Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pradyumn Kumar Tomar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.2434/2013, 2439/2013, 2511/2013, 2513/2013 & 2514/2013 Date of decision:30. h May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 2434/2013 DEEPAK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2439/2013 PRADYUMN KUMAR TOMAR Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2511/2013 SHARWAN KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2513/2013 VAREITHING A. SHATSANG ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Soayib Qureshi, Adv. and + W.P.(C) 2514/2013 ASHWANI KUMAR Through...
Vareithing A. Shatsang Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.2434/2013, 2439/2013, 2511/2013, 2513/2013 & 2514/2013 Date of decision:30. h May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 2434/2013 DEEPAK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2439/2013 PRADYUMN KUMAR TOMAR Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2511/2013 SHARWAN KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2513/2013 VAREITHING A. SHATSANG ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Soayib Qureshi, Adv. and + W.P.(C) 2514/2013 ASHWANI KUMAR Through...
M.P.Singh Sahni Vs. State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C.3782/2003 & CRL.M.A.Nos.5106/2003, 8306/2008 & 5962/2008 M.P.SINGH SAHNI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.M.P.Singh Sahni in person. Versus STATE & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present petition is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.M.C.No.3781/2003 titled M.P.Singh Sahni vs. State & Ors.. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY 30.2013/tr file of...
Govt. of Nct of Delhi Represented By: Commissioner Vs. Ravinder Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 4387/2007 EX.CONST.AJAYVIR GULIA .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 1026/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAVINDER SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 7344/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.4387/07, 1026/13 & 7344/12 Represented by: Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HO...
Deepak Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.2434/2013, 2439/2013, 2511/2013, 2513/2013 & 2514/2013 Date of decision:30. h May, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 2434/2013 DEEPAK KUMAR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2439/2013 PRADYUMN KUMAR TOMAR Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. ..... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2511/2013 SHARWAN KUMAR YADAV ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Adv. Ms. Richa Kapoor, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 7. with + W.P.(C) 2513/2013 VAREITHING A. SHATSANG ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Soayib Qureshi, Adv. and + W.P.(C) 2514/2013 ASHWANI KUMAR Through...
Neeraj Singh Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Finance ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
Birendra Kumar Sinha, Member (A) The instant Original Application filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 is directed against the Memorandum No. C-14011/44/2012 VandL dated 19.09.2012 whereby a major penalty charge-sheet has been served upon him on the allegations in respect of which he has already been investigated by the CBI and exonerated by the court of competent jurisdiction. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the applicant is an officer of Indian Revenue Service (1994 batch). An FIR No.RC.AC.3/2004A0001 dated 16.04.2004 was filed against him by the CBI U/S 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 read with Section 120-B IPC alleging that the applicant, while posted as ACIT (Inv.), Circle 6(1), Mumbai, had official dealings with one Viren Ahuja and his company named M/s. Gilbraltor Finance Investment and Leasing Company Pvt. Ltd., with which he was associated inasmuch as he along with Smt. Nidhi Srivastava, DGIT, Circ...
Urmila Mishra Vs. State Nct of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:22. d May, 2013 Pronounced on:29. h May, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 481/2013 HIRA PRASAD MISHRA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Nishit Kush, Advocate with Mr. Shyam S. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sanjeev K. Baliyan, Advocate & Mr. Rajesh Kaushik, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocate Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate for the Complainant. CRL.M.C. 628/2013 KIRAN Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Mohit Mathur, Advocate with Mr. Shyam Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Badar Mehmood, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate, Mr. Shishir Mathur, Advocate & Mr. Taurif Akhter, Advocate versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sahil Mongia, Advocate, Ms. Priyanka Kapoor, Advocate & Mr. Mohd. Adnan, Advocate Mr. Amit Khanna, Advocate for the Complaina...
Securities and Exchange Board of India (Trust Pet. N Vs. Crb Capital M ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. APPL. NOS. 1143/2003, 1144/2009, 1145/2009, 1153/2009, 1767/2009, 200/2010, 201/2010, 712/2010, 1941/2010 & 782/2012, 783/2012 & 913/2012 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 379/2009 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA (TRUST PET. NO.3/1997) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra & Mr. Shailendra Singh, Advocates Versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for R-1, 2 & 3. Mr. Arunabh Chaudhary, Mr. Atanu Chakraborty, & Mr. Gainilung Panmei, Mr. Dorjee Karma, Advocates for Indian Infotech & Software Ltd. Mr. A.N. Haksar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shiv Sapra & Ms. Deeksha Khurana, Advocate for Sofear Global in CA Nos.1145/2009 and 1941/2010 Mr. Arvind Kr. Gupta, Advocate for applicants in CA Nos.1153/2009 & 1767/2009 Mr. Sumesh Dhawan & Mrs. Vatsala Kak Panda, Advocates for applicant in CA 913/2012 Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1144/2009. CORAM: HON'...
Sh.Devender Singh Sandhu Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.2405/2013 % Date of decision:29. h May, 2013 SH.DEVENDER SINGH SANDHU Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Ankur Chhiber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sumeet Pushkarna, Adv. with DC Bhupinder Sharma, BSF Commandant P.C. Sharma CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA GITA MITTAL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petitioner was appointed in the Border Security Force (BSF) on 28th December, 1992 upon his release from Short Service Commission with the Indian Army and was posted as Assistant Commandant with the 27 th Battalion, BSF at Charare Sharif, Jammu & Kashmir where he remained till November, 1996. The petitioner was posted in January, 1997 to 14 Bn. at Aknoor and was attached to Frontier Headquarters, BSF as AC (Op).2. On 24th May, 2000 based on his work performance and achievements, the petitioner was duly promoted to the rank of Deputy Commandant in the BSF but was retained in...
J.P.Bhardwaj Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-29-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.348/2012 Date of decision:29. h May, 2013 % J.P.BHARDWAJ Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. S.S. Pandey, Adv. versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA ORDER % 29.05.2013 GITA MITTAL, J (Oral) 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 30th June, 2010 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal rejecting the petitioners challenge to the action of the respondents in treating the injuries suffered by the petitioner as physical casualty instead of battle casualty in an operational area which had caused 100% disability to the petitioner.2. The facts giving rise to the present petition are briefly noted hereafter. The petitioner was enrolled on 24th December, 1980 in the Indian Army in the Corps of EME as Vehicle Mechanic. It is not disputed that the petitioner served various units of the Army with dedication and devotion to duty between 1981 to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »