter referred as complainant or respondent No.2).2. Case of the complainant is that he is a highly qualified ex- banker having an experience of seventeen years. He was earlier posted at Senior Executive level in a Nationalized Bank. The petitioner and his wife Narider Pal Kaur Sahni engaged him to provide professional services in re...
Sakaldeep Vs. State (Gnct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20. h May, 2013 Decided on:30. h May , 2013 % + CRL.A. 105/2003 BHANWAR SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Vishal Chadha, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Vikas Puri. AND + CRL.A. 548/2003 SAKALDEEP Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Stalin Mani, Advocate. Appellant in custody. versus STATE (GNCT) OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for the State with SI Pawan Kumar, PS Vikas Puri. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellants challenge the impugned judgment dated 15 th November, 2002 convicting the Appellants for offence punishable under Section 489C IPC and the order on sentence dated 21st November, 2002 whereby they have been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years with fine of Rs. 10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a perio...
Directorate of Adult Education Vs. Birender Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: % + 19.03.2013 Judgment delivered on:30. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 6360/2008 DIRECTORATE OF ADULT EDUCATION Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Reeta Kaul, Advocate versus BIRENDER KUMAR & ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Varun Prasad, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.C.M. Application No. 2853/2013 This application has been preferred by Respondent no. 3, Sh. Kuldeep Singh, for grant of wages under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (Act for short), since the impugned award dated 24.03.2008 directs reinstatement of the respondent into service, which has been stayed by this Court vide order dated 01.09.2008. It is pertinent to note, than an earlier application bearing C.M. no. 6427/2009 under Section 17B of the Act was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 26.08.2011 after the petitioner in its reply to the 17B application submitted that the respondents were gainfully employed. In ...
M.P.Singh Sahni Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3779/2003 & CRL.M.A.5100/2003 M.P.SINGH SAHNI .... Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Harnam Singh in person. AND + CRL.M.C.54/2008 & CRL.M.A.199/2008 MOHINDER PAL SINGH SAHNI Through : Petitioner in person. ....Petitioner versus HARNAM SINGH Through : .Respondent Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. M.P.Singh Sahni (hereinafter referred as the petitioner or accused) has preferred various petitions CRL.M.C.Nos. 3772/2003, 244445/2005, 54/2008, 2790/2000, 3773/2003, 3779/2003, 3781/2003, 3782/2003, 3784/2003, 3193/2005 and 3783/2003 for quashing of the various criminal proceedings initiated against him by Harnam Singh (hereinafter referred as complainant or respondent).2. Case of the complainant is that he is a highly qualified ex- banker having an experience of seventeen year...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »