Chennai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S. Mohan Vs. The Assistant Engineer, Town/South/TNEB, Sivagangai Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to restore the petitioner's Service connection in S.C.No.402007392 forthwith and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition and to that effect he has also sent a letter dated 15.04.2016 to the Registry to post this writ petition for withdrawal. 2. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Limited, Madurai Vs. A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 20.04.2000 made in MCOP.No.747 of 1996, MCOP.No.749 of 1996 and MCOP.No.748 of 1996 respectively on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Principal District Judge, Dindigul.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 20.04.2000 made in MCOP.No.747 of 1996, MCOP.No.749 of 1996 and MCOP.No.748 of 1996 respectively on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Principal District Judge, Dindigul. 2. The appellant, Insurance Company is the third respondent in all MCOPs. The respondents 1 to 4 in CMA(MD).No.1403 of 2010 are legal heirs of deceased Pechiammal / claimants. The first respondent in both CMA(MD).No.1404 of 2010 and CMA.(MD).No.1405 of 2010 are the claimants, injured persons. The fifth respondent in CMA(MD).Nos.1403 of 2010 and second respondent in CMA.(MD)No.1404 of 2010 and fourth respondent ...
The Engineer in Chief and Chief Engineer General, Public Works Departm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
M. Venugopal, J. 1. The learned Special Government Pleader for the appellants has made an endorsement to the following effect: I request the Hon'ble Court may kindly permit the Appellants to withdraw the appeal. 2. In view of the endorsement so made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the appellants, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
B. Jithin Jacob Vs. The Superintendent (CBI), Chennai and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 07.09.2015 made to the first respondent and consequently direct the first respondent to investigate actions of the second respondent and to initiate appropriate action against the third respondent with regard to the refusal of tatkal passport to the petitioner and others.) 1. The petitioner has come forward with this writ petition praying for issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to consider his representation dated 07.09.2015 made to the first respondent and consequently direct the first respondent to investigate the actions of the second respondent and to initiate appropriate action against the third respondent with regard to the refusal of tatkal passport to him and others. 2. It is contended by the petitioner in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition that he studied B.T...
P. Karnan Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, A ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to stop the works under the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Virudhunagar District which was allotted without following due process of law and consequently directing the 1 and 2 respondents to take appropriate action against the third respondent and pass orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. On 11.04.2016, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, hence the matter was ordered to be posted on 12.04.2016 under the caption 'for dismissal'. 2. Even today when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous petition is closed....
M. Muthumari Vs. The Chairperson/Commissioner of Land Reforms, Chennai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and pass orders to grant property situated at Plot No.,6, Block B3 at S.No.537/2 of Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin Revenue District under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958 by way of issuing patta to the petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 13.01.2016 sent by the petitioner and to pass any other order as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The prayer in the Writ Petition is for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders to grant property situated at Plot No.,6, Block B3 at S.No.537/2 of Pandavarmangalam Village, Kovilpatti Taluk, Tuticorin Revenue District under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Act, 1958 by way of issuing patta to the petitioner on the basis of the representation dated 13.01.2016 sent by the petitioner. 2...
M. Krishna Reddy Vs. Sampangi Reddy and Others
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying against the order dated 22.04.2013 made in I.A.No.821 of 2008 in O.S.No.285 of 2008, on the file of District Munsif Court, Hosur.) 1. Today, when the Civil Revision Petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made in the Civil Revision Petition, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Madurai Division Vs. T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer: The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Judgment and Decree dated 14.09.1998 made in MCOP.No.317 of 1997, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Virudhunagar.) 1. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree, dated 14.09.1998 made in MCOP.No.317 of 1997, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal / Sub Court, Virudhunagar. 2. The appellant, Transport Corporation is first respondent and the first respondent is the claimant in MCOP.No.317 of 1997. The second respondent is the owner of vehicle and the third respondent is the Insurance Company. 3. The first respondent filed claim petition claiming a sum of Rs.2,15,000/- as compensation for the injury suffered by her in the accident took place on 30.12.1991. 4. According to the first respondent, she was travelling in the bus belonging to the appellant, Transport Corporation. At that time, the bus belonging to the ...
T. Baskar Vs. The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable E ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to conduct Chithirai festival to Arulmigu Perumal Swamy Temple, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District to be held on 28.04.2016 to 30.04.2016 by collecting tax and donation from the worshippers and local people and not to allow the third respondent in the administration of the above temple and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) 1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition to direct the second respondent to strictly follow the decision taken in the Peace Committee Meeting held on 09.05.2015 and consequently, direct the second respondent to permit the festival committee to conduct Chithirai Varudhabhisega Thiruvizha scheduled from 28.04.2016 to 30.04.2016 in Arulmigu Perumal Swamy Thirukkovil, Sathankulam, Thoothukudi District. 2. According to the petitioner, he wants to implement the order passed in the Peace Com...
Gopal Pillai Vs. Muralidharan
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-18-2016
(Prayer in all C.R.P.Nos.1815 to 1818 of 2015: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair order and decretal order dated 04.02.2015 in I.A.Nos.7,8,18 and 32 of 2015 in O.S.No.88 of 2006 on the file of the Hon'ble District Munsif Court, Tambaram.) Common Order: 1. The sole defendant in O.S.No.88 of 2006 pending on the file of the Court of District Munisf, Tambaram is the petitioner in the Civil Revision Petition. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in the said suit. 2. Notice before admission was given and the respondent has entered appearance through counsel. The arguments advanced on both sides are heard. The certified copy of the impugned order and the copies of the other documents produced in the form of typed-set of papers are also perused. 3. The petitioner and the respondent are related to each other. The revision petitioner/defendant is none other than the son of the paternal grandfather's sister of the respondent/plaintiff....