Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ishaan Pejavar Rao, and Another vs Mrs.Shareen Premanayagam, and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
A.No.1520 of 2025 in C.S.No.195 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU, J.This application has been filed to withdraw the suit in O.S.No.103 of 2024, pending on the file of the Sub-Court, Alandur and transfer the same, to be heard tried and adjudicated along with the suit in C.S.No.195 of 2024, pending before this Hon'ble Court.2. Heard Mr.S.R.Raghunathan, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Mr.S.Sudharshan, learned counsel for R1.3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the 1st respondent submitted that he has no objection in allowing this application.4. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into account that the learned counsel for the respondent has no objection in allowing this application, the same is ordered as prayed for. 26.06.2025 (1/3) kak Page No. 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Ishaan Pejavar Rao, and Another vs Mrs.Shareen Premanayagam, and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in CS No. 195 of 2024 Ishaan Pejavar Rao, And Another S/o Late Dr.P.Suresh Rao, No.1204, Shoba Petunia, Veerannapalya, Nagawara Post, Banglore - 560 045. and another Applicant(s) Vs Mrs.Shareen Premanayagam, And Another No.5, Bharath Nagar Extension, 200, Feet Water Canal Road, Behind Ici School, Kolathur, Chennai - 600 099. and another Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.S.R. Raghunathan For Respondent(s): Mr.Sudharshan For Mr.Subramanian (For R1) No appearance (For R2)ORDERThis application has been filed, pending disposal of the application for transfer, Stay all further proceedings in O.S.NO.103 of 2024, pending on the file of the Sub Court, Alandur.2. In view of the orders passed by this Court in A.No.1520 of 2025 in C.S.No.195 of 2024, this application in A.No.1521 of 2025 in C.S.No.195 of 2024 stands closed. No costs. 26-06-2025 (2/3) kak To1. Mrs.Shareen Premanayagam, And Anot...
M/s.Anish Orchardes Private Limited, Vs The Official Liquidator,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
C.M.P.No. 14600 of 2025 and O.S.A.Sr.No. 39162 of 2022Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH., J.) For the reasons set out in the accompanying petition, theproduction of original copy of orderdated 18.1.2024 in Comp.A.No. 159 of 2020 in C.P.No. 57 of 1998 seeking dispense is ordered. [A.S.M, .J] [N.S, .J] 26.06.2025 ssm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Prabhu Ramakrishnan and Another vs Mr.Shyam Kumar Shrivastava (Decease ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
A.No.2592 of 2025 in C.S.No.321 of 2019K.KUMARESH BABU,J.This application has been filed to permit the applicants/plaintiffs herein to file Additional Documents referred to in the schedule to the application in the above suit C.S.No.321 of 2019 to be marked as Document by the plaintiffs.2. Mr.A.Palaniappan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 21 submitted that he has no objection in allowing this application.3. Heard both sides.4. Considering the averments made inthe affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in allowing this application, the same is ordered as prayed for. 26.06.2025 (1/2) kak https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 1 of 1...
Vaidhegi vs the Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Vaidhegi ... Petitioner Vs. Vellore District ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 06.03.2025 in C3/D.O.No.11/2025 against the petitioner's husband Mari, Male, aged 40 years, S/o.Minisamy, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the Court and set him at liberty.For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public ProsecutorORDERAND When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the Government O...
Narmatha vs the Secretary to the Government,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Narmatha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to the Government Vellore District ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 06.03.2025 in C3/D.O.No.10/2025 against the petitioner's husband Mickelraj, Male, aged 36 years, S/o.Katturaja, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public ProsecutorORDERANDWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents,...
Suvitha vs the Secretary to the Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Suvitha ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to the Government Vellore District ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the entire records in connection with the order of detention passed by the second respondent dated 06.03.2025 in C3/D.O.No.09/2025 against the petitioner's husband Asirvatham, Male, aged 38 years, S/o.Palani, who is confined at Central Prison, Vellore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before the Court and set him at liberty. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public ProsecutorORDERANDWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by...
ZB.5, Konerirajapuram Primary Vs The Income Tax Officer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.No.10530 of 2022 1.ZB.5, Konerirajapuram Primary Agricultural Rep. by its Secretary, R.Karthikeyan, S/o.K.Rajamanickam, New Street, Konerirajapuram Post, Kuthalam Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District - 612 201. 2.ZB.99, Kuttalam Primary Agricultural G.Thirunavukarasu, S/o.Govindarajan, Somasundaram Buildings, Kuttalam - 609 801, Mayiladuthurai District. 3.ZB.58, Kiliyanur Primary Agricultural Rep. by its Secretary, T.Devendran, S/o.A.Thangavel, Aadham Street, Kiliyanur & Post, Tharangambadi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. 4.ZB.130, Kshethirapalapuram Primary Agricultural A.Gnanavel, S/o.P.Arumugam, Main Road, Vanathirajapuram Post, Kuthalam Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. 5.ZB.80, Palayagudaloor Primary Agricultural K.Vijayalakshmi, D/o.Karunanithi, Thennanchalai Street, Palayagudaloor, Mayiladuthurai District. ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The Income Tax Officer, Kumbakonam. 2.Th...
Mahalakshmi vs State of Tamilnadu Rep.by Its, Additional Chief Secreta ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Mahalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government Villupuram District Central Prison, Cuddalore ... RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the entire records relating to petitioner's husband detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order dated 09.03.2025 on the file of the second respondent herein made in proceedings Rc.No.C2/13/2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the said petitioner's husband namely Gopikrishnan Venkatakrishnan Vasu, aged 36 years, son of Vasu, before this Court and set him at liberty, now petitioner's husband detained at Central Prison, Cuddalore.For Petitioner : Mr.C.C.Chellappan For Re...
Jayakumar vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN And W.M.P.Nos.12941 and 12943 of 2025 Jayakumar ... Petitioner Vs. Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records relating to the order of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.No.710/2023/E2 dated 14.03.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to For Petitioner : Mr.M.Muthappan For Respondents : Mr.R.U.Dinesh Kumar for R1 and R2 Additional Government Pleader Ms.E.Ranganayaki for R3ORDERThe petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to theorder of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.No.710/2023/E2 dated14.03.2025 and quash the same and direct the respondents to 2.According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner though they have got alternative remedy, since because...