Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Amarjeet Singh Bajwa Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministr ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
Shekhar Agarwal, Member (A) The applicant has sought the following relief:- (a) quash the impugned chargesheet with all consequential benefits. (b) direct the respondents to release the withheld retiral benefits forthwith penal interest. (c) award costs of the proceedings and (d) pass any other order/direction which this Honble Tribunal deem fit and proper in favour of the applicant and against the respondents in the facts and circumstances of the case. 2. The applicant joined Delhi Police as Sub-Inspector in 1972. In 1989 he was promoted as Inspector and as Assistant Commissioner of Police (DANIPS) in the year 2007. He retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2009. However, just before his retirement he was served with a chargesheet on 30.03.2009 which according to the applicant was received by him on 02.04.2009. The chargesheet proposed enquiry against the applicant under Rule-14 of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 on the following charges:- Article-1 Shri Amarjeet Singh Bajwa, AC...
Col. Kamal Deep Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: May-01-2013
By Chairperson: 1. Petitioner by this petition has prayed to set aside and quash the GCM proceedings having been vitiated because of material irregularities. He has also prayed to set aside and quash the impugned order dated 01.11.2010 rejecting his post confirmation petition and order dated 21.10.2008. He has also prayed to set aside the show cause notice dated 04.02.2009 and order of the Central Government dated 12.01.2012 received on 15.02.2012 terminating the services of applicant by way of dismissal from service without pension and gratuity under provisions of Army Act read Section 19 read with Army rule 14 (4) (a) with all consequential benefits. 2. The petitioner was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1st HORSE on 29.08.1981 and with a passage of time, he rose to the position of the rank of Lt. Colonel and subsequently Colonel. He was placed in Command of his parent unit in October, 2004. It is alleged that in November, 2005 he did not grant an extension to the then Risaldar Maj...
- ‹ Prev
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- Next ›