Delhi Court May 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indian Institute of Planning and Management and an Vs. All India Counc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :20. 05.2013 Decided on :30. 05.2013 + W.P.(C) 4630/2007 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT AND ANR .... Petitioners Through Mr.Maninder Singh, Sr.Adv. and Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr.Gursharan Singh and Mr,Praveen Nagar, Advs. versus ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ANR. .... Respondents Through Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for AICTE/ R-1 Mr.Arjun Mitra, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.1. The present writ petition is filed by the Petitioner Indian Institute of Planning & Management seeking a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction for setting aside the show cause notices dated 08.12.2005, 09.12.2005 and 09.03.2007 and the communication dated 20.06.2007. The writ petition also seeks a writ of mandamus or appropriate writ against the respondent to delete the name of the petitioner from the list of unapprove...
M.P.Singh Sahni Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3784/2003 & CRL.M.A.5110/2003 M.P.SINGH SAHNI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.M.P.Singh Sahni in person. versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of order dated 04.06.1999 by which he was summoned for committing offence punishable under Section 500 IPC.2. It reveals that complaint case was filed by respondent No.2 against the petitioner on 13.01.1998 for committing offence under Section 500 IPC. It was alleged that pursuant to agreement dated 22.07.1991 executed with the petitioner, he was to provide professional/ consultancy services to him. Number of correspondences exchanged between them. It is alleged that the petitioner sent several fax messages ...
Govt.of Nct of Delhi Vs. Mahesh Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 4387/2007 EX.CONST.AJAYVIR GULIA .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 1026/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAVINDER SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 7344/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.4387/07, 1026/13 & 7344/12 Represented by: Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HO...
The Timken Company Vs. Timken Services Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS)No.3/2010 and I.A.No.21/2010 Date of Decision: May 30, 2013 THE TIMKEN COMPANY Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Archana Sahadeva and Ms. Charu Mehta, Advs. versus TIMKEN SERVICES PRIVATE LTD. ..... Defendant Through Mr. Manu T. Ramachandran, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT IA No.21/2010 1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction for restraining the defendant from infringing the plaintiffs registered trade mark Timken, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts, delivery, etc. In IA No.21/2010, the plaintiff is seeking interim injunction against the defendant during the pendency of the suit.2. Plaintiffs case 2.1. The plaintiff, a company incorporated in the USA, is the registered proprietor of the trade mark Timken in classes 4, 6, 7, 9, 12, 16 and 37. The earliest registration(s) dates back to 1st June, 1942. The plaintiffs trade mark Timken is also registered...
Rattan Singh Girls College of Education Vs. National Council of Teache ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: May 30th, 2013 % + W.P.(C) 6853/2010 RATTAN SINGH GIRLS COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv. with.Abhinav Bajaj, Adv. versus NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present writ petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to set aside the impugned order dated 27.9.2010 passed by the Appellate Committee of National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE) in Appeal No.89-979/2010 whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner herein was rejected and the NRCs decision to withdraw recognition of the petitioner institute was confirmed. The petitioner also seeks directions to the NCTE to restore the recognition of the petitioner institute for M.Ed course and direct M.D.U. to restore affiliation of the petitioner f...
M.P.Singh Sahni Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C. 3193/2005 & CRL.M.A.7109/2005 M.P.SINGH SAHNI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.M.P.Singh Sahni in person. versus STATE & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. M.P.Singh Sahni (hereinafter referred as the petitioner or accused) has preferred various petitions CRL.M.C.Nos. 3772/2003, 244445/2005, 54/2008, 2790/2000, 3773/2003, 3779/2003, 3781/2003, 3782/2003, 3784/2003, 3193/2005 and 3783/2003 for quashing of the various criminal proceedings initiated against him by Harnam Singh (hereinafter referred as complainant or respondent No.2).2. Case of the complainant is that he is a highly qualified ex- banker having an experience of seventeen years. He was earlier posted at Senior Executive level in a Nationalized Bank. The petitioner and his wife Narider Pal Kaur Sahni engaged him to provide professional service...
M.G.Ramachandran and anr Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Delhi and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:30. 05.2013 W.P.(C) 1518/2013 M.G.RAMACHANDRAN AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv with Mr Kumar Mihir and Mr Pallav Mongia, Advs. versus THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr Pawan Mathur, Adv for DDA. Mr Ajay Arora and Mr Kapil Dutta, Adv for SDMC Ms Amrita Panda and Mr Nitish Gupta, Advs for respondent No. 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) Plot No. C-32, Friends Colony (East) initially measured 800 square yards. Subsequently, considering that since residential plots being developed by DDA were sold partly by draw of lots to persons belonging to low and middle income groups and the size of said plots did not exceed 200 square yards whereas plots of bigger sizes were being sold by auction, the Government of India, with a view to see that big size plots were not sold by auction, decided that no plot of land for residential purposes, ...
M.P.Singh Sahni Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C.3783/2003 & CRL.M.A.Nos.5108/2003, 8305/2008 & 5950/2008 M.P.SINGH SAHNI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.M.P.Singh Sahni in person. Versus STATE & ORS. Through : ..... Respondents Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present petition is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.M.C.No.3781/2003 titled M.P.Singh Sahni vs. State & Ors.. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY 30.2013/tr file of...
Mohinder Pal Singh Sahni Vs. Harnam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :1. t FEBRUARY, 2013 DECIDED ON :30. h MAY, 2013 + CRL.M.C.54/2008 & CRL.M.A.No.199/2008 MOHINDER PAL SINGH SAHNI ..... Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person. Versus HARNAM SINGH Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Harnam Singh in person. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present petition is allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the Crl.M.C.No.3779/2003 titled M.P.Singh Sahni vs. State & Ors.. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE MAY 30.2013/tr file of...
Ex.Const.Ajayvir Gulia Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-30-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 02, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 4387/2007 EX.CONST.AJAYVIR GULIA .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Shanker Raju, Advocate versus UOI & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Gautam Gupta, Advocate for Mr.Aditya Madan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 06, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 1026/2013 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI REPRESENTED BY: COMMISSIONER OF POLICE .....Petitioner Represented by: Mr.V.K.Tandon, Advocate with Mr.Yogesh Saini, Advocate versus RAVINDER SINGH Represented by: .....Respondent Mr.Sachin Chauhan, Advocate Judgment Reserved on: May 13, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 30, 2013 W.P.(C) 7344/2012 GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI W.P.(C) Nos.4387/07, 1026/13 & 7344/12 Represented by: Ms.Sonia Arora, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate versus MAHESH KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: .....Respondents Mr.Saurabh Ahuja, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HO...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »